Abstract
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO’s) evolution and persistence in the post-Cold War period is demonstrated by the four cases presented in this volume. Whereas previous analyses tend to treat these cases as separate watershed moments, I also posit the importance of examining the inter-conflict periods. A more complete understanding of NATO’s evolution reveals an understated element in the existing explanations of the alliance’s persistence: the role of the United States. Because the United States believed the alliance was valuable to its security and defense interests, it continued to invest in NATO, despite declining investments from the European allies and divergent attitudes regarding collective security and defense. This chapter provides a more comprehensive explanation of the incentives for the United States’ continued participation in NATO, as demonstrated in the four cases: the 1999 Kosovo intervention, the 2001 war in Afghanistan, the 2003 Iraq War, and the 2009 Libya operation. The United States pursued NATO for legitimacy enhancement and to project an image of adherence to international norms regarding international intervention. Despite its military dominance, the United States also benefitted from the military contributions of the allies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barbero, Michael (USA-Ret., Former Commander NTM-I). Interview with Author, Jan 15, 2015.
Crawford, Timothy W. 2003. Pivotal Deterrence: Third-Party Statecraft and the Pursuit of Peace. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Davidson, Jason. 2011. America’s Allies and War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Drozdiak, William. 2005. The North Atlantic Drift. Foreign Affairs 84 (1): 88–98.
Fukuyama, Francis. 2006. America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Glennon, Michael J. 1999. The New Interventionism: The Search for a Just International Law. Foreign Affairs 78 (3): 2–7.
Haass, Richard. 1997. The Reluctant Sheriff: The United States After the Cold War. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
———. 2005. The Opportunity. New York: Public Affairs.
———. 2013. Foreign Policy Begins at Home: The Case for Putting America’s House in Order. New York: Basic Books.
Ham, Carter (USA-Ret., Commander, USAFRICOM). Interview with Author. Carter Ham, Jan 19, 2015.
Hook, Steven W. 2014. U.S. Foreign Policy: The Paradox of World Power. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Sage/CQ Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1999. The Lonely Superpower. Foreign Affairs 78 (2): 35–49.
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001a. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
———. 2001b. Getting Hegemony Right. The National Interest, 63: 17–24.
———. 2008. State Power and International Institutions: America and the Logic of Economic and Security Multilateralism. In Multilateralism and Security Institutions in an Era of Globalization, ed. Dimitris Bourantonis, Kostas Ifantis, and Panayotis Tsakonas. New York: Routledge.
Joffe, Josef. 1995. ‘Bismark’ Or ‘Britain’? Toward and American Grand Strategy After Bipolarity. International Security 19 (4): 94–117.
Kagan, Robert. 2002. Power and Weakness: Why the United States and Europe See the World Differently. Policy Review 113: 3–28.
Kaplan, Robert D. 2013. The Coming Anarchy. New York: Random House.
Kennedy, Paul. 1987. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. New York: Random House.
Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discourse in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Krauthammer, Charles. 2001. The New Unilateralism (Editorial). Washington Post, June 8.
Kreps, Sarah E. 2011. Coalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions After the Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press.
Layne, Christopher. 1997. From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America’s Future Grand Strategy. International Security 22 (1): 86–124.
———. 2012. This Time It’s Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana. International Studies Quarterly 56: 203–213.
Leffler, Melvyn P. 2013. Defense on a Diet: How Budget Crises Have Improved U.S. Strategy. Foreign Affairs 92 (6): 65–76.
McCormick, James M. 1998. Interest Groups and the Media. In After the End: Making U.S. Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War World, ed. James M. Scott. Durham: Duke University Press.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Future of the American Pacifier. Foreign Affairs 80 (5): 46–61.
Nye, Joseph S. 2002. The Paradox of American Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
Program on International Policy Attitudes. Americans on Kosovo: A Study of US Public Attitudes. Last Modified May 27, 1999. http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Kosovo/Kosovo_May99/Kosovo_May99_rpt.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2015.
Snyder, Jack. 2003. Imperial Temptations. The National Interest 78, Spring.
Stavridis, James (USN-Ret., Former Commander, USEUCOM, NATO SACEUR). Interview with Author, Jan 5, 2015.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. 1999. Between a Rock and Hard Place: Assertive Multilateralism and Post-Cold War U.S. Foreign Policymaking. In After the End: Making U.S. Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War World, ed. James M. Scott, 277–304. Durham: Duke University Press.
Walt, Stephen M. 2004. The Imbalance of Power. Harvard Magazine 106 (4): 32–35.
———. 2005. Taming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy. New York: Norton.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1993. The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security 18 (2): 44–79.
Weitsman, Patricia. 2010. Wartime Alliances Versus Coalition Warfare. Strategic Studies Quarterly 4 (2): 113–138.
———. 2014. Waging War: Alliances, Coalitions, and Institutions of Interstate Violence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Zakaria, Fareed. 2008. The Future of American Power. Foreign Affairs 87 (3): 111–124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garey, J. (2020). The United States and Multilateralism. In: The US Role in NATO’s Survival After the Cold War. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13675-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13675-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13674-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13675-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)