Abstract
This paper aims to understand the representativeness of online public opinion and the influence of online public-issue discussions on mass opinion. By analyzing three survey datasets from Taiwan, the findings show that online civic participants are not representative of the general population; moreover, online discussions of public issues do not directly affect general public opinion. According to these findings, this paper recommends that online public opinions are used with caution as they are not necessarily representative of general public opinion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
There are several examples that illustrate this; for instance, in June 2018, the Taiwanese government made “a big U turn regarding its childcare policy” due to a citizen proposal being endorsed by “thousands of netizens” (https://www.thenewslens.com/article/98742, visited on 2018/7/12). In addition, in 2016, “four thousand people left angry messages on Hualien County governor Shih’s Facebook homepage”; this resulted in the governor changing his previous decision to calling off school and work in Hualien due to the typhoon (http://www.peoplenews.tw/news/2dbd589c-2958-450e-a1b4-0964c42ad959, visited 2018/7/12).
References
Beauchamp, N.: Predicting and interpolating state-level polls using Twitter textual data. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 61(2), 490–503 (2017)
Bermingham, A., Smeaton, A.: On using Twitter to monitor political sentiment and predict election results. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment Analysis where AI meets Psychology (SAAIP 2011) (2011)
Ceron, A., Curini, L., Iacus, S.M., Porro, G.: Every tweet counts? How sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens’ political preferences with an application to Italy and France. New Media Soc. 16(2), 340–358 (2014)
Ceron, A., Curini, L., Iacus, S.M.: Using sentiment analysis to monitor electoral campaigns: method matters—evidence from the United States and Italy. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 33(1), 3–20 (2015)
Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M.R., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM 133, 89–96 (2011)
DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., Rojas, F.: More tweets, more votes: social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. PLoS One 8(11), e79449 (2013)
Gayo-Avello, D.: Don’t turn social media into another ‘Literary Digest’ poll. Commun. ACM 54(10), 121–128 (2011)
Gayo-Avello, D.: A meta-analysis of state-of-the-art electoral prediction from Twitter data. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 31(6), 649–679 (2013)
Mislove, A., Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y.-Y., Onnela, J.-P., Rosenquist, J.N.: Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. In: ICWSM 2011, no. 5, p. 25 (2011)
O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B.R., Smith, N.A.: From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. ICWSM 11(122–129), 1–2 (2010)
Prichard, J., Watters, P., Krone, T., Spiranovic, C., Cockburn, H.: Social media sentiment analysis: a new empirical tool for assessing public opinion on crime. Curr. Issues Crim. Just. 27, 217 (2015)
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T.O., Sandner, P.G., Welpe, I.M.: Election forecasts with Twitter: how 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 29(4), 402–418 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lee, C. (2019). Challenges of E-Participation: Can the Opinions of Netizens Represent and Affect Mass Opinions?. In: Chugunov, A., Misnikov, Y., Roshchin, E., Trutnev, D. (eds) Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 947. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13283-5_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13283-5_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13282-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13283-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)