Skip to main content

Toward Large-Scale Logistics Interoperability Based on an Analysis of Available Open Standards

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Interoperability VIII

Part of the book series: Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences ((IESACONF,volume 9))

Abstract

Data sharing is important to optimize and manage logistics chains. Open standards have been developed and implemented by various logistics stakeholders. These implementations have led to closed solutions with barriers to change and implement innovative concepts like synchromodality. This paper analyzes the implementation of open standards by providing an overview of available open standards based on different implementation strategies for logistics. It reflects the state of the art of business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-government (B2G) interoperability in international trade and logistics. An analysis of the underlying problem and a proposal for a solution to create a system-of-systems for data sharing in supply and logistics with key elements of the Industrial Data Space are presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biggs, P., Johnson, T., Lozanova, Y., & Sundberg, N. (2012). Emerging issues for a hyperconnected world. The global information technology report, pp. 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Montreuil, B., Meller, R. D., & Ballot, E. (2013). Physical internet foundations. In: Service orientation in holonic and multi agent manufacturing robots (pp. 151–166). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Otto, B., Jürjens, J., Auer, S., Menz, N., Schon, J., Wenzel, S., & Cirullies J. (2016) Industrial data space—digital sovereignity over data. Fraunhofer-Gezsellschaft zur Forderung der angewandten Forschung e.V., München.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McFarlane, D., Giannikas, V., & Lu, W. (2016). Intelligent logistics: Involving the customer. Computers in Industry, 81, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, W., Tolk, A., & Wang, W. (2009). The levels of conceptual interoperability model: Applying systems engineering principles to M&S. In Spring Simulation Multiconference.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Digital Transport and Logistics Forum (DTLF). (2017). An outline for a generic concept for an innovative approach to interoperability in supply and logistics chains, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  8. European Union. (2017). New European Interoperability Framework—Promoting seamless services and data flows for European Public Administrations. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erl, T. (2005). Service oriented architecture—Concepts, technology and design. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heath, T., & Bizer, C. (2011). Linked data—Evolving the web into a global data space. In: Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: Theory and technology. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barros, A., & Oberle, D. (2012). Handbook of service description—USDL and its methods. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  12. International Organisation for Standardisation. (2017). ISO 9735:1988—Electronic data interchange for administration, commerce and transport (EDIFACT)—Application level syntax rules, 1988. [Online]. Retrieved October 27, 2017 from iso.org.

    Google Scholar 

  13. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), 2005. [Online]. Retrieved October 27, 2017 from www.unece.org.

  14. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). (2017). Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (5th ed.), 26 11 2008. [Online]. Retrieved October 27, 2017 from www.w3c.org.

  15. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). (2017). XML Schema Current Status, 5 4 2012. [Online]. Retrieved October 27, 2017 from www.w3c.org.

  16. Object Management Group (OMG). (2017). About the Unified Modeling Language Specification version 2.5, 5 2015. [Online]. Retrieved October 27, 2017 from www.omg.org.

  17. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). (2017). Web Ontology Language OWL, 11 12 2012. [Online]. Retrieved October 27, 2017 from www.w3.org.

  18. Object Role Modeling—The official site for conceptual data modeling. Object Role Modeling. [Online]. Retrieved October 27, 2017 from www.orm.net.

  19. Pedersen, J. T. (2012). One Common Framework for information and communication systems in transport and logistics: Facilitating interoperability. In P. Glinska & M. Hajdul (Eds.), Sustainable transport (pp. 165–196). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dutch Organisation for Applied Science (TNO). (2017). Logistics Core Ontology. [Online]. Retrieved October 27, 2017 from ontology.tno.nl.

    Google Scholar 

  21. World Customs Organisation (WCO). (2017). WCO Data model version 3.6.0. [Online]. Retrieved October 27, 2017 from www.wcoomd.org.

  22. Fensel, D., Kerrigan, M., & Zaremba, M. (2008). Implementing semantic web services—The SESA framework. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Choudry, V. (1997). Strategic choices in the development of interorganizational information systems. Information Systems Research, 8(1).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spohrer, J. K. S. (2009). Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Design (SSMED)—An emerging discipline—Outline and References. International Journal on Information Systems in the Service Sector.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dietz, J. (2006). Enterprise ontology, theory and methodology. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Schonberger, A., Wilms, C., & Wirtz, G. (2009). A requirements analysis of Business-to-Business integration. Bamberg: Fakultat Wirschaftsinformatik und angewandte Informatik Otto-Friedrich-Universitat.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is realized by the CORE (Consistently Optimized Resilient Secure Global Supply-Chains) project funded by the EU (funding scheme: FP7-SEC-2013.2.4-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wout Hofman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hofman, W. (2019). Toward Large-Scale Logistics Interoperability Based on an Analysis of Available Open Standards. In: Popplewell, K., Thoben, KD., Knothe, T., Poler, R. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability VIII. Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13693-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13693-2_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13692-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13693-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics