Skip to main content

Concept Design: Modeling and Synthesis from Requirements to Functional Models and Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Automation of Cyber-Physical Systems

Abstract

Cyber physical systems (CPS) design has become more challenging due to the tight integration of the cyber and physical worlds and the use of cross-domain engineering practices. Moreover, competition in the market in terms of quality, innovation, cost, and time-to-market makes CPS design even harder for the engineers. These challenges advocate for the adoption of integrated engineering methods and tools by CPS design engineers. In addition, state-of-the-art engineering tools are very domain specific, making it difficult to integrate different tools for system-level analysis. This chapter discusses a novel multi-disciplinary systems engineering methodology and related design automation techniques for a complex CPS presented in Wan et al. (IEEE Syst J 11(4):2028–2039, 2017). Instead of domain-specific architecture/simulation models, this method directly targets the early design stage at the functional level. It enables the coupling of systems engineering principles with high-level synthesis techniques from the field of design automation. This blend results in a functional modeling synthesis tool capable of generating high-fidelity simulation models for the design space exploration and validation of multiple cyber-physical architectures. Using real-world automotive use-cases, it is demonstrated how functional models capturing integrated cyber-physical requirements are synthesized into high-fidelity multi-domain simulation models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abelein, U., Lochner, H., Hahn, D., & Straube, S. (2012, March). Complexity, quality and robustness-the challenges of tomorrow’s automotive electronics. In Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), 2012 (pp. 870–871). Piscataway: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al Faruque, M., Regazzoni, F., & Pajic, M. (2015, October). Design methodologies for securing cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (pp. 30–36). New York: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alvarez Cabrera, A. A., Erden, M. S., & Tomiyama, T. (2009). On the potential of function-behavior-state (FBS) methodology for the integration of modeling tools. In Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Design Conference Competitive Design. Bedford: Cranfield University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ANSYS Tool Kits for Automotive Solutions. http://www.ansys.com/Industries/Automotive/

  5. AUTOSAR Automotive Open System Architecture. https://www.autosar.org/

  6. Bassi, L., Secchi, C., Bonfe, M., & Fantuzzi, C. (2011). A SysML-based methodology for manufacturing machinery modeling and design. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 16(6), 1049–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boucher, M., & Houlihan, D. (2008). System design: New product development for mechatronics. Boston: Aberdeen Group.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Broy, M., Gleirscher, M., Kluge, P., Krenzer, W., Merenda, S., & Wild, D. (2009). Automotive architecture framework: Towards a holistic and standardised system architecture description. White paper. IBM Corporation. Technical Report, Technische Universitt Mnchen. TUM-I0915.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Broy, M., Kruger, I. H., Pretschner, A., & Salzmann, C. (2007). Engineering automotive software. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(2), 356–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bryant, C. R., Stone, R. B., McAdams, D. A., Kurtoglu, T., & Campbell, M. I. (2005). Concept generation from the functional basis of design. In ICED 05: 15th International Conference on Engineering Design: Engineering Design and the Global Economy (p. 1702). Barton: Engineers Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Canedo, A., Schwarzenbach, E., & Al Faruque, M. A. (2013, April). Context-sensitive synthesis of executable functional models of cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 4th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (pp. 99–108). New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Canedo, A., Wan, J., & Al Faruque, M. A. (2014, November). Functional modeling compiler for system-level design of automotive cyber-physical systems. In 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), (pp. 39–46). Piscataway: IEEE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Charette, R. N. (2009). This car runs on code. IEEE Spectrum, 46(3), 3.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Christen, E., & Bakalar, K. (1999). VHDL-AMS-a hardware description language for analog and mixed-signal applications. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, 46(10), 1263–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooprider, A. (2014). Automotive embedded systems tutorial-part I. In Proceedings of the 51th Design Automation Conference, DAC (Vol. 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dahmus, J. B., Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P., & Otto, K. N. (2001). Modular product architecture. Design Studies, 22(5), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Derler, P., Lee, E. A., & Vincentelli, A. S. (2012). Modeling cyberphysical systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(1), 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Erden, M. S., Komoto, H., van Beek, T. J., D’Amelio, V., Echavarria, E., & Tomiyama, T. (2008). A review of function modeling: Approaches and applications. Ai Edam, 22(2), 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fortney, G. (2014, August). Model based systems engineering using validated executable specifications as an enabler for cost and risk reduction. In Proceedings of the 2014 Ground Vehicle Systems Engineering and Technology Symposium (GVSETS).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Helms, B., & Shea, K. (2012). Computational synthesis of product architectures based on object-oriented graph grammars. Journal of Mechanical Design, 134(2), 021008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hirtz, J., Stone, R. B., McAdams, D. A., Szykman, S., & Wood, K. L. (2002). A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Research in Engineering Design, 13(2), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Komoto, H., & Tomiyama, T. (2012). A framework for computer-aided conceptual design and its application to system architecting of mechatronics products. Computer-Aided Design, 44(10), 931–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kruse, B., Mnzer, C., Wlkl, S., Canedo, A., & Shea, K. (2012, August). A model-based functional modeling and library approach for mechatronic systems in SysML. In ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 1217–1227). New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kurtoglu, T., & Campbell, M. I. (2009). Automated synthesis of electromechanical design configurations from empirical analysis of function to form mapping. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(1), 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. LabVIEW System Design Software. http://www.ni.com/labview/

  26. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - Modelica Buildings Library. http://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/modelica

  27. Lee, E. A. (2008, May). Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. In 11th IEEE Symposium on Object Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC) (pp. 363–369). Piscataway: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  28. LMS Imagine.Lab AMESim. http://www.lmsintl.com/

  29. McFarland, M. C., Parker, A. C., & Camposano, R. (1990). The high-level synthesis of digital systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 78(2), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mellor, S. J., Balcer, M., & Foreword By-Jacoboson, I. (2002). Executable UML: A foundation for model-driven architectures. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Modelica Association, Modelica Standard Library. https://modelica.org/libraries/Modelica/

  32. Modelon - Vehicle Dynamics Library. http://www.modelon.com/

  33. OMG Systems Modeling Language (SysML). http://www.omgsysml.org/

  34. Oregon State University, Design Engineering Lab, Design Repository. http://designengineeringlab.org/

  35. Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (2013). Engineering design: A systematic approach. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rudov-Clark, S. D., & Stecki, J. (2009, March). The language of FMEA: On the effective use and reuse of FMEA data. In Sixth DSTO International Conference on Health & Usage Monitoring (pp. 9–12).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A., Damm, W., & Passerone, R. (2012). Taming Dr. Frankenstein: Contract-based design for cyber-physical systems. European Journal of Control, 18(3), 217–238.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Simscape. http://www.mathworks.com/products/simscape/

  39. Simulink. http://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink/

  40. Stone, R. B., & Wood, K. L. (2000). Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(4), 359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Uckun, S. (2011). Meta II: Formal co-verification of correctness of large-scale cyber-physical systems during design. Palo Alto Research Center, Technical Report, 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vincentelli, A. S. (2002). Defining platform-based design. EEDesign of EETimes.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wan, J., Canedo, A., & Al Faruque, M. A. (2015, September). Security-aware functional modeling of cyber-physical systems. In 2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA) (pp. 1–4). Piscataway: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wan, J., Canedo, A., & Al Faruque, M. A. (2017). Cyberphysical codesign at the functional level for multidomain automotive systems. IEEE Systems Journal, 11(4), 2949–2959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wan, J., Canedo, A., & Al Faruque, M. A. (2017). Functional model-based design methodology for automotive cyber-physical systems. IEEE Systems Journal, 11(4), 2028–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wolkl, S., & Shea, K. (2009, January). A computational product model for conceptual design using SysML. In ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 635–645). New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nafiul Rashid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wan, J., Rashid, N., Canedo, A., Faruque, M.A.A. (2019). Concept Design: Modeling and Synthesis from Requirements to Functional Models and Simulation. In: Al Faruque, M., Canedo, A. (eds) Design Automation of Cyber-Physical Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13050-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13050-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13049-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13050-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics