Advertisement

Assessment of Masonry Structures Based on Analytical Damage Indices

  • Athanasia Skentou
  • Maria G. Douvika
  • Ioannis Argyropoulos
  • Maria Apostolopoulou
  • Antonia Moropoulou
  • Panagiotis G. AsterisEmail author
Conference paper
  • 771 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 961)

Abstract

In this paper, a methodology is presented aiming to predict the vulnerability of masonry structures under seismic action. Masonry structures, among which many are cultural heritage assets, present high vulnerability under earthquake. Reliable simulations of their response under seismic stresses are exceedingly difficult because of the complexity of the structural system and the anisotropic and brittle behavior of the masonry materials. Within this framework, a detailed analytical methodological approach for assessing the seismic vulnerability of historical and monumental masonry structures is presented, taking into account the probabilistic nature of the input parameters by means of analytically determining fragility curves. The emerged methodology is presented in detail following an in depth application on both theoretical basis and existing cultural heritage masonry structures.

Keywords

Damage index Failure criteria Fragility analysis Masonry structures Monuments Restoration mortars Seismic assessment 

References

  1. 1.
    ICOMOS1931. The Athens charter for the restoration of historic monuments. In: Paper Presented at the First International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Athens, Greece (1931). http://www.icomos.org/athens_charter.html
  2. 2.
    ICOMOS1964. The Venice charter for the restoration of historic monuments. In: Paper Presented at the Second International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice, Italy (1964). http://www.international.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.htm
  3. 3.
    Morton, B., Hume, G.L.: The Secretary of the Interior’s standards for historic preservation projects with guidelines for applying the standards, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service (1979)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Syrmakezis, C.A., Asteris, P.G., Sophocleous, A.A.: Earthquake resistant design of masonry tower structures. In: Proceedings, 5th STREMA Conference on Structural Studies, vol. 1, pp. 377–386 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Syrmakezis, C., Sophocleous, A., Asteris, P., Liolios, A.A.: Earthquake resistant design of masonry structural systems. Adv. Earthq. Eng. 2, 717–726 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Syrmakezis, C.A., Chronopoulos, M.P., Sophocleous, A.A., Asteris, P.G.: Structural analysis methodology for historical buildings. Architectural Stud. Mater. Anal. 1, 373–382 (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Binda, L., Saisi, A., Tiraboschi, C.: Investigation procedures for the diagnosis of historic masonries. Constr. Build. Mater. 14(4), 199–233 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lourenço, P.B.: Recommendations for restoration of ancient buildings and the survival of a masonry chimney. Constr. Build. Mater. 20(4), 239–251 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Asteris, P.G.: On the structural analysis and seismic protection of historical masonry structures. Open Constr. Build. Technol. J. 2(1), 124–133 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Onaka, T.: A study of the documentation process for conservation of architectural heritage sites: illustrated by examples from Egypt and Belgium. In: 22nd CIPA Symposium, 11–15 October 2009, Kyoto, Japan (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tassios, T.P.: Seismic engineering of monuments. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 8(6), 1231–1265 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chronopoulos, P.M., Zigouris, N., Asteris, P.G.: Investigation/documentation and aspects of seismic assesment and redesign of traditional masonry buildings in Greece. In: 5th European Conference on Structural Control (EACS 2012), Genoa, Italy, 18–20 June 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Asteris, P.G., Tzamtzis, A.D., Vouthouni, P.P., Sophianopoulos, D.S.: Earthquake resistant design and rehabilitation of masonry historical structures. Pract. Periodical Struct. Des. Constr. (ASCE) 10(1), 49–55 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Asteris, P.G., et al.: Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical masonry structural systems. Eng. Struct. 62–63, 118–134 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Asteris, P.G., et al.: Numerical Modeling of Historic Masonry Structures. Handbook of Research on Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Historic Structures (2015). (Asteris, P.G., Plevris, V. eds.)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Asteris, P.G., Douvika, M., Karakitsios, P., Moundoulas, P., Apostolopoulou, M., Moropoulou, A.: A stochastic computational framework for the seismic assessment of monumental masonry structures. In: 5th International Conference on Integrity, Reliability and Failure, Faculty of Engineering, U. Porto (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Apostolopoulou, M., et al.: A methodological approach for the selection of compatible and performable restoration mortars in seismic hazard areas. Constr. Build. Mater. 155, 1–14 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Syrmakezis, C.A., Asteris, P.G.: Masonry failure criterion under biaxial stress state. J. Mater. Civil Eng. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. (ASCE) 13(1), 58–64 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Asteris, P.G.: Unified yield surface for the nonlinear analysis of brittle anisotropic materials. Nonlinear Sci. Lett. A 4(2), 46–56 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kupfer, Η., Hilsdorf, Η.K., Rusch, H.: Behavior of concrete under biaxial stresses. J. Am. Concrete Inst. 66(8) (1969)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park, Y.J., Ang, H., Wen, Y.K.: Damage-limiting a seismic design of buildings. Earthq. Spectra 3(1), 1–26 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    D’Ayala, D.: Assessing the seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings. In: Tesfamariam, S., Goda, K. (eds.) Handbook of Seismic Risk Analysis and Management of Civil Infrastructure Systems. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp. 334–365 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1533/978057098986.3.334
  23. 23.
    FEMA-273. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency (1997)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    CEN. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. EN 1998-3, March 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kircher, C.A., Nasser, A.A., Kutsu, O., Holmes, W.T.: Developing of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation. Earthq. Spectra 13(4), 664–681 (1997)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barron-Corverra, R.: Spectral evaluation of seismic fragility in structures. Ph.D dissertation. Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY (2000)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reinhorn, A.M., Barron-Corverra, R., Ayala, A.G.: Spectral evaluation of seismic fragility of structures. In: Proceedings ICOSSAR 2001, Newport Beach CA, June 2001Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Page, A.W.: The biaxial compressive strength of brick masonry. Proc. Instn. Civ. Engrs. 71(2), 893–906 (1981)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moropoulou, A., Bakolas, A., Anagnostopoulou, S.: Composite materials in ancient structures. Cement Concrete Comp. 27(2), 295–300 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Douvika, M.G.: Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Monumental Masonry Structures, Master thesis, School of Pedagogical & Technological Education, Athens, Greece (2017). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318259801_Seismic_Vulnerability_Assessment_of_Monumental_Masonry_Structures
  31. 31.
    Skentou, A.D.: Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Masonry Structures, Master thesis, School of Pedagogical & Technological Education, Athens, Greece (2018). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324684962_Seismic_Vulnerability_Assessment_of_Masonry_Structures
  32. 32.
    Asteris, P.G., Douvika, M.G., Apostolopoulou, M., Moropoulou, A.: Seismic and restoration assessment of monumental masonry structures. Materials 10(8), 895 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moropoulou, A., et al.: The combination of NDTS for the diagnostic study of historical buildings: the case study of Kaisariani Monastery. In: COMPDYN 2015 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Crete Island, Greece, 25–27 May 2015, pp. 2321–2336 (2015)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Douvika, M.G., Apostolopoulou, M., Moropoulou, A., Asteris, P.G.: Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Monumental Masonry Structures (in greek). In: 17th Panhellenic Concrete Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece, November 2016 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Athanasia Skentou
    • 1
  • Maria G. Douvika
    • 1
  • Ioannis Argyropoulos
    • 1
  • Maria Apostolopoulou
    • 2
  • Antonia Moropoulou
    • 2
  • Panagiotis G. Asteris
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Computational Mechanics Laboratory, School of Pedagogical and Technological EducationHeraklion, AthensGreece
  2. 2.Laboratory of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations