Abstract
Active development of digital economy in Russia and across the world stimulates the usage of the robotic devices in many different areas of society. Thus arises the necessity to study the issue of the legal treatment of robots and how it corresponds to the legal status if the subjects of civil law. In this paper the possibility of granting robots the status of the subjects of the law is researched. As the robots are essentially technical devises it makes sense to view them as objects of law with specific technical specifications. Next some possibilities of robots making specific actions and thus having some characteristics of the subject of law are studied. We found out that robots (with AI or some parts of it) do possess such characteristics. However it should be noted, that despite having some characteristics of the subject of civil circulation, robots cannot be the subjects of the law as they don’t possess their own free will and thus cannot express their mental attitude towards their actions. There’s no real basis to make robots a part of civil circulation as independent and standalone subject of the law, based on the case with the legal persons. The purpose of legal persons for existing is always clear and justified by the necessity of capital aggregation or by the joint venture of physical persons. Also the legal persons take part in civil circulation via its official bodies, which may be represented by a physical person or several of them who possess their own free will and intelligence. Robots with their abilities to independently carry out some physical acts without human interference may perform specific functions as a part of the system of property relations. But despite that fact robots cannot be recognized as independent subjects of law, as their actions are always defined by their human owners who actually possess legal capacity, active capacity and delictual dispositive capacity. The methods of general scientific research (dialectic, inductive, deductive, analytic, synthetic) and specific scientific research (legalistic, interpretative) are used in this research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Zuev, A. Y. (2018). Peace and movement: The universal forms of being matter. Available at: https://www.proza.ru/2016/02/11/1833. Accessed July 27, 2018.
The Great Encyclopedic Dictionary. (2018). Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc3p/114050. Accessed July 27, 2018.
Zozuyula, Y. I. (2003). Intellectual neurosystems, Series: Neurocomputers and their application, Book: 12, Radio engineering, Moscow.
Frit, К. (2012). Brain and Soul: How nervous activity shapes our inner world. Corpus, Moscow: Astrel Publishing House.
Neural Networks, Artificial Intelligence. (2018). Available at: http://neuronus.com/stat/1295-nejronnye-seti-iskusstvennyj-intellekt.html. Accessed July 27, 2018.
Jackson, P. (2018). Introduction to expert systems. Available at: http://alt-future.narod.ru/Ai/exp.htm. Accessed July 27, 2018.
Maslov, V. M. (2014). High technology and the phenomenon of the posthuman in modern society. Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University named after R.E. Alekseev, Nizhny Novgorod, N/ Novgorod.
Turing, A. M. (2018). Can the machine think? Available at: http://w2.ict.nsc.ru/jspui/bitstream/ICT/885/6/Can_Turing.pdf. Accessed July 27, 2018.
Petrazhitsky, L. I. (2018). The theory of law and state in connection with the theory of morality. Available at: http://www.allpravo.ru/library/doc108p0/instrum4914/item4916.html. Accessed July 27, 2018.
Stepanenko, A. S. (2008). Philosophical-methodological problems of the ratio of natural and artificial intelligence. Modern technologies. System analysis. Modeling, No. 1 (pp. 171–178).
Vinge, V. (2018). What is singularity? Available at: https://www.computerra.ru/think/35636. Accessed July 27, 2018.
Uzhov, F. V. (2017). Artificial intelligence as a subject of law. Gaps in Russian legislation, No. 3 (pp. 357–360).
Gredeskul, N. A. (1900). To the doctrine of the exercise of law. The intellectual process required to exercise the right. Socio-legal research: dis. … Master of Law, Kharkiv.
Serova, O. A. (2018). Robots as participants in the digital economy: Problems of defining the legal nature. Civil law, No. 3.
Cherkasov, V. N. (2017). A new subject of law? Basis, 1, 41–44.
Inshakova, A. O., Goncharov, A. I., Mineev, O. A., & Sevostyanov, M. V. (2017). Amendments to the civil code of the Russian Federation: Contradictions of theory and practice. Contributions to Economics. Russia and the European Union: Development and Perspectives Number XIII (pp. 147–153).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kamyshansky, V.P., Rudenko, E.Y., Kolominetz, E.A., Osadchenko, E.O. (2019). Regarding the Issue of the Essence of Legal Treatment and the Possibility of Granting Legal Status to a Robot in Civil Law. In: Popkova, E. (eds) Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 826. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13396-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13397-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)