Skip to main content

Privacy Literacy and the Everyday Use of Social Technologies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Literacy in Everyday Life (ECIL 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 989))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The increased privacy concerns and risks associated with the misuse of personal information collected, processed and re-purposed from various digital technologies calls for users’ understanding of their own informational privacy. While regulatory and technical mechanisms exist to protect individuals’ information privacy, these approaches have failed to be effective. This study presents the case for privacy literacy from an information literacy perspective as a complementary mechanism to the existing approaches to protecting individuals’ information privacy. The research used a constructivist paradigm, through interviewing twenty-one participants, and through online observation of SNS (social network services), and a privacy-settings walkthrough specifically on Facebook, and asking participants to track their online footprints and talk about any personal information found online.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Clarke, R.: Introduction to Dataveillance and Information Privacy, and Definitions of Terms (1999). http://www.rogerclarke.com/DV/Intro.html

  2. Sellen, A.J., Whittaker, S.: Beyond total capture: a constructive critique of lifelogging. Commun. ACM 53, 70–77 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lupton, D.: The Quantified Self. Polity Press, Malden (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kobsa, A.: Pseudonymous yet personalized interaction with websites that utilize network-wide user modeling services. In: HCIC Winter Workshop, Winter Park, CO (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Rivadulla, S.: Personalization vs. privacy. IFLA J. 42, 227–238 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Etzioni, A.: A Cyber Age Privacy Doctrine: Policy and Practice. Polgrave Macmillan, New York (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Correia, J., Compeau, D.: Information privacy awareness (IPA): a review of the use, definition and measurement of IPA. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rotman, D.: Are you looking at me? Social media and privacy literacy. In: Poster in the 4th iSchool Conference, Chapel Hill, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Veghes, C., Orzan, M., Acatrinei, C., Dugulan, D.: Privacy literacy: what is and how it can be measured? Ann. Univ. Apulensis Ser. Oeconomica 14, 704 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Givens, C.L.: Information Privacy Fundamentals for Librarians and Information Professionals. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rainie, L., Duggan, M.: Privacy and Information Sharing. Pew Research Center (2016). http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/01/14/2016/Privacy-and-Information-Sharing/

  12. Veghes, C., Popescu, I.C., Orzan, M., Acatrinei, C.: Mapping the private space of the romanian consumer: micro and macroeconomic implications. Ann. Univ. Apulensis Ser. Oeconomica 16, 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, C.L.: Privacy and trust attitudes in the intent to volunteer for data-tracking research. Inf. Res.: Int. Electron. J. 21, 32 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Acquisti, A.: Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 21–29. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Petronio, S.: Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectic of Disclosure. State University of New York Press, Albany (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Office of the Australian Information Commissioner: Australian Community Attitudes to Privacy Survey (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park, Y.J.: Digital literacy and privacy behavior online. Commun. Res. 40, 215–236 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Svantesson, D., Clarke, R.: A best practice model for e-consumer protection. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 26, 31–37 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fornaciari, F.: Pricey privacy: framing the economy of information in the digital age. First Monday 19 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Newell, P.B.: Perspectives on privacy. J. Environ. Psychol. 15, 87–104 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Warren, S., Brandeis, L.: The right to privacy. Havard Law Rev. 4(5), 193–220 (1890)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Westin, A.F.: Privacy and Freedom. Athenaeum, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Froomkin, A.M.: The death of privacy? Stanford Law Rev. 52, 1461–1543 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Haynes, D., Robinson, L.: Defining user risk in social networking services. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 67, 94–115 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Christl, W., Spiekerman, S.: Networks of Control: a Report on Corporate Surveillance, Digital Tracking, Big Data & Privacy. Facultas, Vienna (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Papacharissi, Z., Fernback, J.: Online privacy and consumer protection: an analysis of portal privacy statements. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 49, 259–281 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bandara, R., Fernando, M., Akter, S.: Is the privacy paradox a matter of psychological distance? An exploratory study of the privacy paradox from a construal level theory perspective. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Floridi, L.: Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy. Ethics Inf. Technol. 8, 109–119 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Barnes, S.B.: A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. First Monday 11 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Altman, I.: The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding. Brooks/Cole, Monterey (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Altman, I.: Privacy regulation: culturally universal or culturally specific? J. Soc. Issues 33, 66–84 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Petronio, S.: Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. Suny Press, Albany (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Metzger, M.J.: Communication privacy management in electronic commerce. J. Comput.-Med. Commun. 12, 335–361 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cox, A.M., McKinney, P., Goodale, P.: Food logging: an information literacy perspective. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 69, 184–200 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dinev, T., Hart, P.: Internet privacy concerns and social awareness as determinants of intention to transact. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 10, 7–29 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. ALA Digital Technology Taskforce: What is Digital Literacy? (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Boyd, D.: Why youth (heart) social network sites: the role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: Buckingham, D. (ed.) Macarthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning–Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume, pp. 119–142. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Marwick, A.E., Boyd, D.: Networked privacy: how teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media Soc. 16, 1051–1067 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rappa, M.: Business Models on the Web (2003). http://digitalenterprise.org

  40. Park, Y.J., Jang, S.M.: Understanding privacy knowledge and skill in mobile communication. Comput. Hum. Behav. 38, 296–303 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hargittai, E.: A framework for studying differences in people’s digital media uses. In: Kompetenzzentrum Informelle Bildung (ed.) Grenzenlose Cyberwelt, pp. 121–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90519-8_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Stvilia, B., Choi, W.: Mobile wellness application-seeking behavior by college students: an exploratory study. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 37, 201–208 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Christiansen, L.: Personal privacy and internet marketing: an impossible conflict or a marriage made in heaven? Bus. Horiz. 54, 509–514 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Williamson, K., Johanson, G.: Research Methods: Information, Systems and Contexts. Tilde Publishing, Australia (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nippert-Eng, C.E.: Islands of Privacy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Ryan, F.V.C., Cruickshank, P., Hall, H., Lawson, A.: Blurred reputations: managing professional and private information online. J. Librarianship Inf. Sci. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618769977

  48. Madden, M., Smith, A.: Reputation Management and Social Media. Pew Internet & American Life Project (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ryan, F.V., Cruickshank, P., Hall, H., Lawson, A.: Managing and evaluating personal reputations on the basis of information shared on social media: a generation x perspective. Inf. Res.-Int. Electron. J. 21 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Xia, H., Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Shah, A.: “Our privacy needs to be protected at all costs”: crowd workers’ privacy experiences on amazon mechanical turk. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact 1, 22 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Urban, J.M., Hoofnagle, C.J.: The Privacy Pragmatic as Privacy Vulnerable. UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper, no. 2514381 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zablon Pingo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pingo, Z., Narayan, B. (2019). Privacy Literacy and the Everyday Use of Social Technologies. In: KurbanoÄźlu, S., et al. Information Literacy in Everyday Life. ECIL 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 989. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13472-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13472-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13471-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13472-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics