Abstract
Many young children begin school already as significant users of technology. Increasingly, there has been a demand for engaging all school-age children to engage in computational thinking (CT) so that their ability to also be producers of technology in the future is enhanced. CT includes cognitive processes and practices that are algorithmic in nature, may or may not use a computer, are drawn from computer science, and are used to help in problem solving or the execution of simple and complex tasks. In this research, we worked with kindergarten teachers to explore whether CT was evident in children’s free play and the relationship between CT and mathematical thinking (MT). In addition to advancing their own understanding of CT, teachers found considerable overlap between CT and MT in activities engaged in by the children.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abu Al Rub, M. F. (2015). Teachers beliefs and technology use in kindergarten and elementary classrooms. World Journal on Educational Technology, 3, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v7i3.202.
Berry, M. (2013). Computing in the national curriculum. A guide for primary teachers. Bedford, UK: Computing at School.
Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E., Robb, M., & Schomburg, R. (2013). Adoption and use of technology in early education. Computers & Education, 69(310–319). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.024.
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, British Columbia, Canada.
British Columbia Government. (2016). $6 million to help connect students with coding, new curriculum and computers. Retrieved from https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2016PREM0065-000994.
Canadian Pediatric Society. (2017). Screen time and young children: Promoting health and development in a digital world. Paediatrics & Child Health, 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxx123.
Curzon, P., McOwan, P., Plant, N., & Meagher, L. (2014). Introducing teachers to computational thinking using unplugged storytelling. In WiPSCE’14 Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 89–92).
Gadanidis, G. (2015). Coding as a Trojan horse for mathematics education reform. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34(2), 155–173.
Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J. M., Minniti, L., & White, B. J. G. (2016). Computational thinking, grade 1 students and the Binomial Theorem. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-016-0019-3.
Government of England. (2013). National curriculum in England: Computing programmes of study. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study.
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2018). Computational thinking: A competency whose time has come. In S. Sentance, E. Barendsen, & S. Carsten (Eds.), Computer science education: Perspectives on teaching and learning in school (pp. 19–38). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Horn, M. S., Crouser, R. J., & Bers, M. U. (2012). Tangible interaction and learning: The case for a hybrid approach. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(4), 379–389.
Jeong, H. I., & Kim, Y. (2017). The acceptance of computer technology by teachers in early childhood education. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143376.
Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu, C. (2017). A pedagogical framework for computational thinking. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education.
Kotsopoulos, D., & Lee, J. (2013). What are the development enhancing features of mathematical play? An Leanbh Óg: The OMEP Ireland Journal of Early Childhood Studies, 7, 47–68.
Kotsopoulos, D., & Lee, J. (2014). Let’s talk about math: The LittleCounters® approach to building early math skills. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
Lamagna, E. (2015). Algorithmic thinking unplugged. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 30(6), 45–52.
Lu, J. J., & Fletcher, G. H. L. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508959.
Ministry of Education. (2016). The kindergarten program. Toronto, Ontario: Government of Ontario.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics/NCTM. (2006). Curriculum focal points: For prekindergarten to grade 8 mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctmmedia.org/cfp/full_document.pdf.
Ontario Ministry of Education and Training/OMET. (2005). The Ontario curriculum Grades 1–8 mathematics, Revised. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
Parette, H., Quesenberry, A., & Blum, C. (2010). Missing the boat with technology usage in early childhood settings: A 21st century view of developmentally appropriate practice. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0352-x.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Province of New Brunswick. (2016). MIddle school technology education. Author.
Province of Nova Scotia. (2015). Minister announces coding as a priority during education day. Retrieved from http://novascotia.ca/news/release/?id=20151021002.
Repenning, A., Basawapatna, A., & Escherle, N. (2016). Computational thinking tools. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 218–222). https://doi.org/10.1109/vlhcc.2016.7739688.
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047.
SITRA. (2014). Future will be built by those who know how to code. Retrieved from http://www.sitra.fi/en/artikkelit/well-being/future-will-be-built-those-who-know-how-code.
Sneider, C., Stephenson, C., Schafer, B., & Flick, L. (2014). Exploring the science framework and NGSS: Computational thinking in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 38(3), 10–15.
Taub, T., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. (2012). CS unplugged and middle-school students’ views, attitudes, and intentions regarding CS. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 12(2), 8.
The White House. (2016). Computer science for all. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-all.
van Oers, B. (2010). Emergent mathematical thinking in the context of play. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(1), 23–37.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Communications of the ACM, 49, 33–35.
Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 1–16.
Yevseyeva, K., & Towhidnejad, M. (2012). Work in progress: Teaching computational thinking in middle and high school. In Paper presented at the 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings.
Acknowledgements
Thank you to Wilfrid Laurier University teacher education candidate Nicole Singer for her research support during this study. This research was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Partnership Grant to the first author (grant co-PI).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Nelson, V., Makosz, S. (2019). Mathematical or Computational Thinking? An Early Years Perspective. In: Robinson, K., Osana, H., Kotsopoulos, D. (eds) Mathematical Learning and Cognition in Early Childhood. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12895-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12895-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12894-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12895-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)