Consumption of Protected Wildlife as Delicacy

  • Rebecca W. Y. WongEmail author
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology book series (PSGC)


The chapter of this article is situated in light of the illegal transaction of protected wildlife in China for consumption as a delicacy. In trusting the suppliers to deliver the protected wildlife they ordered, consumers face two types of risks: (a) the risk of enforcement (facing a maximum of ten years’ imprisonment) and/or (b) the risk of being cheated of their money. This chapter focuses on the second question. The consumption of protected wildlife occurs in designated restaurants, so how do consumers know for certain that the restaurants are serving the protected wildlife they ordered? Given the difficulties in distinguishing between the flavour of protected wildlife and legitimate sources of meat (this point will be elaborated on later in the chapter), what are the mechanisms that help consumers of protected wildlife trust that the restaurant is honouring their agreement? Based on qualitative interviews with consumers and suppliers of protected wildlife in China and open sources, this study concludes that consumers rely heavily on the reputation of the restaurant.


Delicacy Food Trust Consumption of protected wildlife 


  1. Aldridge, J., & Askew, R. (2017). Delivery dilemmas: How drug cryptomarket users identify and seek to reduce their risk of detection by law enforcement. International Journal of Drug Policy, 41, 101–109. Scholar
  2. BBC News. (2014). Jail for eaters of endangered wild animals in China. Retrieved from
  3. Beckert, J., & Wehinger, F. (2013). In the shadow: Illegal markets and economic sociology. Socio-economic Review, 11(1), 5–30. Scholar
  4. Boivin, R. (2014). Risks, prices, and positions: A social network analysis of illegal drug trafficking in the world-economy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(2), 235–243. Scholar
  5. Bouchard, M. (2007). On the resilience of illegal drug markets. Global Crime, 8(4), 325–344. Scholar
  6. Braga, A. A., Wintemute, G. J., Pierce, G. L., Cook, P. J., & Ridgeway, G. (2012). Interpreting the empirical evidence on illegal gun market dynamics. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 89(5), 779–793. Scholar
  7. Buddhachat, K., Brown, J. L., Thitaram, C., Klinhom, S., & Nganvongpanit, K. (2017). Distinguishing real from fake ivory products by elemental analyses: A Bayesian hybrid classification method. Forensic Science International, 272, 142–149. Scholar
  8. Campana, P., & Varese, F. (2013). Cooperation in criminal organizations: Kinship and violence as credible commitments. Rationality and Society, 25, 263–289. Scholar
  9. Challender, D., Waterman, C., & Baillie, J. (2014). Scaling up pangolin conservation: IUCN SSC pangolin specialist group conservation action plan. London: Zoological Society of London.Google Scholar
  10. China Daily. (2014). Penalty enhanced for killing, eating endangered species. Retrieved from
  11. Chow, A. T., Cheung, S., & Yip, P. K. (2014). Wildlife markets in South China. Human-Wildlife Interactions, 8(1), 108–112.Google Scholar
  12. CITES. (2011). Asian snake trade focus of discussions in China. Retrieved from
  13. Copes, H., & Miller, M. (2015). The Routledge handbook of qualitative criminology. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Cunningham, A., Turvey, S., Zhou, F., Meredith, H., Guan, W., Liu, X., et al. (2016). Development of the Chinese giant salamander Andrias davidianus farming industry in Shaanxi Province, China: Conservation threats and opportunities. Oryx, 50(2), 265–273. Scholar
  15. Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 49–72). Oxford : Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Décary-Hétu, D., & Dupont, B. (2013). Reputation in a dark network of online criminals. Global Crime, 14(2–3), 175–196. Scholar
  17. Décary-Hétu, D., & Leppänen, A. (2016). Criminals and signals: An assessment of criminal performance in the carding. Security Journal, 29(3), 442–460. Scholar
  18. Densley, J. A., & Stevens, A. (2015). ‘We’ll show you gang’: The subterranean structuration of gang life in London. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 15(1), 102–120. Scholar
  19. Denton, B., & O’Malley, P. (1999). Gender, trust and business: Women drug dealers in the illicit economy. British Journal of Criminology, 39(4), 513–530. Scholar
  20. Dupont, B., Côté, A.-M., Savine, C., & Décary-Hétu, D. (2016). The ecology of trust among hackers. Global Crime, 17(2), 129–151. Scholar
  21. Eliason, S. L. (2010). Trophy poaching: A routine activities perspective. Deviant Behavior, 33(1), 72–87. Scholar
  22. Forsyth, C. J. (1993a). Chasing and catching “bad guys”: The game warden’s prey. Deviant Behavior, 14(3), 209–226. Scholar
  23. Forsyth, C. J. (1993b). Factors influencing game wardens in their interaction with poachers: The use of discretion. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 21(1), 51–56.Google Scholar
  24. Forsyth, C. J., & Forsyth, Y. A. (2009). Dire and sequestered meetings: The work of game wardens. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(3–4), 213–223. Scholar
  25. Forsyth, C. J., Gramling, R., & Wooddell, G. (1998). The game of poaching: Folk crimes in Southwest Louisiana. Society & Natural Resources, 11(1), 25–38. Scholar
  26. Gambetta, D. (Ed.). (1989). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Gao, Y., & Clark, S. G. (2014). Elephant ivory trade in China: Trends and drivers. Biological Conservation, 180, 23–30. Scholar
  28. Gong, S.-P., Chow, A. T., Fong, J. J., & Shi, H.-T. (2009). The chelonian trade in the largest pet market in China: Scale, scope and impact on turtle conservation. Oryx, 43(02), 213–216. Scholar
  29. Guangzhou Daily. (2014). Yellow-breasted buntings’ cousins victimised. Guangzhou Daily. Retrieved from
  30. Jacobs, B. A. (2006). The case for dangerous fieldwork. In D. Hobbs & R. Wright (Eds.), The Sage handbook of fieldwork (pp. 157–168). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Lemieux, A. M. (2014). Situational prevention of poaching. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Liu, F., McShea, W. J., Garshelis, D. L., Zhu, X., Wang, D., & Shao, L. (2011). Human-wildlife conflicts influence attitudes but not necessarily behaviors: Factors driving the poaching of bears in China. Biological Conservation, 144, 538–547. Scholar
  33. Lusthaus, J. (2012). Trust in the world of cybercrime. Global Crime, 13(2), 71–94. Scholar
  34. Mieczkowski, T. (1994). The experiences of women who sell crack: Some descriptive data from the Detroit crack ethnography project. Journal of Drug Issues, 24(2), 227–248. Scholar
  35. Mohamed, A. R., & Fritsvold, E. (2006). Damn, it feels good to be a gangsta: The social organization of the illicit drug trade servicing a private college campus. Deviant Behavior, 27(1), 97–125. Scholar
  36. Moreto, W. D., & Lemieux, A. M. (2015). Poaching in Uganda: Perspectives of law enforcement rangers. Deviant Behavior, 36(11), 853–873. Scholar
  37. Natarajan, M. (2010). International crime and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nijman, V., Oo, H., & Shwe, N. M. (2017). Assessing the illegal bear trade in Myanmar through conversations with poachers: Topology, perceptions, and trade links to China. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22(2), 172–182. Scholar
  39. Nijman, V., Zhang, M. X., & Shepherd, C. R. (2016). Pangolin trade in the Mong La wildlife market and the role of Myanmar in the smuggling of pangolins into China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 5, 118–126. Scholar
  40. Paoli, L. (2014). The Oxford handbook of organized crime. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Phelps, J., & Webb, E. L. (2015). “Invisible” wildlife trades: Southeast Asia’s undocumented illegal trade in wild ornamental plants. Biological Conservation, 186, 296–305. Scholar
  42. Polsky, N. (Ed.). (1967). Hustlers, beats and others. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  43. Ruggiero, V., & South, N. (1995). Eurodrugs: Drug use, markets and trafficking in Europe. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sales, P., & Murphy, S. (2012). ‘How do you get them to talk to you?’ Interviewing drug sellers in the San Francisco Bay area. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 19(6), 453–461. Scholar
  45. Sandberg, S. (2012). The importance of culture for cannabis markets: Towards an economic sociology of illegal drug markets. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1133–1151. Scholar
  46. Smith, A., & Varese, F. (2001). Payment, protection and punishment: The role of information and reputation in the mafia. Rationality and Society, 13(3), 349–393. Scholar
  47. South China Morning Post. (2018a). Where battle to curb shark fin consumption is being won and lost, and why trade has to stop—New research. Retrieved from
  48. South China Morning Post. (2018b). ‘15,000 pangolins slaughtered’ for 7 tonnes of scales seized in China. Retrieved from
  49. Tennie, C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Reputation management in the age of the world-wide web. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(11), 482–488. Scholar
  50. The Guardian. (2014). China hopes to take rare animals off the menu with tough jail sentences. Retrieved from
  51. TRAFFIC. (2010). Understanding the motivations: The first step toward influencing China’s unsustainable wildlife consumption. Retrieved from
  52. van Uhm, D., & Siegel, D. (2016). The illegal trade in black caviar. Trends in Organized Crime, 19(1), 67–87. Scholar
  53. Varese, F. (2001). The Russian mafia: Private protection in a new market economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vipin, V., Sharma, C. P., Sharma, V. P., Kumar, S. P., & Goyal, S. P. (2016). Pioneer identification of fake tiger claws using morphometric and DNA-based analysis in wildlife forensics in India. Forensic Science International, 266, 226–233. Scholar
  55. von Lampe, K., Kurti, M. K., Shen, A., & Antonopoulow, G. A. (2012). The changing role of China in the global illegal cigarette trade. International Criminal Justice Review, 22(1), 43–67. Scholar
  56. von Lampe, K., & Ole Johansen, P. (2004). Organized Crime and Trust: On the conceptualization and empirical relevance of trust in the context of criminal networks. Global Crime, 6(2), 159–184. Scholar
  57. Wang, P. (2014). Extra-legal protection in China: How Guanxi distorts China’s legal system and facilitates the rise of unlawful protectors. The British Journal of Criminology, 54(5), 809–830. Scholar
  58. Wang, P., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2015). Organized crime and illegal gambling: How do illegal gambling enterprises respond to the challenges posed by their illegality in China? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 49(2), 258–280. Scholar
  59. Warchol, G., & Harrington, M. (2016). Exploring the dynamics of South Africa’s illegal abalone trade via routine activities theory. Trends in Organized Crime, 19(1), 21–41. Scholar
  60. WildAid. (2018). Sharks in crisis: Evidence of positive behavioural change in China as new threats emerge. Retrieved from
  61. Wong, R. W. Y. (2015a). A note on fieldwork in “dangerous” circumstances: Interviewing illegal tiger skin suppliers and traders in Lhasa. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. Scholar
  62. Wong, R. W. Y. (2015b). The organization of the illegal tiger parts trade in China. British Journal of Criminology, 56(5), 995–1013. Scholar
  63. Xiao, Y., & Wang, J. (2015). Moving targets: Tracking online sales of illegal wildlife products in China. TRAFFIC. Retrieved from
  64. Zhang, L., Hua, N., & Sun, S. (2008). Wildlife trade, consumption and conservation awareness in southwest China. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(6), 1493–1516. Scholar
  65. Zhang, L., Jiang, W., Wang, Q., Zhao, H., Zhang, H., Marcec, R. M., Willard, S. T., & Kouba, A. J. (2016). Reintroduction and post-release survival of a living fossil: The Chinese giant salamander. PLoS, 11(6). Scholar
  66. Zhang, L., & Yin, F. (2014). Wildlife consumption and conservation awareness in China: A long way to go. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23(9), 2371–2381. Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations