Skip to main content

Reading Foucault in Tehran

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Gay Life Stories
  • 355 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter lays out the theoretical framework of the book, which is mostly inspired by Michel Foucault’s work. It discusses how the author engaged with Foucault during and after his fieldwork. Foucauldian concepts, such as panopticon, docile bodies, biopower, and heterotopia, as well as his notion of bodies as a site of power and resistance, are discussed and connected to the data. Spatial dimensions of same-sex desires and the discursive formation of sexualities are explicated. Foucault’s writing about the technologies of the self, the ethics of being, and confessions are then introduced and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Islamic Republican party was established in mid-1979 to support Khomeini and the formation of theocracy in Iran. It was disbanded in 1987 (see Axworthy 2013).

  2. 2.

    Said drew on Foucault’s (2002) Archaeology of Knowledge in his discussion/arguments regarding the “exteriorly of representation.” Foucault termed the boundaries between the “excavator” (the observer or the researcher) and subject “exteriority.” This means that the knowledge about the subject or discourse is produced and made known by someone who is outside that discourse, someone who because of his or her position cannot wholly identify with those who are the subjects of that discourse.

  3. 3.

    According to Amnesty International, Iran is ranked as second, after China, in terms of number of executions in 2016. This indicates that the “sovereign power” in Foucauldian sense, take life instead of foster it, is still exercised quite aggressively in Iran (see Amnesty International 2017, April 11).

  4. 4.

    Butler refers to this as the conditional agency of the subject (see Butler 2005).

  5. 5.

    Transmogrify means to change or alter greatly, and often with grotesque or humorous effect. Nietzsche and Foucault use this verb to stress the transgressive aspect of change (Foucault 1984b). According to Butler (1990) this would mean to extend the limits of the norms or what is culturally intelligible, for example, through resignification or other means.

  6. 6.

    In fact the confession chambers in Catholicism resembles the closet and the effects of salvation coming out of those chambers after having confessed.

References

  • Afary, J., & Anderson, K. (2005). Foucault and the Iranian Revolution. Gender and the Seductions of Islamism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. (1999). Actively Seeking Inclusion: Pupils with Special Needs in Mainstream Schools. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. (2008). Rethinking Inclusion: The Philosophers of Difference in Practice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amanat, A. (2017). Iran. A Modern History. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International. (2017, April 11). The Death Penalty in 2016: Facts and Figures. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/-news/2017/04/death-penalty-2016-facts-and-figures/.

  • Arjmand, R. (2017). Public Urban Space, Gender and Segregation. Women-only Urban Parks in Iran. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axworthy, M. (2013). Revolutionary Iran. A History of the Islamic Republic. London: Allen Lane/Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, K. (2005). Organization, Surveillance and the Body: Towards a Politics of Resistance. Organization, 12(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840504857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. (2005). Foucault, Truth Telling and Technologies of the Self in Schools. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 6(1), 76–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter. On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2005). Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Callis, A. S. (2009, November 25). Playing with Butler and Foucault: Bisexuality and Queer Theory. Journal of Bisexuality, 9(3–4), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299710903316513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, C. (1995). Work, Self and Society: After Industrialism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePalma, R., & Atkinson, E. (2009). Interrogating Heteronormativity in Primary-Schools: Project. London: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., & Sewell, G. (2002, November 1). Looking for the Good Soldier, Svejk: Alternative Modalities of Resistance in the Contemporary Workplace. Sociology, 36(4), 857–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803850203600404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003, February 1). Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance. Organization, 10(1), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508403010001376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornet-Betancourt, R., Becker, H., Gomez-Muller, A., & Gauthier, J. D. (1987). The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom: An Interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984. Philosophy Social Criticism, 12, 112–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). History of Sexuality. Volume I: An Introduction. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed., and C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). Afterword: The Subject and Power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984a). Of Other Spaces, Heterotopias. Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, 5, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984b). Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 76–100). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988a). The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988b). Technologies of the Self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality: Vol. 1. An Introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994). The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1998). The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2002). The Archeology of Knowledge (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2005). Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the College de France: 1981–1982 (F. Gros, Ed. and G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1995). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingrey, J. C. (2013). The Public School Washroom as Heterotopia: Gendered Spatiality and Subjectification. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. Paper 1768. Ontario: University of Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (2006). Unravelling Foucault’s Different Spaces. History of Human Sciences, 19(4), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695106069669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & McCabe, D. (2000, August 1). ‘Ain’t Misbehavin’? Opportunities for Resistance under New Forms of ‘Quality’ Management. Sociology, 34(3), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038500000274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-tech Corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, R. (2011). Foucault’s Theory of Power. In D. Taylor (Ed.), Michel Foucault. Key Concepts (pp. 13–27). Durham: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W., & Kjaran, J. I. (2019). The Politics of Recognizability: Giving an Account of Iranian Gay Men’s Lives Under Repressive Conditions of Sexuality Governance. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 51(1), 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen, T. (1989). Makt og medier. En innföring i mediasosiologi. Oslo: Pax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendieta, E. (2011). The Practice of Freedom. In D. Taylor (Ed.), Michel Foucault. Key Concepts (pp. 111–127). Durham: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojakangas, M. (2005). Impossible Dialogue on Bio-Power. Agamben and Foucault. Foucault Studies, (2), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i2.856.

  • Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2006). Biopower today. BioSocieties, 1, 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855206040014014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, E. K. (1993). Epistemology of the Closet. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader (pp. 45–62). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, J. P., Routledge, P., Philo, C., & Paddison, R. (2000). Entanglements of Power. Geographies of Domination/Resistance. In J. P. Sharp, P. Routledge, C. Philo, & R. Paddison (Eds.), Entanglements of Power. Geographies of Domination/Resistance (pp. 1–43). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert, C. (2010, December). Queering Space: Heterotopic Life in Derek Jarman’s Garden. Gender, Work & Organization, 17(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00404.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (2005). Foucault on Freedom and Capabilities. Theory, Culture and Society, 22(4), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405053721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, S. (2005, March). Ethics, Government and Sexual Health: Insights from Foucault. Nursing Ethics, 12(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1191/0969733005ne774oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jón Ingvar Kjaran .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kjaran, J.I. (2019). Reading Foucault in Tehran. In: Gay Life Stories. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12831-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12831-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12830-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12831-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics