Skip to main content

An Analytic Model of Culture and Power

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Greek Crisis and Its Cultural Origins

Part of the book series: Cultural Sociology ((CULTSOC))

  • 215 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, ‘culture’ is defined, its place in the social division of labor specified, and also distinguished from the pursuit of power and the instrumental use of value-statements. Based upon the principles and the problematique of Shmuel Eisenstadt’s theory of multiple modernities, and using Charles Taylor’s ‘constitutive goods’, Max Weber’s ‘substantive rationality’, Emile Durkheim’s ‘collective effervescence’, and Jeffrey Alexander’s and Phillip Smith’s ‘cultural pragmatics’ to specify particular aspects of the theory, an Analytic Model for cultural research is constructed and explicated. The heart of the model is ‘cultural pragmatics’, that is the performance of symbolic codes in public dramas, which are incorporated in the self as ‘internalized code orientations’ and permeates the social networks of social power as ‘institutional ground rules’ and ‘ethical orders’. The whole study explicates this mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I base this definition of Windelband’s analysis of the Holy and its antinomian nature vis-à-vis pragmatic necessity (Windelband 2018, 305).

  2. 2.

    ‘An ‘ethical’ standard is one to which men attribute a certain type of value and which, by virtue of this belief, they treat as a valid norm governing their action’ (Weber 1978, 36).

  3. 3.

    For a striking example of two complementary cases of theoretical and substantive rationality (and their patterned combination) see Part II, Sect. 10.3.2.

  4. 4.

    Weber states this rather clearly when he argues ‘Thus, religious or magical behavior or thinking must not be set apart from the range of everyday purposive conduct, particularly since even the ends of the religious and magical actions are predominantly economic’ (Weber 1978, 400).

  5. 5.

    World III refers to objective and tangible knowledge (scientific theories, technologies, tools, social institutions, etc.) created by humans, and which, contra World II, is (partially) autonomous from human interpretation (Popper 1978).

Bibliography

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1988. Durkheimian Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. From the Depths of Despair: Performance, Counterperformance, and ‘September 11’. In Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, ed. Jeffrey C. Alexander, Bernhard Giesen, and Jason L. Mast, 91–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C., and Paul Colomy. 1985. Toward Neo-Functionalism. Sociological Theory 3 (2): 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C., and Jasson L. Mast. 2006. Introduction: Symbolic Action in Theory and Practice: The Cultural Pragmatics of SYMBOLIC action. In Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, ed. Jeffrey C. Alexander, Bernhard Giesen, and Jason L. Mast, 1–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C., and Phillip Smith. 1993. The Discourse of American Civil Society: A New Proposal for Cultural Studies. Theory and Society 22: 151–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C., Bernard Giesen, and Jason L. Mast, eds. 2006. Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert. 1967. Civil Religion in America. Daedalus 96: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Religion in Human Evolution: From the Paleolithic to the Axial Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, Craig. 1991. Morality, Identity, and Historical Explanation: Charles Taylor on the Sources of the Self. Sociological Theory 9 (2): 232–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile, and Marcel Mauss. 1963. Primitive Classification. Translated and edited by Robert Needham. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. 1963. The Political System of Empires. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Power, Trust, and Meaning: Essays in Sociological Theory and Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. The Civilizational Dimension of Modernity. International Sociology 16 (3): 320–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. New York: Longman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Ervin. 1959. The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1967. Interaction Ritual. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Lawrence, and Samuel Huntington, eds. 2001. Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. London: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Samuel G. 1828. An Historical Sketch of the Greek Revolution. New York: Gallaher and White.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalberg, Stephen. 1980. Max Weber’s Types of Rationality: Cornerstones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes in History. The American Journal of Sociology 85 (5): 1145–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. 1986. Sources of Social Power. Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The Sources of Social Power Revisited. In An Anatomy of Power: The Social Theory of Michael Mann, ed. John A. Hall and Ralph Schroeder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marangudakis, Manussos. 2015. Multiple Modernities and the Theory of Indeterminacy. In Varieties of Multiple Modernities – New Research Design, ed. Gerhard Preyer and Michael Sussmann, 48–64. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Carl. 1978. The Three Worlds. The Tanner Lecture on Human Values, Delivered at the University of Michigan. http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/p/popper80.pdf.

  • Swidler, Ann. 1986. Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review 51 (2): 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szakolczai, Arpad. 2009. Liminality and Experience: Structuring Transitory Situations and Transformative Events. International Political Anthropology 2 (1): 141–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. 2 vols. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. 2004. Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. London: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windelband, Wilhelm. 2018. Praludiean. Vol. 2. London: Forgotten Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manussos Marangudakis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marangudakis, M. (2019). An Analytic Model of Culture and Power. In: The Greek Crisis and Its Cultural Origins. Cultural Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13589-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13589-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13588-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13589-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics