Skip to main content

Enhancement and Application of the Flow Solver FLOWer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ' 18

Abstract

Recent enhancements and applications of the flow solver FLOWer are presented in this paper. A locally formulated laminar-turbulent transition model is implemented and used for simulations of a steady and pitching finite wing. Corresponding experimental results show good agreement on transition points. In CFD, a separation bubble is observed that triggers laminar-turbulent transition. Furthermore, the paper focuses on CFD simulations conducted on Airbus Helicopters’ compound helicopter RACER and the underlying setup, including flexible main rotor blades, engine boundary conditions and deformable flaps. Finally, interaction phenomena and interesting flow characteristics are described for hovering and cruise conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M. Alam, N.D. Sandham, Direct numerical simulation of ‘short’ laminar separation bubbles with turbulent reattachment. J. Fluid Mech. 410, 1–28 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112099008976

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Brendel, T.J. Mueller, Boundary-layer measurements on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. J. Aircr. 25(7), 612–617 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Drela, M.B. Giles, Viscous-inviscid analysis of transonic and low Reynolds number airfoils. AIAA J. 25(10), 1347–1355 (1987). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9789

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Ferguson, V. Khromov, Maneuverability assessment of a compound helicopter. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 61(1), 1–15 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.61.012008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A.D. Gardner, C.B. Merz, C.C. Wolf, Effect of sweep on a pitching finite wing. in American Helicopter Society 74th Annual Forum (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.D. Gardner, K. Richter, Boundary layer transition determination for periodic and static flows using phase-averaged pressure data. Exp. Fluids 56(6), 119 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-1992-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C.C. Heister, A. Klein, E. Krämer, RANS-Based Laminar-Turbulent Transition Prediction for Airfoil and Rotary Wing Applications Using Semi-empirical Criteria, (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2003) pp. 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35680-3_38

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, E. Turkel, Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes. in 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference (1981). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1981-1259

  9. U. Kowarsch, T. Hofmann, M. Keßler, E. Krämer, Adding hybrid mesh capability to a CFD-solver for helicopter flows. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2017), pp. 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47066-5_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Kranzinger, U. Kowarsch, M. Schuff, M. Keßler, E. Krämer, Advances in parallelization and high-fidelity simulation of helicopter phenomena. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2016), pp. 479–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24633-8_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. R.B. Langtry, F.R. Menter, Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes. AIAA J. 47(12), 2894–2906 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Letzgus, L. Dürrwächter, U. Schäferlein, M. Keßler, E. Krämer, Optimization and HPC-applications of the flow solver FLOWer. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland 2018), pp. 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68394-2

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. C.B. Merz, Der dreidimensionale dynamische Strömungsabriss an einer schwingenden Rotorblattspitze. Ph.D. thesis, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. C.B. Merz, C.C. Wolf, K. Richter, K. Kaufmann, A. Mielke, M. Raffel, Spanwise differences in static and dynamic stall on a pitching rotor blade tip model. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 62(1), 1–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.62.012002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A.M. Moodie, H. Yeo, Design of a cruise-efficient compound helicopter. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 57(3), 1–11 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.57.032004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Öhrle, F. Frey, J. Thiemeier, M. Keßler, E. Krämer, Coupled and trimmed aerodynamic and aeroacoustic simulations for airbus helicopters’ compound helicopter RACER. in American Helicopter Society Technical Conference on Aeromechanics Design for Transformative Vertical Flight (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Öhrle, U. Schäferlein, M. Keßler, E. Krämer, Higher-order simulations of a compound helicopter using adaptive mesh refinement. in American Helicopter Society 74th Annual Forum (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. O’Meara, T.J. Mueller, Laminar separation bubble characteristics on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA J. 25(8), 1033–1041 (1987). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Raddatz, J.K. Fassbender, Block Structured Navier-Stokes Solver FLOWer. (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2005), pp. 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32382-1_2

  20. O. Rand, V. Khromov, Compound helicopter: insight and optimization. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 60(1), 1–12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.60.012001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Stanger, B. Kutz, U. Kowarsch, E.R. Busch, M. Keßler, E. Krämer, Enhancement and Applications of a Structural URANS Solver. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland 2015), pp. 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10810-0_29

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.R. Visbal, D.J. Garmann, Analysis of dynamic stall on a pitching airfoil using high-fidelity large-eddy simulations. AIAA J. 56(1), 46–63 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Weihing, Transport Equation based Transition Modeling in FLOWer (University of Stuttgart, User guide. Institute of Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Weihing, J. Letzgus, G. Bangga, T. Lutz, E. Krämer, Hybrid RANS/LES capabilities of the flow solver FLOWer—application to flow around wind turbines. in 6th Symposium on Hybrid RANS-LES Methods (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Yeo, W. Johnson, Optimum design of a compound helicopter. in American Helicopter Society International Meeting on Advanced Rotorcraft Technology and Lift Saving Activities (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The provided supercomputing time and technical support of the High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart (HLRS) of the University of Stuttgart within the HELISIM project is gratefully acknowledged. Parts of the research presented in this study were performed in cooperation of the Institute of Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics of the University of Stuttgart and the Airbus Helicopters division of Airbus SE within the European research framework Clean Sky 2 under Grant 686530. We would like to express our thanks to the European Union for providing us the resources to realize this project. The authors would like to thank Airbus Helicopters Germany and France for the esteemed cooperation within this project and beyond. Furthermore, the investigation is based on the long-standing cooperation with the German Aerospace Center (DLR) making us their CFD code FLOWer available for advancements and research purpose, which we would like to thank for.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Frey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Frey, F., Herb, J., Letzgus, J., Weihing, P., Keßler, M., Krämer, E. (2019). Enhancement and Application of the Flow Solver FLOWer. In: Nagel, W., Kröner, D., Resch, M. (eds) High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ' 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13325-2_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics