Skip to main content

Made by Hand

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Animation ((PAANI))

Abstract

Tracing connections between craft and activism since the Industrial Revolution, this chapter critically reflects on discourses of craft and the handmade. Whereas the experimental animation community privileges analogue, handmade processes that appear to oppose and critique commercial animation production, it is argued here that this approach is underpinned by nostalgia and is often faked. What looks like a hand-painted animation could actually be a simulation that was “painted” in a software package. Aesthetics alone do not guarantee that a work of art opposes the mainstream. Instead of recycling the past to create “artistic” animation, contemporary practitioners can equally investigate issues of labour and materiality through digital tools and virtual materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Animate Projects. 2016. “Animate OPEN: Parts & Labour.” http://animateprojectsarchive.org/films/by_project/animate_open_parts_labour/animate_open_parts_labour.

  • Balsom, Erika. 2013. Exhibiting Cinema in Contemporary Art. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. 1969. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations, edited by Gerald Arendt, translated by Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Claire. 2012. “The Digital Divide.” Artforum. September, 434–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, Preston. 1994. Cartoon Animation. Laguna Hills, CA: Walter Foster Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadberry, Stephen, and Bishnupriya Gupta. 2009. “Lancashire, India, and Shifting Competitive Advantage in Cotton Textiles, 1700–1850: The Neglected Role of Factor Prices.” Economic History Review 62 (2): 279–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, David. 1988. “Cel Animation: Mass Production and Marginalization in the Animated Film Industry.” Film History 2 (3): 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etsy, Inc. 2018a. “Shop for Anything from Creative People Everywhere.” Etsy. https://www.etsy.com.

  • ———. 2018b. “Code as Craft.” Etsy. https://codeascraft.com/about/.

  • Foá, Maryclare, and Birgitta Hosea. 2019. “Chapter 3. Communicating.” In Performance Drawing: New Practices Since 1945, edited by Maryclare Foá, Jane Grisewood, Birgitta Hosea, and Carali McCall. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frayling, Christopher. 2017. On Craftsmanship: Towards a New Bauhaus. London: Oberon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, Betty. 2014. Craftivism: The Art of Craft and Activism. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Inga. 2014. “Daily Narratives and Enduring Images: The Love Encased by Craft.” In Craftivism: The Art of Craft and Activism, edited by Betty Greer. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric. 1999. Industry and Empire: From 1750 to the Present Day. Revised edition. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. “Introduction: Inventing Traditions.” In The Invention of Tradition, edited by Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, and Madrid: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosea, Birgitta. 2010. “Drawing Animation.” Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5 (3): 353–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husbands, Lilly. 2016. “Craft’s Critique: Artisanal Animation in the Digital Age.” Animate Projects. http://animateprojectsarchive.org/writing/essays/l_husbands_2.

  • Johnson, Garth. 2008. “Down the Tubes: In Search of Internet Craft.” In Handmade Nation: The Rise of DIY, Art, Craft, and Design, edited by Faith Levine and Cortney Heimerl. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Faith, and Cortney Heimerl. 2008. Handmade Nation: The Rise of DIY, Art, Craft, and Design. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loader, Alison Reiko. 2014. “Surviving the Animator’s Survival Kit: ‘I’m Not Bad, I’m Just Drawn That Way.’” Animationstudies 2.0 (blog). https://blog.animationstudies.org/?p=869.

  • Maker Media, Inc. 2018. “Make Magazine.” Make Magazine. https://makezine.com.

  • Manovich, Lev. 2002. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. “Inside Photoshop.” Computational Culture: A Journal of Software Studies 1. http://computationalculture.net/inside-photoshop/.

  • Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 1969. “Manifesto of the Communist Party.” In Marx/Engels Selected Works, translated by Samuel Moore. Vol 1. Moscow: Progress Publishers. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf.

  • Mathis, Charles-François. 2016. “Ruskin’s Heirs: Art, Nature and Socialism.” E-Rea 13 (2). http://journals.openedition.org/erea/5106.

  • Mihailova, Mihaela. 2013. “The Mastery Machine: Digital Animation and Fantasies of Control.” Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 8 (2): 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, Gillian. 1980. The Arts and Crafts Movement: A Study of Its Sources, Ideals and Influence on Design Theory. London: Studio Vista.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repair Cafe. 2018. “About.” Repair Cafe. https://repaircafe.org/en/about/.

  • Ruskin, John. 1892. The Nature of Gothic: A Chapter of the Stones of Gothic. Edited by William Morris. London: George Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoreditch Sisters Women’s Institute. 2017. “About Us.” Shoreditch Sisters Women’s Institute. https://shoreditchsisterswi.com/about-us/.

  • Smith, Vicky. 2015. “The Animator’s Body in Expanded Cinema.” Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 10 (3): 222–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. “Noisy, Licking, Dribbling and Spitting.” Animate Projects. http://animateprojectsarchive.org/films/by_date/2016/noisy_licking_dribbling_and_spitting.

  • Takahashi, Tess. 2005. “Meticulously, Recklessly Worked Upon: Direct Animation, the Auratic and the Index.” In The Sharpest Point: Animation at the End of Cinema, edited by Chris Gehman and Steve Reinke. Toronto: YYZ Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E.P. 1980. The Making of the English Working Class. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Busch, Otto. 2014. “Crafting Resistance.” In Craftivism: The Art of Craft and Activism, edited by Betty Greer. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, Alan. 2016. “Spectacle, Speculation, Spam.” In Edges: An Animation Seminar. Whitechapel Gallery: Edge of Frame. https://vimeo.com/194963450.

  • Websdale, Neil. 2001. Policing the Poor: From Slave Plantation to Public Housing. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Richard. 2001. The Animator’s Survival Kit: A Manual of Methods, Principles and Formulas for Classical, Computer, Games, Stop Motion and Internet Animators. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birgitta Hosea .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hosea, B. (2019). Made by Hand. In: Ruddell, C., Ward, P. (eds) The Crafty Animator. Palgrave Animation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13943-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics