Advertisement

Authentic Learning to Better Prepare for Preservation Work

  • Pieter de VriesEmail author
  • Antonia Moropoulou
Conference paper
  • 771 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 961)

Abstract

Cultural heritage preservation has developed from an insular vocation into a field of innovative scientific methodologies characterized by a holistic approach combining a range of scientific fields. Unfortunately, preservation education has not been able to keep pace with all these developments. In this paper authentic learning is analyzed as a possible educational scenario to help improve preservation education to connect to the state of affairs at the preservation workplace. The purpose is to sketch an educational framework based on knowledge and experiences with authentic learning in other engineering fields as a primer for the design and implementation of ‘authentic learning for preservation’. From the analysis it becomes clear that authentic learning can support the selection of valuable unknown experiences and support the design and development of ‘authentic learning for preservation’ experiments to help closing the gap between preservation education and cultural heritage practice. The authentic learning model as presented here clearly supplies a framework to consider in this endeavor. As such the paper can be helpful in the discussion about the usefulness and feasibility of this approach.

Keywords

Preservation education Authentic learning Learning technologies 

References

  1. 1.
    Moropoulou, A., De Vries, P.: On the problems, challenges and prospects for the european higher engineering education arising from the global economic crisis. In: Come, F. (ed.) SEFI@40 Driving Engineering Education to Meet Future Challenges, Brussels, pp. 81–85 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Vries, P., Van den Bogaard, M.: A contemporary educational model for lifelong learning practices. In: Lappalainen, P., Oy, L. (eds.) European Continuing Engineering Education, Conceptualizing the Lessons Learned, Finland, SEFI and TKK Dipoli, pp. 209–218 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cedefop: Skills, Qualifications and Jobs in the EU: the making of the perfect match. Luxembourg: Publications of the European Union (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Homepage ‘The European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018’ Europa EU. https://europa.eu/cultural-heritage/about. Accessed 15 Aug 2018
  5. 5.
    European Initiative no 8: Skills for Heritage: enhancing education and training for the traditional and new professions INNOVATION PILLAR 2018, 10 July 2018. http://www.ecco-eu.org/fileadmin/user_upload/8_Skills_for_heritage_for_NC.pdf
  6. 6.
    Lombardi, M.: Authentic learning for the 21st century: an overview. In: Oblinger, D.G. (ed.) Educause Learning Initiative (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Becker Adams, S., et al.: Horizon Report: 2018 Higher Education Edition, Reading (2018). ISBN 978-0-9906415-8-2Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herrington, J.: Authentic e-learning in higher education: design principles for authentic learning environments and tasks. In: Reeves, T.C., Yamashita, S. (eds.) Proceedings of E-Learn 2006, pp. 3164–3173. AACE, Chesapeake (2006a)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ott, M., Pozzi, F.: Towards a new era for cultural heritage education: discussing the role of ICT. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(4), 1365–1371 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown, J.S., Collins, A., Duguid, P.: Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ. Res. 18(1), 32–42 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herrington, J.: Design principles for authentic learning environments and tasks. In: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (2006b)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jonassen, D., Mayes, T., McAleese, R.: A manifesto for a constructivist approach to uses of technology in higher education. In: Duffy, T.M., Lowyck, J., Jonassen, D.H., Welsh, T.M. (eds.) Designing Environments for Constructive Learning. NATO ASI Series, vol. 105, pp. 231–247. Springer, Heidelberg (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78069-1_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wertsch, J.V.: Vygotsky and the Formation of the Mind. Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siemens, G.: Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Int. J. Instr. Technol. Distance Learn. 2(1), 3–10 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siemens, G.: Knowing Knowledge. Lulu Publishers (2006). www.lulu.com
  16. 16.
    Lytras, M.: Teaching in the knowledge society: an art of passion. Int. J. Teach. Case Stud. 1(1/2) (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtcs.2007.014205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
  2. 2.National Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations