Skip to main content

The Model of Trust Management in the Age of the Internet of Things from the Positions of Various Interested Parties

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to develop a model of trust management in the age of the Internet of Things from the positions of various interested parties. Methodology: Quantitative substantiation of the existence of the problem of trust and determination of the factors of trust to digital technologies in the age of the Internet of Things are performed with the method of regression analysis. This method is used for analyzing the dependence of the share of E-trade in the general structure of retail as an indicator of public interest in digital modernization of economy and the index of society informatization as an indicator of society’s readiness for the Fourth industrial revolution on the cyber security index as an indicator of digital risks, and dependence of the digital competitiveness index as an indicator of advantages on digital modernization. The research objects are countries in which the share of E-trade was the highest in 2018—which allows covering developed and developing countries. Results: It is determined that as of now (2018, despite the high level of cyber security and digital competitiveness, the share of E-trade and level of society’s informatization are low. This proves global public mistrust to digital technologies on the whole and to the Internet of Things in particular. It is concluded that social adaptation to digital modernization of economy on the basis of the Internet of Things is largely determined by the trust, which factors are advantages that are gained from digital modernization (their indicator is the level of digital competitiveness) and digital risks (their indicator is the level of cyber security). Thus, it is necessary to control trust and overcome the social barriers on the path of the Fourth industrial revolution. Recommendations: It is recommended to use the developed and presented model of trust management in the age of the Internet of Things from the positions of various interested parties, in which the tools of management are increase of digital literacy and social advertising of the Internet of Things—for mass translation of advantages from digital modernization, and increase and high level of cyber security—for reducing the risks of this process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bogoviz, A. V. (2019). Industry 4.0 as a new vector of growth and development of knowledge economy. Studies in systems, decision and control, 169(1), 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bogoviz, A. V., Osipov, V. S., Chistyakova, M. K., & Borisov, M. Y. (2019). Comparative analysis of formation of industry 4.0 in developed and developing countries. Studies in systems, decision and control, 169(1), 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Popkova, E. G. (2017). Economic and legal foundations of modern Russian society: a new institutional theory. Advances in research on Russian business and management, Charlotte (North Carolina) USA; Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Popkova, E. G. (2019). Preconditions of formation and development of industry 4.0 in the conditions of knowledge economy. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 169, 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Popkova, E. G., Sergi, B. S. (2019). Will Industry 4.0 and Other Innovations Impact Russia’s Development?. In Exploring the future of Russia’s economy and markets (pp. 34–42), Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Popkova, E. G., Zhuravleva, I. A., Abramov, S. A., Fetisova, O. V., & Popova, E. V. (2019). Digitization of taxes as a top-priority direction of optimizing the taxation system in modern Russia. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 182, 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sukhodolov, A. P., Popkova, E. G., & Litvinova, T. N. (2018). Models of modern information economy: conceptual contradictions and practical examples (pp. 1–38). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. AlHogail, A., & AlShahrani, M. (2019). Building consumer trust to improve Internet of Things (IoT) technology adoption. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 775, 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Momani, A. M., Mahmoud, M. A., & Ahmad, M. S. (2019). A review of factors influencing customer acceptance of internet of things services. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 11(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farhan, L., & Kharel, R. (2019). Internet of Things: Vision, Future Directions and Opportunities. Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation, 29, 331–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Assante, D., Romano, E., Flamini, M., (…) Pascoal, A., & Spatafora, M. (2018). Internet of Things education: Labor market training needs and national policies. In IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 2018-April, pp. 1846–1853.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bagheri, M., & Movahed, S. H. (2017). The Effect of the Internet of Things (IoT) on Education Business Model. In Proceedings—12th International Conference on Signal Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems, SITIS 2016, 7907501, pp. 435–441.

    Google Scholar 

  13. IMD. (2018). World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2018 results. https://www.imd.org/wcc/world-competitiveness-center-rankings/world-digital-competitiveness-rankings-2018/. Data Accessed: 14.11.2018.

  14. International Telecommunication Union. (2018и). Measuring the information society report 2018. https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/idi/2017/. Data Accessed: 14.11.2018.

  15. International Telecommunication Union. (2018ф). Global Cybersecurity Index. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/str/D-STR-GCI.01-2017-PDF-E.pdf. Data Accessed: 14.11.2018.

  16. Statista. (2018). E-commerce sales as percentage of total retail sales in selected countries in 2017. https://www.statista.com/statistics/255083/online-sales-as-share-of-total-retail-sales-in-selected-countries/. Data Accessed: 14.11.2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksei V. Bogoviz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bogoviz, A.V., Tsvetkova, L.I., Bodiako, A.V., Gimelshteyn, A.V., Tretyakova, I.O. (2019). The Model of Trust Management in the Age of the Internet of Things from the Positions of Various Interested Parties. In: Popkova, E. (eds) Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 826. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_119

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics