Skip to main content

Rosa Luxemburg on the Dialectic of Spontaneous and Party Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The German Revolution and Political Theory

Part of the book series: Marx, Engels, and Marxisms ((MAENMA))

  • 720 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter distinguishes between two approaches to spontaneous politics, as moment and as beginning, and it identifies their limits. It argues that whereas the first approach (exemplified in the work of Wolin and Rancière) empties spontaneous politics of its creative potential, the second approach (exemplified in the work of Hardt and Negri) asserts the creativity of spontaneous politics, yet reduces it to one form: self-activity. Seeking to escape the narrowness of these two projections of radical democracy, the paper turns to Rosa Luxemburg’s work. It argues that in the synthesis she draws between spontaneity and organisation, reform and revolution, we find a third option for radical politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dean, Jodi. 2009. Politics Without Politics. Parallax 15 (3): 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Jodi. 2016. Crowds and Party. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douzinas, Costas, and Joanna Bourke. 2012. A Syriza Victory Will Mark the Beginning of the End of Greece’s Tragedy. The Guardian, June 17. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/17/syriza-victory-greece-austerity-crisis. Accessed 14 July 2013.

  • Frölich, Paul. 2010. Rosa Luxemburg Speaks, trans. J. Hoornweg. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geras, Norman. 1973. Rosa Luxemburg: Barbarism and the Collapse of Capitalism. New Left Review 82: 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glückstein, Donny. 2012. Standing the Test of Time: Reform or Revolution. Critique 40 (3): 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Hamish Hamilton, Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2009. Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2012. Declaration. New York: Argo Navis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2017. Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kateb, George. 2001. Wolin as a Critic of Democracy. In Democracy and Vision: Sheldon Wolin and the Vicissitudes of the Political, ed. W. E. Connolly and A. Botwinick, 39–57. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kioupkiolis, Alexandros. 2018. Movements Post-hegemony: How Contemporary Collective Action Transforms Hegemonic Politics. Social Movement Studies 17 (1): 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levant, Alex. 2012. Rethinking Spontaneity Beyond Classical Marxism: Re-reading Luxemburg Through Benjamin, Gramsci and Thompson. Critique 40 (3): 367–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, Georg. 1968. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics, trans. R. Livingstone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 2008a. Reform or Revolution. In The Essential Rosa Luxemburg, ed. H. Scott, 37–104. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 2008b. The Mass Strike. In The Essential Rosa Luxemburg, ed. H. Scott, 105–181. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 2010a. The French Revolution. In Socialism or Barbarism, ed. P. Le Blanc and H. Scott, 39–45. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 2010b. Organisational Questions of Russian Social Democracy. In Socialism or Barbarism, ed. P. Le Blanc and H. Scott, 81–102. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 2010c. Theory and Practice. In Socialism or Barbarism, ed. P. Le Blanc and H. Scott, 145–165. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 2010d. The Russian Revolution. In Socialism or Barbarism, ed. P. Le Blanc and H. Scott, 223–237. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchart, Oliver. 2007. Post-foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Memos, Christos. 2012. Crisis of Theory, Subversive Praxis and Dialectical Contradictions: Notes on Luxemburg and the Anti-capitalist Movement. Critique 40 (3): 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, Jon. 2018. Rosa Luxemburg and the Struggle for Democratic Renewal. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papastergiadis, Nikos, and Charles Esche. 2013. Assemblies in Art and Politics: An Interview with Jacques Rancière. Theory, Culture and Society 31 (7–8): 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentoulis, Marina, and Lasse Thomassen. 2013. Political Theory in the Square: Protest, Representation and Subjectification. Contemporary Political Theory 12 (3):166–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. 1999. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, trans. J. Rose. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. 2001. Ten Theses on Politics. Theory and Event 5 (3). Project MUSE. https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2001.0028.

  • Rancière, Jacques. 2006. Hatred of Democracy, trans. S. Corcoram. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. 2012. Entrevista a Jacques Rancière: Hablar De Crisis De La Sociedad Es Cuplar A Sus Víctimas. Público, January 15. https://www.publico.es/culturas/hablar-crisis-sociedad-culpar-victimas.html. Accessed 29 June 2013.

  • Tormey, Simon. 2006. Not in My Name: Deleuze, Zapatismo and the Critique of Representation. Parliamentary Affairs 59 (1): 138–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tormey, Simon. 2012. Occupy Wall Street: From Representation to Post-representation. Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies 5: 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trend, David. 1996. Radical Democracy: Identity, Citizenship and the State. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, Mary-Alice. 1970. Introduction. Rosa Luxemburg Speaks, 7–49. New York: Pathfinder Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Bertram. 1961. Rosa Luxemburg and V. I. Lenin: The Opposite Poles of Revolutionary Socialism. The Antioch Review 21 (2): 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, Sheldon. 1996. Fugitive Democracy. In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. S. Benhabib, 31–45. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, Sheldon. 2006. Agitated Times. Parallax 11 (4): 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, Sheldon. 2008. Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 2012. The Year of Dreaming Dangerously. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulina Tambakaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tambakaki, P. (2019). Rosa Luxemburg on the Dialectic of Spontaneous and Party Politics. In: Kets, G., Muldoon, J. (eds) The German Revolution and Political Theory. Marx, Engels, and Marxisms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13917-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics