Constitutive Modelling of Wound Healing

  • Adrian Buganza TepoleEmail author
Part of the Studies in Mechanobiology, Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials book series (SMTEB, volume 22)


Wound healing is a complex process spanning several temporal and spatial scales and requiring precise coordination of cell populations through mechanical and biochemical regulatory networks. The dermis, which is the load bearing layer of the skin, is rebuilt after injury by fibroblasts through collagen deposition and active contraction. Fibroblast activity is controlled by cytokine gradients established during the initial inflammatory response, as well as by mechanical cues. However, even though we know the individual components of the wound healing system, in particular the factors associated with fibroblast-driven remodeling, we are still unable to achieve perfect skin regeneration and, instead, wounds lead to scars with inferior mechanical properties compared to healthy skin. Computational models offer the unique ability to quantitatively analyze the dynamics of wound healing in order to attain a deeper understanding of this system. Here we show a continuum framework to describe the essential bio-chemo-mechanical couplings during wound healing, together with a finite element implementation of a model problem. We account for nonlinear mechanical behavior and anisotropy of skin through a microstructure-based strain energy function, as well as the split of the deformation gradient into elastic and permanent deformations. These microstructure features evolve in time according to the spatiotemporal evolution of cell and cytokine concentration fields, which obey reaction diffusion differential equations. The model problem exhibits emergent features of wound healing dynamics, such as wound contraction by fibroblasts in the periphery of the injury. Moreover, the proposed framework can be readily extended to more comprehensive regulatory networks and used to simulate other realistic geometries. Thus, we expect that the formulation presented here will enable further advances in wound healing research.


  1. 1.
    Aarabi S, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC (2007) Hypertrophic scar formation following burns and trauma: new approaches to treatment. PLoS Med 4:1464–1470Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Zuijlen PPM, Ruurda JJB, Van Veen HA, Van Marle J, Van Trier AJM, Groenevelt F et al (2003) Collagen morphology in human skin and scar tissue: no adaptations in response to mechanical loading at joints. Burns 29:423–431Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corr DT, Gallant-Behm CL, Shrive NG, Hart DA (2009) Biomechanical behavior of scar tissue and uninjured skin in a porcine model. Wound Repair Regen 17:250–259Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singer AJ, Clark RA (1999) Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med 341(10):738–746Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eming SA, Krieg T, Davidson JM (2007) Inflammation in wound repair: molecular and cellular mechanisms. J Invest Dermatol 127:514–525Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van der Veer WM, Bloemen MCT, Ulrich MMW, Molema G, van Zuijlen PP, Middelkoop E et al (2009) Potential cellular and molecular causes of hypertrophic scar formation. Burns 35:15–29Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, Kirsner R, Lambert L, Hunt TK et al (2009) Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen 17:763–771Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walmsley GG, Maan ZN, Wong VW, Duscher D, Hu MS, Zielins ER et al (2015) Scarless wound healing: chasing the holy grail. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:907–917Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larson BJ, Longaker MT, Lorenz HP (2010) Scarless fetal wound healing: a basic science review. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1172–1180Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Colwell AS, Longaker MT (2003) Fetal wound healing. Front Biosci 8:s1240–s1248Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martino MM, Tortelli F, Mochizuki M, Traub S, Ben-David D, Kuhn GA et al (2011) Engineering the growth factor microenvironment with fibronectin domains to promote wound and bone tissue healing. Sci Transl Med 3:100ra89Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chantre CO, Campbell PH, Golecki HM, Buganza AT, Capulli AK, Deravi LF et al (2018) Production-scale fibronectin nanofibers promote wound closure and tissue repair in a dermal mouse model. Biomaterials 166:96–108Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vodovotz Y, Csete M, Bartels J, Chang S, An G (2008) Translational systems biology of inflammation. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000014Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McGrath JA, Eady RAJ, Pope FM (2004) Anatomy and organization of human skin. In: Burns T, Breathnach S, Cox N, Griffiths C (eds) Rook’s textbook of dermatology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 45–128Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ní Annaidh A, Bruyère K, Destrade M, Gilchrist MD, Maurini C, Otténio M et al (2012) Automated estimation of collagen fibre dispersion in the dermis and its contribution to the anisotropic behaviour of skin. Ann Biomed Eng 40:1666–1678Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Driskell RR, Lichtenberger BM, Hoste E, Kretzschmar K, Simons BD, Charalambous M et al (2013) Distinct fibroblast lineages determine dermal architecture in skin development and repair. Nature 504:277–281Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moreno-Arotzena O, Meier J, del Amo C, García-Aznar J (2015) Characterization of fibrin and collagen gels for engineering wound healing models. Materials (Basel) 8:1636–1651Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van De Water L, Varney S, Tomasek JJ (2013) Mechanoregulation of the myofibroblast in wound contraction, scarring, and fibrosis: opportunities for new therapeutic intervention. Adv Wound Care 2:122–141Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hinz B (2010) The myofibroblast: paradigm for a mechanically active cell. J Biomech 43:146Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sherratt JA, Murray JD (1990) Models of epidermal wound healing. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 241:29–36Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tranquillo RT, Murray JD (1992) Continuum model of fibroblast-driven wound contraction: inflammation-mediation. J Theor Biol 158:135–172Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buganza Tepole A, Kuhl E (2014) Computational modeling of chemo-bio-mechanical coupling: a systems-biology approach toward wound healing. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 5842:1–18Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baum CL, Arpey CJ (2005) Normal cutaneous wound healing: clinical correlation with cellular and molecular events. Dermatol Surg 31:674–686Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Breuing K, Andree C, Helo G, Slama J, Liu PY, Eriksson E (1997) Growth factors in the repair of partial thickness porcine skin wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:657–664Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim M-H, Liu W, Borjesson DL, Curry F-RE, Miller LS, Cheung AL et al (2008) Dynamics of neutrophil infiltration during cutaneous wound healing and infection using fluorescence imaging. J Invest Dermatol 128:1812–1820Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Steenfos HH (1994) Growth factors and wound healing. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 28(2):95–105Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tsirogianni AK, Moutsopoulos NM, Moutsopoulos HM (2006) Wound healing: immunological aspects. Injury 37:S5–S12Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cooper L, Johnson C, Burslem F, Martin P (2005) Wound healing and inflammation genes revealed by array analysis of “macrophageless” PU.1 null mice. Genome Biol 6:R5Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT (2008) Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453:314–321Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pastar I, Stojadinovic O, Yin NC, Ramirez H, Nusbaum AG, Sawaya A et al (2014) Epithelialization in wound healing: a comprehensive review. Adv Wound Care 3:445–464Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chaplain MAJ (2000) Mathematical modelling of angiogenesis. J Neurooncol 50(1):37–51Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schmidt BA, Horsley V (2013) Intradermal adipocytes mediate fibroblast recruitment during skin wound healing. Development 140:1517–1527Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Verhaegen PDHM, van Zuijlen PPM, Pennings NM, van Marle J, Niessen FB, van der Horst CMAM et al (2009) Differences in collagen architecture between keloid, hypertrophic scar, normotrophic scar, and normal skin: an objective histopathological analysis. Wound Repair Regen 17:649–656Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Greenhalgh DG (1998) The role of apoptosis in wound healing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 30:1019–1030Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Doillon CJ, Dunn MG, Bender E, Silver FH (1985) Collagen fiber formation in repair tissue: development of strength and toughness. Coll Relat Res 5:481–492Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nagaraja S, Wallqvist A, Reifman J, Mitrophanov AY (2014) Computational approach to characterize causative factors and molecular indicators of chronic wound inflammation. J Immunol 192:1824–1834Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vodovotz Y, Clermont G, Chow C, An G (2004) Mathematical models of the acute inflammatory response. Curr Opin Crit Care 10:383–390Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Buganza Tepole A, Kuhl E (2013) Systems-based approaches toward wound healing. Pediatr Res 73:553–563Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bindschadler M, McGrath JL (2007) Sheet migration by wounded monolayers as an emergent property of single-cell dynamics. J Cell Sci 120:876–884Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhao J, Cao Y, DiPietro LA, Liang J (2017) Dynamic cellular finite-element method for modelling large-scale cell migration and proliferation under the control of mechanical and biochemical cues: a study of re-epithelialization. J R Soc Interface 14:20160959Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Daub JT, Merks RMH (2013) A cell-based model of extracellular-matrix-guided endothelial cell migration during angiogenesis. Bull Math Biol 75:1377–1399MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stokes CL, Lauffenburger DA (1991) Analysis of the roles of microvessel endothelial cell random motility and chemotaxis in angiogenesis. J Theor Biol 152:377–403Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    McDougall S, Dallon J, Sherratt J, Maini P (2006) Fibroblast migration and collagen deposition during dermal wound healing: mathematical modelling and clinical implications. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 364:1385–1405MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dallon JC, Sherratt JA, Maini PK (1999) Mathematical modelling of extracellular matrix dynamics using discrete cells: fiber orientation and tissue regeneration. J Theor Biol 199:449Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cumming BD, McElwain DLS, Upton Z (2009) A mathematical model of wound healing and subsequent scarring. J R Soc Interface 7:19–34Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rouillard AD, Holmes JW (2014) Coupled agent-based and finite-element models for predicting scar structure following myocardial infarction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 115:235–243Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Safferling K, Sütterlin T, Westphal K, Ernst C, Breuhahn K, James M et al (2013) Wound healing revised: a novel reepithelialization mechanism revealed by in vitro and in silico models. J Cell Biol 203:691–709Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Das A, Lauffenburger D, Asada H, Kamm RD (2010) A hybrid continuum-discrete modelling approach to predict and control angiogenesis: analysis of combinatorial growth factor and matrix effects on vessel-sprouting morphology. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 368:2937–2960MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shirinifard A, Gens JS, Zaitlen BL, Popławski NJ, Swat M, Glazier JA (2009) 3D multi-cell simulation of tumor growth and angiogenesis. PLoS One 4:e7190Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Milde F, Bergdorf M (2008) A hybrid model for three-dimensional simulations of sprouting angiogenesis. Biophys J 95:3146–3160Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Maini PK, McElwain DLS (2004) Traveling wave model to interpret a wound-healing cell migration assay for human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Tissue Eng 10:475–482Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Levine HA, Sleeman BD (2001) Mathematical modeling of the onset of capillary formation initiating angiogenesis. J Math 42:195–238MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pettet GJ, Byrne HM, McElwain DLS, Norbury J (1996) A model of wound-healing angiogenesis in soft tissue. Math Biosci 136:35–63zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gaffney EA, Pugh K, Maini PK, Arnold F (2002) Investigating a simple model of cutaneous wound healing angiogenesis. J Math Biol 45:337–374MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Byrne HM, Chaplain MAJ, Evans DL, Hopkinson I (2000) Mathematical modelling of angiogenesis in wound healing: comparison of theory and experiment. J Theor Med 2:175–197zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schugart RC, Friedman A, Zhao R, Sen CK (2008) Wound angiogenesis as a function of tissue oxygen tension: a mathematical model. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:2628–2633Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Olsen L, Sherratt JA (1995) A mechanochemical model for adult dermal wound contraction: on the permanence of the contracted tissue displacement profile. J Theor Biol 10(3):475–482Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Murphy KE, McCue SW, McElwain DLS (2012) Clinical strategies for the alleviation of contractures from a predictive mathematical model of dermal repair. Wound Repair Regen 20:194–202Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Haugh JM (2006) Deterministic model of dermal wound invasion incorporating receptor-mediated signal transduction and spatial gradient sensing. Biophys J 90(7):2297–2308Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Javierre E, Vermolen FJ, Vuik C, Zwaag S (2008) A mathematical analysis of physiological and morphological aspects of wound closure. J Math Biol 59:605–630MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Valero C, Javierre E, García-Aznar JM, Gómez-Benito MJ (2013) Numerical modelling of the angiogenesis process in wound contraction. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 12:349–360Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Vermolen FJ, Javierre E (2010) Computer simulations from a finite-element model for wound contraction and closure. J Tissue Viability 19:43–53Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Buganza Tepole A (2017) Computational systems mechanobiology of wound healing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 314:46–70MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Swat MH, Thomas GL, Belmonte JM, Shirinifard A, Hmeljak D, Glazier JA (2012) Multi-scale modeling of tissues using CompuCell3D. Methods Cell Biol 110:325–366Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Merks RMH, Glazier JA (2005) A cell-centered approach to developmental biology. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 352:113–130Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ziraldo C, Solovyev A, Allegretti A, Krishnan S, Henzel MK, Sowa GA et al (2015) A computational, tissue-realistic model of pressure ulcer formation in individuals with spinal cord injury. PLoS Comput Biol 11:e1004309Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Checa S, Rausch MK, Petersen A, Kuhl E, Duda GN (2015) The emergence of extracellular matrix mechanics and cell traction forces as important regulators of cellular self-organization. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 14:1–13Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tepole AB, Kabaria H, Bletzinger K-U, Kuhl E (2015) Isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shell formulations for biological membranes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 293:328–347MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Abhilash AS, Baker BM, Trappmann B, Chen CS, Shenoy VB (2014) Remodeling of fibrous extracellular matrices by contractile cells: predictions from discrete fiber network simulations. Biophys J 107:1829–1840Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Obbink-Huizer C, Oomens CWJ, Loerakker S, Foolen J, Bouten CVC, Baaijens FPT (2014) Computational model predicts cell orientation in response to a range of mechanical stimuli. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 13:227–234Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Xue C, Friedman A, Sen CK (2009) A mathematical model of ischemic cutaneous wounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:16537–16538Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wong VW, Akaishi S, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC (2011) Pushing back: wound mechanotransduction in repair and regeneration. J Invest Dermatol 131:2186–2196Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Schreml S, Szeimies R-M, Prantl L, Landthaler M, Babilas P (2010) Wound healing in the 21st century. J Am Acad Dermatol 63:866–881Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast 61:1–48MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA (2006) Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface 3:15–35Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Tonge TK, Voo LM, Nguyen TD (2013) Full-field bulge test for planar anisotropic tissues: Part II-A thin shell method for determining material parameters and comparison of two distributed fiber modeling approaches. Acta Biomater 9:5926–5942Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Li W, Luo XY (2016) An invariant-based damage model for human and animal skins. Ann Biomed Eng 44:3109–3122Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Limbert G (2017) Mathematical and computational modelling of skin biophysics: a review. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 473:20170257MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Cortes DH, Lake SP, Kadlowec JA, Soslowsky LJ, Elliott DM (2010) Characterizing the mechanical contribution of fiber angular distribution in connective tissue: comparison of two modeling approaches. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:651–658Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Ronen M, Rosenberg R, Shraiman BI, Alon U (2002) Assigning numbers to the arrows: parameterizing a gene regulation network by using accurate expression kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:10555–10560Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Sherratt JA (1994) Chemotaxis and chemokinesis in eukaryotic cells: the Keller-Segel equations as an approximation to a detailed model. Bull Math Biol 56:129–146zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hu H, Sachs F (1997) Stretch-activated ion channels in the heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 29:1511Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Wang JHC, Thampatty BP, Lin JS, Im HJ (2007) Mechanoregulation of gene expression in fibroblasts. Gene 391:1–15Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Moreo P, García-Aznar JM, Doblaré M (2008) Modeling mechanosensing and its effect on the migration and proliferation of adherent cells. Acta Biomater 4:613–621Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Paterno J, Vial IN, Wong VW, Rustad KC, Sorkin M, Shi Y et al (2010) Akt-mediated mechanotransduction in murine fibroblasts during hypertrophic scar formation. Wound Repair Regen 19:49–58Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Wong VW, Rustad KC, Akaishi S, Sorkin M, Glotzbach JP, Januszyk M et al (2011) Focal adhesion kinase links mechanical force to skin fibrosis via inflammatory signaling. Nat Med 18:1–6Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Jiang C, Shao L, Wang Q, Dong Y (2012) Repetitive mechanical stretching modulates transforming growth factor-β induced collagen synthesis and apoptosis in human patellar tendon fibroblasts. Biochem Cell Biol 90:667–674Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Powell HM, McFarland KL, Butler DL, Supp DM, Boyce ST (2010) Uniaxial strain regulates morphogenesis, gene expression, and tissue strength in engineered skin. Tissue Eng Part A 16:1083–1092Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Kobayashi T, Kim H, Liu X, Sugiura H, Kohyama T, Fang Q et al (2014) Matrix metalloproteinase-9 activates TGF-β and stimulates fibroblast contraction of collagen gels. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 306:L1006–L1015Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Brissett AE, Sherris DA (2001) Scar contractures, hypertrophic scars, and keloids. Facial Plast Surg 17:263–271Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Brown BC, McKenna SP, Siddhi K, McGrouther DA, Bayat A (2008) The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life after skin scarring. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:1049–1058Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Rodriguez EK, Hoger A, McCulloch AD (1994) Stress-dependent finite growth in soft elastic tissues. J Biomech 27:455–467Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Zöllner AM, Buganza Tepole A, Kuhl E (2012) On the biomechanics and mechanobiology of growing skin. J Theor Biol 297:166–175MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Menzel A, Kuhl E (2012) Frontiers in growth and remodeling. Mech Res Commun 42:1–14Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Ateshian GA, Humphrey JD (2012) Continuum mixture models of biological growth and remodeling: past successes and future opportunities. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 14:97Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ateshian GA (2007) On the theory of reactive mixtures for modeling biological growth. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 6:423–445Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Models M, Humphrey JD, Rajagopal KR (2002) A constrained mixture model for growth and remodeling of soft tissues. Math Model Meth Appl Sci 12:407–430MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Valero C, Javierre E, García-Aznar JM, Menzel A, Gómez-Benito MJ (2014) Challenges in the modeling of wound healing mechanisms in soft biological tissues. Ann Biomed Eng 43(7):1654–1665Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Pensalfini M, Haertel E, Hopf R, Wietecha M, Werner S, Mazza E (2017) The mechanical fingerprint of murine excisional wounds. Acta Biomater 65:226–236Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Berard CW, Woodward SC, Herrmann JB, Pulaski EJ (1964) Healing of incisional wounds in rats the relationship of tensile strength and morphology to the normal skin wrinkle lines. Ann Surg 159:260–270Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Chaudhry HR, Bukiet B, Siegel M, Findley T, Ritter AB, Guzelsu N (1998) Optimal patterns for suturing wounds. J Biomech 31:653–662Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Wong VW, Levi K, Akaishi S, Schultz G, Dauskardt RH (2012) Scar zones: region-specific differences in skin tension may determine incisional scar formation. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1272Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Gurtner GC, Dauskardt RH, Wong VW, Bhatt KA, Wu K, Vial IN et al (2011) Improving cutaneous scar formation by controlling the mechanical environment: large animal and phase I studies. Ann Surg 254:217–225Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Aarabi S, Bhatt KA, Shi Y, Paterno J, Chang EI, Loh SA et al (2007) Mechanical load initiates hypertrophic scar formation through decreased cellular apoptosis. FASEB J 21:3250–3261Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Tranquillo RT, Murray JD (1992) Continuum model of fibroblast-driven wound contraction: inflammation-mediation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 158:361–371Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Kuhl E, Garikipati K, Arruda EM, Grosh K (2005) Remodeling of biological tissue: mechanically induced reorientation of a transversely isotropic chain network. J Mech Phys Solids 53:1552–1573MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Wu M, Ben Amar M (2014) Growth and remodelling for profound circular wounds in skin. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 14:1–14Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Richardson W, Holmes J (2016) Emergence of collagen orientation heterogeneity in healing infarcts and an agent-based model. Biophys J 110:2266–2277Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical Engineering and Weldon School of Biomedical EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations