Advertisement

What If Our Schools Are Working? Base, Superstructure, and Hegemony in Education

  • Alan SingerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

American schools are working exactly the way they are intended to work. The modern public education system developed to serve the managerial needs of industrial capitalism in the first half of the nineteenth century. It reached maturity along with the economic system as the factory-model in the 1920s and has changed very little since. As education became more regimented to meet the workforce needs of industrial capitalism, high schools became key areas for indoctrination and sorting, especially for urban immigrant populations. In recent decades, as automation, robotics, and globalization have decreased the need for unskilled and semi-skilled labor, three trends have added to the capitalist nature of miseducation in the United States—zero tolerance criminal justice, high-stakes testing, and charter schools. American schools do however allow some space for promoting progressive change. Marxists can support the development of students from disadvantaged backgrounds as Gramscian organic intellectuals of the working class.

References

  1. Alexander, M. (2010). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  2. Althusser, L. (1969). For Marx, Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, W., Finn, C., & Cribb, J. (2000). The Educated Child: A Parents Guide from Preschool Through Eighth Grade. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  4. Commission on the Reorganization of Secondary Education. (1918). Cardinal Principles of Secondary Education, Bulletin, 1918, No. 35. National Education Association, Department of the Interior Bureau of Education, Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  5. Cremin, L. (1961). The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education, 1876–1957. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  6. Dickens, C. (1973). Hard Times. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  7. Ferris Bueller’s Day Off Script. (1986). http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/f/ferris-buellers-day-off-script.html. Accessed Online on April 4, 2017.
  8. Giroux, H. (1988). Teachers as Intellectuals: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  9. Goldfarb, D. (2006). The American Constitution and the Debate Over Originalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gray, K. (1993). Why We Will Lose: Taylorism in America’s High Schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 74 (5), 370–374.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, M. (1969). Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture. Palo Alto: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hirsch, E. D. (1987). Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  13. Hirsch, E. D. (1996). The Schools We Need: And Why We Don’t Have Them. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  14. Hoare, Q., & Smith G. (Ed.). (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hoppus, J. (1847). The Crisis of Popular Education: Its Historical, Internal, Statistical, Financial, and Political Relations. Including a Consideration of the “Minutes of the Committee of Council on Education”, and of the Educational Controversy, in General. London: J. Snow.Google Scholar
  16. Kleibard, H. (1987). The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893–1958. Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Kohl, H. (1991). I Won’t Learn from You: And Other Thoughts on Creative Maladjustment. New Press: New Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lukács, G. (1972). History and Class Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mirel, J. (2006, Winter). The Traditional High School: Historical Debates Over Its Nature and Function. Education Next, 6(1), 4–21.Google Scholar
  20. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983, April). A Nation at Risk: The Imperative of Educational Reform. National Commission on Excellence in Education.Google Scholar
  21. Oakes, J. (1985). Keep Tracking: How Schools Structure Inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Obama, B. (2009, July 14). President’s Remarks in Warren, Michigan. The White House. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/realitycheck/the-press-office/excerpts-presidents-remarks-warren-michigan-and-fact-sheet-american-graduation-init. Accessed Online on March 27, 2017.
  23. Poulantzas, N. (1979). The Political Crisis and the Crisis of the State. In J. W. Freiberg (Ed.), Critical Sociology. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  24. Public School Society of New-York. (1850). A Manual of the System of Discipline and Instruction. New York: Egbert, Hovey & King.Google Scholar
  25. Ravitch, D., & Finn C. (1987). What Do our 17-Year Olds Know? A Report on the First National Assessment of History and Literature. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  26. Reigart, J. (1916). The Lancasterian System of Instruction in the Schools of New York City, Issue 81. New York City: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  27. Shapiro, H. S. (1980, August). Education and the State in Capitalist Society: Aspects of the Sociology of Nico Poulantzas. Harvard Educational Review, 50(3): 321–331.Google Scholar
  28. Singer, A. (2014). Education Flashpoints: Fighting for America’s Schools. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Singer, A. (2016, November 28). Trump Moves to Destroy Public Education. Huffington Post. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-singer/trump-moves-to-destroy-pu_b_13277736.html. Accessed Online on March 3, 2018.
  30. Spring, J. (2013). American Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  31. Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shock. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hofstra UniversityHempsteadUSA

Personalised recommendations