Skip to main content

Prison Visitation as Accessible Engagement: Encounters, Bystanders, Performance, and Inattention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Prison and the Family

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

Abstract

It has long been recognised within communications and linguistic studies that human interactions cannot be reduced to merely exchanges between two participants. Beyond the dyadic model of communication (involving speaker and listener) are participation frameworks of different kinds, involving multiple actors in diverse contexts. Our focus in this chapter is on prison visitation, and rather than simply seeing it as an exchange between two or more people, we bring to it a concern for the diversified participatory roles which characterise this social interaction. In so doing, we extend extant scholarship of prisoners’ family contact which, although concerned with the visit as a significant aspect of that contact, rarely focuses in close detail on its specificities. We explore the dynamics of prison visits by deploying, for the first time in this field of scholarship, a reading of Goffman’s theorisations of the nature of social interaction. This approach enables us to identify factors which inhibit positive feelings of ‘closeness’ during visits and to make policy recommendations intended to enhance the experience of visitation for prisoners and visitors and the effectiveness of prison systems in enabling beneficial visitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arditti, Joyce A. 2003. “Locked Doors and Glass Walls: Family Visiting at a Local Jail.” Journal of Loss &Trauma 8(2): 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, James, and Patricia L. Hardyman. 2004. “The Risks and Needs of the Returning Prisoner Population.” Review of Policy Research 21(1): 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, William D., and Daniel P. Mears. 2008. “Inmate Social Ties and the Transition to Society: Does Visitation Reduce Recidivism?” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 45(3): 287–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Mark T., and Beth M. Huebner. 2011. “Reentry and the Ties That Bind: An Examination of Social Ties, Employment, and Recidivism.” Justice Quarterly 28(2): 382–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Valerie A., and Grant Duwe. 2017. “Distance Matters: Examining the Factors That Impact Prisoner Visitation in Minnesota.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 44(2): 184–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, Joshua C., and Daniel P. Mears. 2013. “Social Isolation and Inmate Behaviour: A Conceptual Framework for Theorizing Prison Visitation and Guiding and Assessing Research.” Journal of Criminal Justice 41: 252–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, Megan. 2008. Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of the Prison. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, Megan, Olga Grinstead, Kathleen McCartney, Phillippe Bourgois, and Kelly Knight. 2005. “‘You Can’t Do Nothing in This Damn Place’: Sex and Intimacy Among Couples with an Incarcerated Male Partner.” The Journal of Sex Research 42(1): 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, Elaine M. 2004. “Emotion and Performance: Prison Officers and the Presentation of Self in Prisons.” Punishment & Society 6(4): 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, Ben, Jason Warr, Peter Bennett, and Alan Smith. 2014. “The Emotional Geography of Prison Life.” Theoretical Criminology 18(1): 56–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derkzen, Dena Marie, Renee Gobeil, and Justin Gileno. 2009. Visitation and Post-release Outcome Among Federally-Sentenced Offenders. Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duwe, Grant, and Byron R. Johnson. 2016. “The Effects of Prison Visits from Community Volunteers on Offender Recidivism.” The Prison Journal 96(2): 279–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, Elena, and Norberto Costa. 2013. “The Presentation of Self in Everyday Prison Life: Reading Interactions in Prison from a Dramaturgic Point of View.” Global Crime 14(4): 386–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Rebecca. 2017. “Exploring ‘Betwixt and Between’ in a Prison Visitors’ Centre and Beyond.” In Carceral Spatiality: Dialogues Between Geography and Criminology, edited by Dominique Moran and Anna K. Schliehe, 169–198. London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Daniel. 1964. The Effectiveness of a Prison and Parole System. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1966. Involvement: Behavior in Public Places. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Interaction. Oxford, UK: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, Norman, and Donald Miller. 1972. “Explorations in Inmate-Family Relationships.” Research Report #4. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, Marie. 2016. “Visiting Time: A Tale of Two Prisons.” Probation Journal 63(3): 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Yvonne. 2005. “Men Behind Bars ‘Doing’ Masculinity as an Adaptation to Imprisonment.” Men and Masculinities 8(1): 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanier Jr., C.S. 1991. “Dimensions of Father-Child Interaction in a New York State Prison Population.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 16(3–4): 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Siyu, Justin T. Pickett, and Thomas Baker. 2016. “Inside the Black Box: Prison Visitation, the Costs of Offending, and Inmate Social Capital.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 27(8): 766–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, Daniel P., Joshua C. Cochran, Sonja E. Sienneck, and William D. Bales. 2012. “Prison Visitation and Recidivism.” Justice Quarterly 29(6): 888–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Meghan M., Kallee Spooner, Di Jia, and Yan Zhang. 2016. “The Effect of Prison Visitation on Re-entry Success: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Criminal Justice 47: 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Dominique. 2013a. “Carceral Geography and the Spatialities of Prison Visiting: Visitation, Recidivism and Hyperincarceration.” Environment and Planning: D 31(1): 174–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Dominique. 2013b. “Between Outside and Inside? Prison Visiting Rooms as Liminal Carceral Spaces.” GeoJournal 78(2): 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Dominique, and Tom Disney. 2017. “‘It’s a Horrible, Horrible Feeling’: Ghosting and the Layered Geographies of Absent–Presence in the Prison Visiting Room.” Social and Cultural Geography. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2017.1373303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Dominique, Marie A. Hutton, Louise Dixon, and Tom Disney. 2017. “‘Daddy Is a Difficult Word for Me to Hear’: Carceral Geographies of Parenting and the Prison Visiting Room as a Contested Space of Situated Fathering.” Children’s Geographies 15(1): 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Joseph, and David P. Farrington. 2008. “The Effects of Parental Imprisonment on Children.” Crime and Justice 37(1): 133–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlin, Lloyd E. 1954. The Stability and Validity of Parole Experience Tables. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, Goerge. 1992. Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, Nancy. 2016. “Bridging the Gap Between Research and Praxtice: The Role of Science in Addressing the Effects of Incarceration on Family Life.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 665(1): 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siennick, Sonja E., Daniel P. Mears, and William D. Bales. 2013. “Here and Gone: Anticipation and Separation Effects of Prison Visits on Inmate Infractions.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 50(3): 417–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturges, Judith E. 2002. “Visitation at County Jails: Potential Policy Implications.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 13(1): 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasca, Melinda, Philip Mulvey, and Nancy Rodriguez. 2016. “Families Coming Together in Prison: An Examination of Visitation Encounters.” Punishment and Society 18(4): 459–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • T’Jonck, Pieter. 2005. “Intimitiet, intimadatie.” Etcetera 98: 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turanovic, Jillian J., and Melinda Tasca. 2017. “Inmates’ Experiences with Prison Visitation.” Justice Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1385826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique Moran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moran, D., Disney, T. (2019). Prison Visitation as Accessible Engagement: Encounters, Bystanders, Performance, and Inattention. In: Hutton, M., Moran, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Prison and the Family . Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12744-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12744-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12743-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12744-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics