Abstract
This chapter offers a contribution in the analysis of subnational democratic regimes in Colombia. It is recognized as a starting point that the democratization reforms that have been advanced in Colombia from the national level, as is the case of the Political Reform of 2003, do not necessarily guarantee that the democratic regime is homogeneous within the country, there being particularities specific to certain regions and territories. An empirical study of the behavior of local democracies in the Colombian Pacific region during the 2004–2014 decade as a means of characterizing and determining certain patterns which the evolution of their local political regimes has followed is proposed. In the Colombian Pacific, democratic practices and institutions have followed a trajectory in which the subnational political regime has become one in which the parties of third forces or third parties have taken control of the mayoralties and municipal councils from the traditional political parties. It is possible to observe that the competition among the third parties has been atomized. Besides that, they have designed and executed predatory public policy agendas, causing the sustained deterioration of the quality of the public policy provided by the city halls. Based on the documentary work offered by Cendales et al. (2019a), it can be established, as historical initial conditions in the analysis, that third parties are political organizations considered to have a low valuation for the public provision of goods and a high rate of fiscal voracity. Given the initial conditions that can be established from the narrative, and based on the model of public choice with clientelism and corruption proposed by Cendales et al. (2019b), the theoretical proposal that is to be tested is as follows: If the political power of the third parties over the mayoralties and municipal councils increases, then the quality of the public policy will decrease. The transmission mechanism is offered by Cendales et al. (2019b).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bejarano, A. M. (2011). Precarious democracies: Understanding regime stability and change in Colombia and Venezuela. ND Kellogg Inst Int’l Studies: University of Notre Dame Press.
Cameron, S., & Heckman, J. (1998). Life cycle schooling and dynamic selection bias: Models and evidence for five cohorts of American males. The Journal of Political Economy, 106, 262–333.
Cendales, A., Garza, N., & Arroyo, S. (2019a). A model of public choice with clientelism and corruption: Introducing the analytical. In: A. Cendales, J. J. Mora, H. Guerrero, & A. Pinto (Eds.), Analytical narrative on subnational democracies in Colombia. Clientelism, government and public policy in the Pacific region. Mimeo.
Cendales, A., Olaya, J., & Duncan, G. (2019b). Narrative on local democracies, government and public policy in the Colombian Pacific. In: A. Cendales, J. J. Mora, H. Guerrero, & A. Pinto (Eds), Analytical narrative on subnational democracies in Colombia. Clientelism, government and public policy in the Pacific region. Mimeo.
Chevalier, A., & Lanot, G. (2002). The relative effect of family characteristics and financial situation on educational achievement. Education Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, 10(2), 165–181.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Duncan, G., & Guerra, W. (2006). La economía política de La Guajira y el proyecto de infraestructura de agua potable, enero de 2006. Bogotá: Banco Mundial.
Garay, L., & Salcedo-Albarán, E. (2012). Narcotráfico, corrupción y Estados. Cómo las redes ilícitas han reconfigurado las instituciones en Colombia, Guatemala y México. Editorial Debate. Bogotá, Colombia.
Gervasoni, C. (2010). Measuring variance in subnational regimes: Results from an expert-based operationalization of democracy in the argentine provinces. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2(2), 13–52.
Giraudy, A. (2010). The politics of subnational undemocratic regime reproduction in Argentina and Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2(2), 53–84.
González, F. (2014). Configuración regional y violencia: a modo de introducción. In F. González, D. Quiroga, T. Ospina-Posse, A. Aponte, V. Barrera, & E. Porras, Territorio y conflicto en la costa Caribe. Odecofi-Cinep: Bogotá (Colombia).
Greene, W. (2012). Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall.
Levine, D., & Palfrey, T. (2007). The paradox of voter participation? A laboratory study. American Political Science Review, 100(1), 143–158.
Montero, A. (2007). Uneven democracy? Subnational authoritarianism in democratic Brazil. Paper presented at the 2007 Latin American Studies Association meeting.
O’Donnell, G. (2004). Notas sobre la democracia en América Latina. En: PNUD. La democracia en América Latina. Hacia una democracia de ciudadanas y ciudadanos. El debate conceptual sobre la democracia. Buenos Aires: Alfaguara.
Ortiz, V. (2011). El gran elector provincial en Santiago del Estero (2005–2010). Una perspectiva desde adentro de un “oficialismo invencible”. Revista SAAP 5(2), Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1Z16HhU.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cendales, A., Mora, J.J., Arroyo, S. (2019). Political Factions and Public Policy in the Local Democracies of the Colombian Pacific: Empirical Evidence. In: Analytical Narrative on Subnational Democracies in Colombia . SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13009-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13009-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13008-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13009-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)