Skip to main content

Mathematical or Computational Thinking? An Early Years Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Mathematical Learning and Cognition in Early Childhood

Abstract

Many young children begin school already as significant users of technology. Increasingly, there has been a demand for engaging all school-age children to engage in computational thinking (CT) so that their ability to also be producers of technology in the future is enhanced. CT includes cognitive processes and practices that are algorithmic in nature, may or may not use a computer, are drawn from computer science, and are used to help in problem solving or the execution of simple and complex tasks. In this research, we worked with kindergarten teachers to explore whether CT was evident in children’s free play and the relationship between CT and mathematical thinking (MT). In addition to advancing their own understanding of CT, teachers found considerable overlap between CT and MT in activities engaged in by the children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abu Al Rub, M. F. (2015). Teachers beliefs and technology use in kindergarten and elementary classrooms. World Journal on Educational Technology, 3, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v7i3.202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. (2013). Computing in the national curriculum. A guide for primary teachers. Bedford, UK: Computing at School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E., Robb, M., & Schomburg, R. (2013). Adoption and use of technology in early education. Computers & Education, 69(310–319). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Columbia Government. (2016). $6 million to help connect students with coding, new curriculum and computers. Retrieved from https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2016PREM0065-000994.

  • Canadian Pediatric Society. (2017). Screen time and young children: Promoting health and development in a digital world. Paediatrics & Child Health, 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxx123.

  • Curzon, P., McOwan, P., Plant, N., & Meagher, L. (2014). Introducing teachers to computational thinking using unplugged storytelling. In WiPSCE’14 Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 89–92).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadanidis, G. (2015). Coding as a Trojan horse for mathematics education reform. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34(2), 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J. M., Minniti, L., & White, B. J. G. (2016). Computational thinking, grade 1 students and the Binomial Theorem. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-016-0019-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of England. (2013). National curriculum in England: Computing programmes of study. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study.

  • Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2018). Computational thinking: A competency whose time has come. In S. Sentance, E. Barendsen, & S. Carsten (Eds.), Computer science education: Perspectives on teaching and learning in school (pp. 19–38). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, M. S., Crouser, R. J., & Bers, M. U. (2012). Tangible interaction and learning: The case for a hybrid approach. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(4), 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H. I., & Kim, Y. (2017). The acceptance of computer technology by teachers in early childhood education. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu, C. (2017). A pedagogical framework for computational thinking. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotsopoulos, D., & Lee, J. (2013). What are the development enhancing features of mathematical play? An Leanbh Óg: The OMEP Ireland Journal of Early Childhood Studies, 7, 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotsopoulos, D., & Lee, J. (2014). Let’s talk about math: The LittleCounters® approach to building early math skills. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamagna, E. (2015). Algorithmic thinking unplugged. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 30(6), 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J. J., & Fletcher, G. H. L. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2016). The kindergarten program. Toronto, Ontario: Government of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics/NCTM. (2006). Curriculum focal points: For prekindergarten to grade 8 mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctmmedia.org/cfp/full_document.pdf.

  • Ontario Ministry of Education and Training/OMET. (2005). The Ontario curriculum Grades 1–8 mathematics, Revised. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parette, H., Quesenberry, A., & Blum, C. (2010). Missing the boat with technology usage in early childhood settings: A 21st century view of developmentally appropriate practice. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0352-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Province of New Brunswick. (2016). MIddle school technology education. Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Province of Nova Scotia. (2015). Minister announces coding as a priority during education day. Retrieved from http://novascotia.ca/news/release/?id=20151021002.

  • Repenning, A., Basawapatna, A., & Escherle, N. (2016). Computational thinking tools. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 218–222). https://doi.org/10.1109/vlhcc.2016.7739688.

  • Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SITRA. (2014). Future will be built by those who know how to code. Retrieved from http://www.sitra.fi/en/artikkelit/well-being/future-will-be-built-those-who-know-how-code.

  • Sneider, C., Stephenson, C., Schafer, B., & Flick, L. (2014). Exploring the science framework and NGSS: Computational thinking in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 38(3), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub, T., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. (2012). CS unplugged and middle-school students’ views, attitudes, and intentions regarding CS. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 12(2), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House. (2016). Computer science for all. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-all.

  • van Oers, B. (2010). Emergent mathematical thinking in the context of play. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Communications of the ACM, 49, 33–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yevseyeva, K., & Towhidnejad, M. (2012). Work in progress: Teaching computational thinking in middle and high school. In Paper presented at the 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Wilfrid Laurier University teacher education candidate Nicole Singer for her research support during this study. This research was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Partnership Grant to the first author (grant co-PI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna Kotsopoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Nelson, V., Makosz, S. (2019). Mathematical or Computational Thinking? An Early Years Perspective. In: Robinson, K., Osana, H., Kotsopoulos, D. (eds) Mathematical Learning and Cognition in Early Childhood. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12895-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics