Abstract
Although Appreciative Inquiry (AI) is often thought of as a framework used in Industrial/Organisational Psychology it has a much broader application. This chapter will focus on the applied use of AI in dealing with the ‘shame’ and ‘guilt’ experienced by individuals with HIV/AIDS in a sub-Saharan socio-economic context. The four key tenets of AI, namely: Discovery (the best of what is), Dream (what might be), Design (what should be) and Destiny (what will be) lend themselves to a reflexive approach for use in therapeutic settings. The appreciative interview, which is collaborative in nature, uses questions which are formulated so that a positive response is received. This gives clients a chance to discover positive things about themselves and their context (the client is not allowed to dwell on the negative). A second phase of discovery allows the client to reflect on satisfying moments in their lives which usually represents a strength that can be positively adapted to help them dream of a future which might be. The process continues in terms of the clients using different tools to design their provocative propositions which is their own positive statement and hope of what is or what might be. In recognizing that their destiny is not underpinned by ‘shame’ and/or guilt clients are able to deliver a positive approach (literally and metaphorically) to their lives which enables feelings of enhanced self-esteem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bushe, G. R. (2007). Appreciative inquiry is not (just) about the positive. OD Practitioner, 39(4), 30–35.
Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative Inquiry in organisational life. In R. Woodman & W. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organisational change and development (Vol. 1, pp. 129–169). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Fitzgerald, S. P., Murrell, K. I., & Miller, M. G. (2003). Appreciative inquiry: Accentuating the positive. Business Strategy Review, 14(1), 5–7.
Gutierrez, J., Albuquerque, A. A. A., & Falzon, L. (2017). HIV Infection as vascular risk: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Plos One, 12(5), e0176686.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.
Nel, K., & Govender, S. (2018). Transformative Research methods: Appreciative inquiry. In A. Fynn, S. Laher, & S. Kramer (Eds.). Social Science Research in South Africa: theory and applications. (In process) (DHET).
Nqojane, V., Nel, K. A., Tebele, C., & Vezi, M. (2011). Perceptions towards HIV and AIDS, condom use and voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) amongst students at a previously disadvantaged South African tertiary institution. Journal of Human Ecology, 37(1), 1–7.
Reed, J. (2007). Appreciative Inquiry: research for change. London: Sage.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness on depression, development and death. San Francisco: Freeman.
Shivambu, D. (2015). An investigation into psychological factors that compel battered women to remain in abusive relationships in Vhembe District, Limpopo Province. Retrieved from http://ulspace.ul.ac.za/handle/10386/1311.
Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford Press.
Tanser, F., Barnighausen, T., Grapsa, E., Zaida, J., & Newell, M. L. (2013). High coverage of ART associated with decline in risk of HIV aquistion in rural Kwa Zulu-Natal, South Africa. Science, 339, 966–971.
Tebele, C., & Nel, K. A. (2011). Appreciative inquiry: A case study of a woman’s experience of poverty. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 4, 607–609.
Williams, R. (2014). Are we hardwired to be positive or negative? On the capacity to emphasize the negative rather than the positive. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/wired-success/201406/are-we-hardwired-be-positive-or-negative.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Glossary 1—Key Terms in Appreciative Inquiry (AI)
- 4 D Cycle
-
This is the very essence of Appreciative Inquiry and can be captured as a 4D cycle which is the discovery phasedream phase, design phase and destiny phase. An appreciative enquiry emphasizes on an individual’s positive aspects and potential rather than weaknesses.
- Discovery Phase
-
This is a stage at which the direction of change is determined. This theme may be an opportunity for the individual to grow and thisis translated into an affirmative that invites formulations.
- Dream Phase
-
In this stage of the 4D cycle people are expected to collectively assess their dreams versus their achievements in relation to their lifework and ambitions.
- Design Phase
-
Drawing on the last two stagesvarious ideas and designs to implement the solutions are identified. These designs may be in the form of interventions to implement thoughts into practice and includes all steps need to make the dreams real
- Destiny Phase
-
This is the last stage of the 4D cycle whereby participants are asked to fulfill different commitments and taskswhich may result in positive changes taking place.
- Reflexivity
-
The researcher reflects on how their valuesbeliefs, experiences, interests and political orientation may affect their research.
- Co-collaboration
-
Appreciative Inquiry is a collaborative process to engage people to discover the best in their context and is applied both from individual coaching and well as in a group context.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nel, K.A., Govender, S. (2019). Dealing with Shame Using Appreciative Inquiry. In: Mayer, CH., Vanderheiden, E. (eds) The Bright Side of Shame. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13409-9_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13409-9_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13408-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13409-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)