Abstract
The chapter lays out the theoretical framework of the book, which is mostly inspired by Michel Foucault’s work. It discusses how the author engaged with Foucault during and after his fieldwork. Foucauldian concepts, such as panopticon, docile bodies, biopower, and heterotopia, as well as his notion of bodies as a site of power and resistance, are discussed and connected to the data. Spatial dimensions of same-sex desires and the discursive formation of sexualities are explicated. Foucault’s writing about the technologies of the self, the ethics of being, and confessions are then introduced and discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Islamic Republican party was established in mid-1979 to support Khomeini and the formation of theocracy in Iran. It was disbanded in 1987 (see Axworthy 2013).
- 2.
Said drew on Foucault’s (2002) Archaeology of Knowledge in his discussion/arguments regarding the “exteriorly of representation.” Foucault termed the boundaries between the “excavator” (the observer or the researcher) and subject “exteriority.” This means that the knowledge about the subject or discourse is produced and made known by someone who is outside that discourse, someone who because of his or her position cannot wholly identify with those who are the subjects of that discourse.
- 3.
According to Amnesty International, Iran is ranked as second, after China, in terms of number of executions in 2016. This indicates that the “sovereign power” in Foucauldian sense, take life instead of foster it, is still exercised quite aggressively in Iran (see Amnesty International 2017, April 11).
- 4.
Butler refers to this as the conditional agency of the subject (see Butler 2005).
- 5.
Transmogrify means to change or alter greatly, and often with grotesque or humorous effect. Nietzsche and Foucault use this verb to stress the transgressive aspect of change (Foucault 1984b). According to Butler (1990) this would mean to extend the limits of the norms or what is culturally intelligible, for example, through resignification or other means.
- 6.
In fact the confession chambers in Catholicism resembles the closet and the effects of salvation coming out of those chambers after having confessed.
References
Afary, J., & Anderson, K. (2005). Foucault and the Iranian Revolution. Gender and the Seductions of Islamism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Allan, J. (1999). Actively Seeking Inclusion: Pupils with Special Needs in Mainstream Schools. London: Falmer.
Allan, J. (2008). Rethinking Inclusion: The Philosophers of Difference in Practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Amanat, A. (2017). Iran. A Modern History. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Amnesty International. (2017, April 11). The Death Penalty in 2016: Facts and Figures. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/-news/2017/04/death-penalty-2016-facts-and-figures/.
Arjmand, R. (2017). Public Urban Space, Gender and Segregation. Women-only Urban Parks in Iran. London and New York: Routledge.
Axworthy, M. (2013). Revolutionary Iran. A History of the Islamic Republic. London: Allen Lane/Penguin.
Ball, K. (2005). Organization, Surveillance and the Body: Towards a Politics of Resistance. Organization, 12(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840504857.
Besley, T. (2005). Foucault, Truth Telling and Technologies of the Self in Schools. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 6(1), 76–89.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter. On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (2005). Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
Callis, A. S. (2009, November 25). Playing with Butler and Foucault: Bisexuality and Queer Theory. Journal of Bisexuality, 9(3–4), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299710903316513.
Casey, C. (1995). Work, Self and Society: After Industrialism. London: Sage.
DePalma, R., & Atkinson, E. (2009). Interrogating Heteronormativity in Primary-Schools: Project. London: Trentham Books.
Fleming, P., & Sewell, G. (2002, November 1). Looking for the Good Soldier, Svejk: Alternative Modalities of Resistance in the Contemporary Workplace. Sociology, 36(4), 857–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803850203600404.
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003, February 1). Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance. Organization, 10(1), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508403010001376.
Fornet-Betancourt, R., Becker, H., Gomez-Muller, A., & Gauthier, J. D. (1987). The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom: An Interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984. Philosophy Social Criticism, 12, 112–131.
Foucault, M. (1978). History of Sexuality. Volume I: An Introduction. New York: Random House.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed., and C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1982). Afterword: The Subject and Power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1984a). Of Other Spaces, Heterotopias. Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, 5, 1–9.
Foucault, M. (1984b). Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 76–100). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1988a). The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1988b). Technologies of the Self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality: Vol. 1. An Introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1994). The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1998). The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
Foucault, M. (2002). The Archeology of Knowledge (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (2005). Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the College de France: 1981–1982 (F. Gros, Ed. and G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gramsci, A. (1995). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.
Ingrey, J. C. (2013). The Public School Washroom as Heterotopia: Gendered Spatiality and Subjectification. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. Paper 1768. Ontario: University of Western.
Johnson, P. (2006). Unravelling Foucault’s Different Spaces. History of Human Sciences, 19(4), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695106069669.
Knights, D., & McCabe, D. (2000, August 1). ‘Ain’t Misbehavin’? Opportunities for Resistance under New Forms of ‘Quality’ Management. Sociology, 34(3), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038500000274.
Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-tech Corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Lynch, R. (2011). Foucault’s Theory of Power. In D. Taylor (Ed.), Michel Foucault. Key Concepts (pp. 13–27). Durham: Acumen.
Martino, W., & Kjaran, J. I. (2019). The Politics of Recognizability: Giving an Account of Iranian Gay Men’s Lives Under Repressive Conditions of Sexuality Governance. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 51(1), 21–41.
Mathiesen, T. (1989). Makt og medier. En innföring i mediasosiologi. Oslo: Pax.
Mendieta, E. (2011). The Practice of Freedom. In D. Taylor (Ed.), Michel Foucault. Key Concepts (pp. 111–127). Durham: Acumen.
Ojakangas, M. (2005). Impossible Dialogue on Bio-Power. Agamben and Foucault. Foucault Studies, (2), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i2.856.
Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2006). Biopower today. BioSocieties, 1, 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855206040014014.
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge.
Sedgwick, E. K. (1993). Epistemology of the Closet. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader (pp. 45–62). New York: Routledge.
Sharp, J. P., Routledge, P., Philo, C., & Paddison, R. (2000). Entanglements of Power. Geographies of Domination/Resistance. In J. P. Sharp, P. Routledge, C. Philo, & R. Paddison (Eds.), Entanglements of Power. Geographies of Domination/Resistance (pp. 1–43). London: Routledge.
Steyaert, C. (2010, December). Queering Space: Heterotopic Life in Derek Jarman’s Garden. Gender, Work & Organization, 17(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00404.x.
Tobias, S. (2005). Foucault on Freedom and Capabilities. Theory, Culture and Society, 22(4), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405053721.
Winch, S. (2005, March). Ethics, Government and Sexual Health: Insights from Foucault. Nursing Ethics, 12(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1191/0969733005ne774oa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kjaran, J.I. (2019). Reading Foucault in Tehran. In: Gay Life Stories. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12831-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12831-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12830-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12831-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)