Skip to main content

Framing the Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Music, Leadership and Conflict

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Business, Arts and Humanities ((PSBAH))

  • 530 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter Ippolito introduces the conflict crisis: the inability to effectively negotiate and problem-solve in a twenty-first-century environment. Rooted in dominant culture war and game metaphors that encourage adversarial competition and define success on the basis of “winning”, Ippolito advocates for a cooperative approach to negotiation in order to achieve subjectively and contextually defined optimal outcomes. Such a paradigm shift requires a new metaphoric frame and a new pedagogical approach to negotiation and dispute resolution. To respond to the conflict crisis, Ippolito puts forward the musical ensemble as the new metaphor and model and an arts-based teaching and learning method to explore the effects of this new paradigm.

It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.

—Charles Darwin

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “First generation” pedagogy refers to a form of experiential learning that employs a combination of lectures with simulations and fish-bowl exercises designed to teach diagnostic, analytic and predictive skills related to negotiation. “First generation” pedagogy is employed where negotiation is conceptualized “as a strategic and instrumental process” (Fox 2009, 13). Such conventional pedagogy does not venture into the realm of interdisciplinary learning, learning outside of the classroom or experimentation with hands-on learning beyond standard, “canned” role plays and skills-building exercises.

  2. 2.

    In this study, “music” is both metaphor and method. The collaborative metaphor of the ensemble is offered in place of combative and competitive metaphors most often associated with negotiation and dispute resolution. The ensemble model is not genre-specific or instrument-specific despite the fact that the students in the study were exposed to a classical String Quartet. The ensemble could equally have been a choral group, a jazz combo, a drumming or chanting circle, or any other form of self-directed instrumental, vocal or mixed instrumental/vocal group. The genre of music is likewise irrelevant to both the research study’s framework and with respect to the type of music that could be made as part of the active music-making exercises described in Chap. 4. The musicians interviewed in Chap. 2 in response to the first research question were a mixed group of instrumentalists and vocalists (some of the musicians were both), from the classical, jazz, opera and cabaret communities.

References

  • Alexander, N., and LeBaron, M. 2013. Embodied Negotiation: Resurrecting Roleplay-Based Curricula Through Dance. In C. Honeyman, J. Coben, and A. Wei-Min Lee (eds.) Educating Negotiators for a Connected World (Chapter 22). Saint Paul, MN: DRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankowski, Z., and Del Mar, M., eds. 2013. The Moral Imagination and the Legal Life: Beyond Text in Legal Education. Farnham: Ashgate Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankowski, Z., Del Mar, M., and Maharg, P., eds. 2012. The Arts and the Legal Academy: Beyond Text in Legal Education. Farnham: Ashgate Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J., ed. 1996. Learning: The Treasure Within: Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO Education Sector.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, N. 2007. The Brain That Changes Itself. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, N., Coben, J., and Honeyman, C., eds. 2012. Assessing Our Students, Assessing Ourselves. Saint Paul, MN: DRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Felstiner, W., Abel, R., and Sarat, A. 1980. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming and Claiming. Law and Society Review, 15(3–4), pp. 631–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, K.H. 2009. Negotiation as a Post-Modern Process. In C. Honeyman, J. Coben, and G. De Palo (eds.) Rethinking Negotiation Teaching; Innovations for Context and Culture. Saint Paul, MN: DRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J., Jacobsen, C.G., and Brand-Jacobsen, K.F. 2002. Searching for Peace: The Road to TRANSCEND. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golesworthy, T. 2011, October. Tal Golesworthy: How I Repaired My Own Heart [Video File]. Available at: https://www.ted.com/talks/tal_golesworthy_how_i_repaired_my_own_heart.

  • Honeyman, C., Coben, J., and De Palo, G., eds. 2009. Rethinking Negotiation Teaching: Innovations for Context and Culture. Saint Paul, MN: DRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honeyman, C., Coben, J., and De Palo, G., eds. 2010. Venturing Beyond the Classroom. Saint Paul, MN: DRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honeyman, C., Coben, J., and Wei-Min Lee, A., eds. 2013. Educating Negotiators for a Connected World. Saint Paul, MN: DRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito, L.M. 2012. What Happened to the “Alternative” in Alternative Dispute Resolution? Lawyers Weekly, 14 September 2012 [Online]. Available at: http://www.lawyersweekly.ca/index.php?section=article&volume=32&number=18&article=3 [Accessed 24 November 2014].

  • Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By—With a New Afterword (2003). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, M. 2002. Bridging Troubled Waters. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, M., Acland, A., and MacLeod, C., eds. 2013. The Choreography of Resolution: Conflict, Movement and Neuroscience. Chicago: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J.P. 1998. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, P.S. 2008. Competition, Cooperation, and Interconnection: ‘Metaphor Families’ and Social Systems. In G. Kristiansen and R. Dirven (eds.) Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variations, Cultural Models and Social Systems. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 483–516.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Edgar H. 2013. The Role of Art and the Artist. Organizational Aesthetics, 2(1), pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. 2005. Signature Pedagogies in the Profession. Daedalus, 134(3), pp. 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. 1998. The Argument Culture. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ippolito, L.M. (2019). Framing the Problem. In: Music, Leadership and Conflict. Palgrave Studies in Business, Arts and Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13628-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics