An Activist, Feminist Group Co-facilitation Model and Its Influence on Field

  • Dana MyrtenbaumEmail author
  • Noor Falah


The study aims to lay out and conceptualize the feminist legal co-facilitation model that was developed during the program Women Legal Leaders & Legal Feminism Clinic in the University of Haifa. The program worked to promote the voices of Jewish and Palestinian-Israeli women from disadvantaged backgrounds in the legal and public spheres and create a space in which the women legal leaders would transfer their priorities for activism from the personal to the political realm in the form of advocacy. Thus, during the program, the participants encountered other activist women by volunteering in feminist organizations from the extensive feminist network in the city of Haifa and from the Itach-Ma’aki organization.


  1. Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. (Eds.). (2010). Multicultural Education, Issues and Perspectives. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Bar-Tal, D. (2004). Nature, Rationale and Effectiveness of Education for Coexistence. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clifford, V. (2001). Provoking Change. A Feminist, Collaborative Process of Academic Development. In G. Howie (Ed.), Gender, Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Freire, P. (1992). Pedagogy of Hope. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Freire, P., & Shor, I. (1987). A Pedagogy for Liberation: Dialogues on Transforming Education. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Halabi, R., & Reich, D. (2004). Israeli and Palestinian Identities in Dialogue: The School for Peace Approach. New Brunswicke, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Holstein, A. J., & Gubrium, J. F. (1997). The New Language of Qualitative Method. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Jayusi, W. (2009). Restoring the Attitudes of Peace Education Participants Through Peer Tutoring. A thesis submitted for the degree Doctor of Philosophy, University of Haifa, Haifa. [In Hebrew].Google Scholar
  10. Kenway, J., & Modra, K. (1992). Feminist Pedagogy and Emancipatory Possibilities. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminism and Critical Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Kupermintz, H., & Salomon, G. (2004). Lessons to Be Learned from Research on Peace Education in the Context of Intractable Conflict. Theory into Practice, 44(4), 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rose, S. (1989). The Protest as a Teaching Technique for Promoting Feminist Activism. NWSA Journal, 1(3), 486–490.Google Scholar
  13. Sagy, S., Steinberg, S., & Diab, K. (2006). The Impact of the Political Context on Discourse Characteristics in Jewish–Arab Encounters in Israel: Between Peace Talks and Violent Events. Mifgash, 24, 9–30. [In Hebrew].Google Scholar
  14. Salomon, G. (2006). Does Peace Education Really Make a Difference? Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 12(1), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shor, I. (1992). Empowering Education: Critical Teaching for Social Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shrewsbury, C. M. (1987). What Is Feminist Pedagogy? Women’s Studies Quarterly, 15(3/4), 6–14.Google Scholar
  17. Wetherall, M., Stephanie, S., Taylor, A., & Yates, S. (2001). Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City for All—Gender Mainstreaming in Local Authorities in Israel Program, Itach-Maaki Women Lawyers for Social JusticeHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Itach-Maaki OrganizationHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations