Skip to main content

Conceptualising Violence in Relation to Social Circumstances and Subject Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Epistemology of Violence

Part of the book series: Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice ((CPTRP))

  • 195 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a definition of ideology, positing ideological thought as possessing a specific epistemic structure analogous to violent epistemology. This chapter outlines how the violent epistemology inherent to ideological thought shapes social structures and promotes violent ways of relating with the phenomenal world, ourselves, and others. This includes dominating, controlling, and hierarchical social relationships, the maintenance of ‘in-groups’ and ‘out-groups’, and socially legitimised violence. This chapter also addresses the complex issue of the relationship between structure (social circumstances) and individual agency in the cyclic perpetuation of violence. This involves a discussion of the role that violent epistemology and ‘non-conducive’ circumstances play in the de-formation of subjectivity and the role of subject de-formation in the cyclical perpetuation of non-conducive social circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that this book supports neither a purely constructivist and individualist, nor a purely social constructivist perspective, but rather recognises the contribution that both constructivism (e.g. Piaget) and social constructivism (e.g. Vygostky) make to our understanding of human learning, development, and epistemology.

  2. 2.

    The term ‘non-conducive social circumstances’ is used in this book to mean circumstances that foster the thwarting of self-actualisation and the enactment of violent epistemology.

  3. 3.

    See Horkheimer (1947, pp. 3–57) for a critique of subjectivist and relativist epistemology and its relation to the neutralisation of ideology.

  4. 4.

    This is precisely why purely social constructivist and relativistic epistemologies do not protect against violence (and may even unwittingly support its manifestation).

References

  • Adorno, T. W. (1967). Sociology and Psychology. New Left Review, I, 47, 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W. (1973). Negative Dialectics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W. (2005). Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Bunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality: Studies in Prejudice Series (Vol. 1). New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiyer, A. (2001). Hemispheric Solutions? Neoliberal Crisis, Criminality and “Democracy” in the Americas. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and Economic Development, 30(2–3), 239–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amann, E., & Baer, W. (2002). Neoliberalism and Its Consequences in Brazil. Journal of Latin American Studies, 34(3), 945–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, E. (1973). The Denial of Death. London: Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1977). The End of Internalization: Adorno’s Social Psychology. Telos, 32, 42–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments in Nature and Design. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making Human Beings Human: Bioecological Perspectives on Human Development. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronner, S. E. (2004). Reclaiming the Enlightenment: Toward a Politics of Radical Engagement. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. (2004). The Neoliberal Theory of Society. In A. Saad-Filho & D. Johnston (Eds.), Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader (pp. 50–59). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. (2009). Social Reproduction in Classrooms and Schools. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38, 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, J. (1987). Television Culture. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (2013). Escape from Freedom. New York: Open Road Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilisation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, W. (2006). Capitalist World-Economy, Globalization, and Violence: Implications for Criminology and Social Justice. International Criminal Justice Review, 16(1), 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K. (1939). The Organism: A Holistic Approach to Biology Derived from Pathological Data in Man. New York: American Book Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (2011). Prison Notebooks. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harber, C. (2002). Schooling as Violence: An Exploratory Overview. Educational Review, 54(1), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. L. (2000). The Effects of Globalization and Neoliberalism in Latin America at the Beginning of the Millennium. Journal of Development Studies, 16(1), 139–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2010). Crack Capitalism. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1995). The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1947). Eclipse of Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (2009). Learning to Be a Person in Society: Learning to Be Me. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists… In Their Own Words (pp. 21–32). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan, R. (2009). What “Form” Transforms? A Constructive-Developmental Approach to Transformative Learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists… In Their Own Words (pp. 35–52). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithäuser, T. (1976). Formen des Alltagsbewusstseins. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1964). One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1969). Eros and Civilisation: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. London: Sphere Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConkey, J. (2004). Knowledge and Acknowledgement: ‘Epistemic Injustice’ as a Problem of Recognition. Politics, 24(3), 198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. (2013). The Paradoxical Perpetuation of Neoliberalism: How Ideologies Are Formed and Dissolved. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://www.heathwoodpress.com/the-paradoxical-perpetuation-of-neoliberalism-how-ideologies-are-formed-and-dissolved/.

  • Myrdal, G. (1944). An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary. (2016). Ideology. Retrieved August 21, 2016, from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/ideology?q=ideology.

  • Padesky, C. A., & Greenberger, D. (1995). Clinician’s Guide to Mind Over Mood. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1977). The Development of Thought: Equilibration of Cognitive Structures. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, S. (2013). An Archaeology of Violence: Interdisciplinary Approaches. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1959). A Theory of Therapy, Personality and Interpersonal Relationships as Developed in the Client-Centered Framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science Vol. 3 – Formulations of the Person and the Social Context. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1980). A Way of Being. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross Epp, J. (1996). Schools, Complicity and Sources of Violence. In J. Ross Epp & A. M. Watkinson (Eds.), Systemic Violence: How Schools Hurt Children (pp. 1–24). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. P. (1944). Anti-Semite and Jew. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. P. (1956). Being and Nothingness: An Essay in Phenomenological Ontology. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. P. (1963). Preface. In F. Fanon (Ed.), The Wretched of the Earth (pp. 7–34). New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheff, T. J., & Retzinger, S. M. (2001). Emotions and Violence: Shame and Rage in Destructive Conflicts. Indianapolis: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, D. (2007). Sartre and Adorno: The Dialectics of Subjectivity. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Domination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. C. (2011). Consciousness and Revolt: An Exploration Toward Reconciliation. Holt: Heathwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. C. (2016). Society, Social Pathology and the (De)formation of the Subject: Toward a Radical Philosophy of Psychology (Part 1). Retrieved February 15, 2016, from http://www.heathwoodpress.com/r-c-smith-society-social-pathology-and-the-deformation-of-the-subject-toward-a-radical-philosophy-of-psychology-part-1/.

  • Young, R. J. C. (2001). Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuidervaart, L. (2007). Social Philosophy After Adorno. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Titchiner, B.M. (2019). Conceptualising Violence in Relation to Social Circumstances and Subject Development. In: The Epistemology of Violence. Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12911-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics