Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary Approaches in Cultural Heritage Documentation: The Case of Rodakis House in Aegina

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Transdisciplinary Multispectral Modeling and Cooperation for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage (TMM_CH 2018)

Abstract

The surveying and documentation of cultural heritage monuments are widely considered to be the very first steps towards their preservation. In practice, these procedures are undertaken with the use of advanced equipment, which yields the capabilities of detailed recording, representation and digitisation, so as to provide easy access to the material gathered and thus ensure its availability for future research. The expected actions and procedures appear to unfold smoothly when the cultural artifact being documented is public, and is presented as a focal point of cultural interest, ascribing to it an active role in the social, cultural and economic development of the place where it is located. On the contrary, the documentation of private monuments exhibits considerable difficulties in obtaining access permissions, gathering archival material, using specialised technical equipment and coordinating actions in the context of research procedures and interdisciplinary approaches.

The vernacular house of Rodakis is a private monument on the island of Aegina. Despite the fact that it was well known during its creator’s lifetime, continued to be a point of attraction and interest for experts and a place of informal education for students, and was officially declared as a monument of cultural heritage, none of the above was able to prevent its destruction, without the required maintenance over time. The changes in its property status established new conditions for the exclusion of experiential visits at the natural monument, which had indeed become dangerous without the necessary restoration works.

The references and studies on the character of Rodakis house as a monument of architectural heritage cover a period of 110 years, during which an extended directory of archival material of various types was compiled. Overall, these elements place the house in a prominent position, but have not yet been assembled in a comprehensive interdisciplinary study. The present paper attempts to outline the conditions and the possibilities for cooperation between different scientific fields, in the interdisciplinary surveying and documentation of private architectural monuments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Philippidis insightfully notices that folk artifacts, in order to be more easily classified as kinds in different research projects, are converted into entities that can be easily collected and studied as subjects of scientific research. The easier they can be isolated and detached for practical reasons, the more prompt is the estimation of their value. Philippidis (1998: 34) [11].

References

  1. Benaki Museum: Modern Greek Architecture Archives (ΑΝΑ_67, D. Pikionis) 1912–1917

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pikionis, D.: Our Vernacular Art and Us. Filiki Etaireia, Odessa (1925)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pikioni, A. (ed.): Pikionis Dimitris: The Architectural Work, 1912–1934, vol. II. Bastas-Plessas Publications, Athens (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benaki Museum: Modern Greek architecture archives (ΑΝΑ_30, Aristotelis Zachos)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Candilis, G.: Bâtir la Vie: Un Architect Témoin de son Temps. Infolio, Paris (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vasiliadis, D.B.: Vernacular architecture of Aegina. Laographia 16, 413–512 (1956–1957)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vasiliadis, D.B.: Vernacular architecture of Aegina. Laographia 17, 197–254 (1957–1958)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michelis, P.A.: Students’ Works A. The Greek House, 3rd edn. NTUA, Athens (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vrieslander, K., Kaimi, J.: Rodakis House in Aegina. Akritas, Athens (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koulikourdi, G., Alexiou, S.: Guide for the history and monuments of Aegina (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Philippidis, D.: Decorative Arts. Melissa Publications, Athens (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Catalogue for Aldo Van Eyck’s Exhibition, National Gallery and Museum Alexander Soutsos, September 17–October 23, 1983, Athens (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  13. FEK 1252/27-09-2001, Β’: Number of Ministerial Decision Ministry of Culture/ΔΙΛΑΠ/Γ/963/46628 (5)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tsomis, J., Frangoulis, T.: Rodakis house in Aegina. Anti 409, 50–51 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nikolai, O. (2007). http://www.eigen-art.com/index.php?article_id=223&clang=1. Accessed 18 Jan 2013

  16. Tritsibidas, J. (2012). https://vimeo.com/34739133. Accessed 01 Apr 2016

  17. Papaioannou, T.: A monument of traditional architecture is falling in Efimerida syntakton, 10 Jan 2016

    Google Scholar 

  18. Seferis, G.: Days Z, 1956–1960. Ikaros Editions, Athens (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ωscillations: Aegina 08–18 of September 2016. https://dura-dundee.org.uk/2016/06/20/oscillations/

  20. Papaioannou, T.: Desecrating Rodakis House in Aegina Island. Efimerida syntakton, 24 April 2017

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ilias, P., Georgiadou, Z.: Digital memory and private cultural heritage: the case of Rodakis house in Aegina Island. In: 2nd Greek Conference for Digitization of Cultural Heritage Proceedings, Volos, pp. 244–255 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Trilling, J.: The Language of Ornament. Thames and Hudson Ltd., London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Politis, N.G.: Laografia. Laografia 1, 3–18 (1909)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Skoog, D., Holler, J., Nieman, T.: Principles of Instrumental Analysis, 6th edn. Harcourt College Publishers, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sansonetti, J., Striova, D., Biondelli, E., Castellucci, M.: Anal. Bio-Anal. Chem. 397(7), 2667–2676 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lavas, G.P.: Issues About Cultural Management. Melissa Publications, Athens (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Eco, U.: Cultural Deposits. Paratiritis, Athens (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  28. UNESCO Web Archives. http://webarchive.unesco.org/20170129000029/. Accessed 02 Oct 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgiadou Zoe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zoe, G., Athina-Georgia, A., Panagiotis, I. (2019). Interdisciplinary Approaches in Cultural Heritage Documentation: The Case of Rodakis House in Aegina. In: Moropoulou, A., Korres, M., Georgopoulos, A., Spyrakos, C., Mouzakis, C. (eds) Transdisciplinary Multispectral Modeling and Cooperation for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage. TMM_CH 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 961. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12957-6_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12957-6_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12956-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12957-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics