Advertisement

The Transformation Problem and Value-Form: Methodological Comments

  • Pertti Honkanen
Chapter

Abstract

The discussions and debates Marx’s theory of value and especially the so-called transformation problem have been very protracted. The discussion raises many methodological and principal problems. An important starting point is Marx’s outline parsing the value theory in the questions about the substance, measure, and form of value. In the debates some of these aspects are often overestimated to the detriment of others. If the focus is in the form of value, the measure, the substance, and the material conditions of the valorization process are sometimes underestimated. If on the other hand the technical conditions of the process of production are emphasized, the changes and metamorphosis in the form of value is often ignored or neglected. The difficulty is obviously in finding the right path to the synthesis of these various aspects in the theory of value. In this article, some methodological problems are touched, especially those connected with the reproduction schemes and linear production models and the relation of “simultaneous” and “sequential” reasoning as well as with the “monetary” theory of value.

References

  1. Alcouffe, A. (1985). Marx, Hegel et le “Calcul”. In Les manuscripts mathématiques de Marx. Étude et présentation par Alain Alcouffe. Paris: Économica.Google Scholar
  2. Alcouffe, A. (2005). Économie et Mathématiques das les travaux de Marx. MEGA-Studien 2001 (pp. 142–165). Amsterdam: Internationale Marx-Engels Stiftung. Google Scholar
  3. Alcouffe, A., & Wells, J. (2009). Marx, Maths, and MEGA 2 (Unpublished Draft Written to European Society for the History of Economic Thought Conference in Thessaloniki).Google Scholar
  4. Backhaus, H.-G. (1997). Dialektik der Wertform. Untersuchungen zur marxschen Ökonomiekritik. Freiburg: Ça ira Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Bonefeld, W. (2010). Abstract Labour: Against Its Nature and on Its Time. Capital & Class, 34(2), 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bortkiewicz, L. v. (1907a). Wertrechnung und Preisrechnung im Marxschen System. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, XXV, 10–51, 445–488 (English translation: Bortkiewicz, Ladislaus von: Value and Price in the Marxian System. International Economic Papers No. 2. London: Macmillan, 1952).Google Scholar
  7. Bortkiewicz, L. v. (1907b). Zur Berichtigung der grundlegenden theoretischen Konstruktion von Marx im dritten Band des “Kapital”. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 34, 319–335 (English Translation as an Appendix to Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von: Karl Marx and the Close of His System [P. M. Sweezy, Ed.]. London: Merlin Press, 1975).Google Scholar
  8. Bródy, A. (1970). Proportions, Prices and Planning: A Mathematical Restatement of the Labour Theory of Value. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  9. Carchedi, A. K. G. (2009). The Fallacies of ‘New Dialectics’ and Value-Form Theory. Historical Materialism, 17, 145–169.Google Scholar
  10. Carchedi, G. (2012). Behind the Crises: Marx’s Dialectics of Value and Knowledge. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  11. Diaz, E. & Velasco, F. (2016). The Transformation of Values into Prices of Production in Marx’s Scheme of Expanded Reproduction. Review of Radical Political Economics, 48, 394–416.Google Scholar
  12. Duménil, G. (1980). De la valeur aux prix de production. Une réinterprétation de la transformation. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  13. Dunne, P. (1991). An Introduction to Quantitave Marxism. In P. Dunne (Ed.), Quantitative Marxism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Elbe, I. (2006). Zwischen Marx, Marxismus und Marxismen: Lesarten der marxschen Theorie. In J. Hoff, A. Petrioli, I. Stützle, & F. O. Wolf (Eds.), Das Kapital neu lesen - Beiträge zur radikalen Philosophie. Münster: Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  15. Foley, D. K. (1986). Understanding Capital: Marx’s Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Glombowski, J. (1983). A Marxian Model of Long Run Capitalist Development. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 43(4), 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haug, W. F. (2005). Vorlesungen zur Einführung ins “Kapital”. Hamburg: Argument.Google Scholar
  18. Haug, W. F. (2013). Das „Kapital“ lesen - aber wie? Materialien zur Philosophie und Epistemologie der marxschen Kapitalismuskritik. Hamburg: Argument.Google Scholar
  19. Heinrich, M. (2003). Die Wissenschaft vom Wert. Die Marxsche Kritik der politischen Ökonomie zwischen wissenschaftlicher Revolution und klassischer Tradition. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  20. Heinrich, M. (2004). Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Schmetterling Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Heinrich, M. (2009a). Reconstruction or Deconstruction? Methodological Controversies About Value and Capital, and New Insights from the Critical Edition. In R. Bellofiore & R. Fineschi (Eds.), Re-reading Marx: New Perspectives After the Critical Edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Heinrich, M. (2009b). Wie das Marxsche “Kapital” lesen? Teil I. Leseanleitung und Kommentar zum Anfang des “Kapital”. Stuttgart: Schmetterling Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Heinrich, M. (2012). An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  24. Howard, M. C., & King, J. E. (1987). Dr Mühlpfort, Professor von Bortkiewicz and the ‘Transformation Problem’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 11, 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jorland, G. (1995). Le paradoxes du capital. Paris: Éditions Odile Jacobs.Google Scholar
  26. Kay, G. (1999). Abstract Labour and Capital. Historical Materialism, 5(1), 255–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kicillof, A., & Starosta, G. (2011). On Value and Abstract Labour: A Reply to Werner Bonefeld. Capital & Class, 35(2), 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kliman, A. (2007). Reclaiming Marx’s “Capital”: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  29. Krämer, R. (2006). Wert-Bedeutung: Thesen zur Werttheorie. In J. Hoff, A. Petrioli, I. Stützle, & F. O. Wolf (Eds.), Das Kapital neu lesen – Beiträge zur radikalen Philosophie. Münster: Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  30. Laibman, D. (2000). Rhetoric and Substance in Value Theory: An Appraisal of the New Orthodox Marxism. Science & Society, 64(3), 310–332.Google Scholar
  31. Likitkijsomboon, P. (1995). Marxian Theories of Value-Form. Review of Radical Political Economics, 27(2), 73–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics (Vol. I). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Martineu, J. (2015). Time, Capitalism and Alienation: A Socio-Historical Inquiry into the Making of the Modern Time. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  34. Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse. Harmondosworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  35. MECW = Marx, Karl & Engels, Friedrich: Collected Works. London, Different Years.Google Scholar
  36. Meek, R. L. (1956). Some Notes on the “Transformation Problem”. The Economic Journal, 66, 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MEGA = Marx, Karl & Engels, Friedrich: Gesamtausgabe. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, Different Years.Google Scholar
  38. MEW = Marx, Karl & Engels, Friedrich: Werke. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, Different Years.Google Scholar
  39. Mori, K. (2006). Eine dogmenhistorische Dualität in der Reproduktions- und Preistheorie: Georg von Charasoff and Kei Shibata. In Marx-Engels-Jahrbuch 2006. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  40. Mori, K. (2012). Six-Sector Model of Production and Monetary Circuit: Making Sense of Marx’s Original Reproduction Schemata (Discussion Paper No. 278). http://www.econ.tohoku.ac.jp/e-dbase/dp/terg/terg278.pdf.
  41. Morishima, M. (1974). Marx’s Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Moseley, F. (1998). Marx’s Reproduction Schemes and Smith’s Dogma. In C. J. Arthur & G. Reuten (Eds.), The Circulation of Capital: Essays on Volume Two of Marx’s Capital. Houndmills: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  43. Moseley, F. (2016). Money and Totality: A Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx’s Logic in Capital and the End of ‘Transformation Problem’. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  44. Mühlpfor[d]t, [Wolfgang] (1896). Karl Marx und die Durchschnittprofitrate. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 65, 92–99.Google Scholar
  45. Postone, M. (1996). Time, Labor and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Quaas, F. (1991). Wolfgang Mühlpfordt – ein Vorgänger von Bortkiewicz? Zu den theoretischen Quellen des sogenannten Transformationsproblems. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 208(5), 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Quaas, F. (1992). Das Transformationsproblem. Ein theoriehistorischer Beitrag zur Analyse der Quellen und Resultate seiner Diskussion. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
  48. Quaas, G. (2001). Arbeitsquantentheorie. Mathematische Grundlagen der Werttheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  49. Quaas, G. (2016). Die ökonomische Theorie von Karl Marx. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
  50. Ravagnani, F. (2005). A Critical Note on Moseley’s ‘Macro-Monetary’ Interpretation of Marx’s Theory. Review of Radical Political Economy, 37(1), 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Samuelson, P. A. (1974). Marx as Mathematical Economist: Steady-State and Exponential Growth Equilibrium. In G. Horwich & P. A. Samuelson (Eds.), Trade, Stability and Macroeconomics: Essays in Honor of Lloyd A. Metzler. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Shaikh, A. (1977). Marx’s Theory of Value and the ‘Transformation Problem’. In J. Schwartz & S. Monica (Eds.), The Subtle Anatomy of Capitalism. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  53. Shibata, K. (1933). The Meaning of the Theory of Value in Theoretical Economics. Kyoto University Economic Review, 8, 49–68.Google Scholar
  54. Smolinski, L. (1973). Karl Marx and Mathematical Economics. Journal of Political Economy, 81(5), 1189–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Steedman, I. (1978). Marx After Sraffa. London: NLB.Google Scholar
  56. Stützle, I. (2006). Die Frage nach der konstitutiven Relevanz der Geldware in Marx’ Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. In J. Hoff, A. Petrioli, I. Stützle, & F. O. Wolf (Eds.), Das Kapital neu lesen – Beiträge zur radikalen Philosophie. Münster: Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  57. Taylor, N. (2004). Reconstructing Marx and Money and the Measurement of Value. In R. Bellofiore & N. Taylor (Eds.), Essays on Volume I of Marx’s Capital. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. Tugan-Baranowsky, M. (1905). Theoretische Grundlagen des Marxismus. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  59. von Charasoff, G. (1909). Karl Marx über die menschliche und kapitalistische Wirtschaft: eine neue Darstellung seiner Lehre. Berlin: Hans Bond.Google Scholar
  60. Winternitz, J. (1948). Values and Prices: A Solution of the So-Called Transformation Problem. The Economic Journal, 58(230), 276–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zelený, J. (1972). Die Wissenschaftslogik bei Marx und “Das Kapital”. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt (Original O Logické Strukture Marxova Kapitálu, 1962).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pertti Honkanen
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Insurance Institution of FinlandHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations