Skip to main content

Configuration of Cultural Powers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Policy and Federalism

Part of the book series: New Directions in Cultural Policy Research ((NDCPR))

  • 293 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, an analysis on how the division of power between states is performed and what are the consequences for cultural policy across a number of federations is presented. This chapter aims to answer one fundamental question: Which level of government has (greater) cultural powers? Who governs culture? Therefore, the focus of this chapter is on the basic “rules of the game” for cultural policy development. This chapter does not focus so much on the social forces, but, rather, insists on the formal institutional settings under which cultural policy and cultural administration develop. A thorough analysis of constitutional frameworks is provided to situate the power structure surrounding cultural policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahearne, J. (2011). Questions of Religion and Cultural Policy in France. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 17(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2010.528837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulos, G. (2013). Management of Living Religious Heritage: Who Sets the Agenda? The Case of the Monastic Community of Mount Athos. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 15(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1179/1350503313z.00000000047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. F. (2002). Of Wild and Cultivated Politics: Conflict and Democracy in Argentina. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 16(1), 99–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argentina, Constitution. (1994). Retrieved online from the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights’ website http://www.biblioteca.jus.gov.ar/argentina-constitution.pdf.

  • Arruda, M. A. D. N. (2003). A política cultural: regulação estatal e mecenato privado. Tempo social, 15(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astor, A., Burchardt, M., & Griera, M. (2017). The Politics of Religious Heritage: Framing Claims to Religion as Culture in Spain. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(1), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australia, Constitution. (2010). Retrieved online from the Parliament of Australia’s website https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Constitution.aspx.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2014). Cultural Funding by Government, 2012–2013. Canberra: Government of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austria, Constitution. (2015). Retrieved online from the Austrian Ministry of for Digital and Economic Affairs’ website http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Erv/ERV_1930_1/ERV_1930_1.pdf.

  • Bakar, I. (2007). Multinational Federation: The Case of Malaysia. In M. Burgess & J. Pinder (Eds.), Multinational Federations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbalho, A. (2007). Políticas culturais no Brasil: identidade e diversidade sem diferença. Conference papers. Encontro multidisciplinares em cultura, Faculcade the communicação/UFB, Savador de Bahia. Retrieved online from the the conference website http://files.ifestcircomira.webnode.com/200000080-ce313d025a/Leitores,%20espectadores%20e%20internautas.pdf.

  • Beaton, M. (2017). The Centennial Cure: Commemoration, Identity, and Cultural Capital in Nova Scotia During Canada’s 1967 Centennial Celebrations. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard, D. (2018). Cultural Policy and Industries of Identity: Québec, Scotland, & Catalonia. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D., & Lecours, A. (2007). Federalism, Nationalism and Social Policy Decentralization in Canada and Belgium. Regional and Federal Studies, 17(4), 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belgium, Constitution. (2014). Retrieved online from the Federal Constitutional Court’s website http://www.const-court.be/en/basic_text/belgian_constitution.pdf.

  • Bennett, O. (2009). On Religion and Cultural Policy: Notes on the Roman Catholic Church. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15(2), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bissoondath, N. (2003). Selling Illusions: The Cult of Multiculturalism in Canada. Peace Research Abstracts, 40(5), 23–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blero, B. (2011). Bruxelles-Hal-Vilvorde, couronne d’épines de l’État fédéral belge? Pouvoirs, 136, 97–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordat, E. M. (2013). Institutionalization and Change in Cultural Policy: CONACULTA and Cultural Policy in Mexico (1988–2006). International Journal of Cultural Policy, 19(2), 222–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordat-Chauvin, É. (2014). De la mobilisation à l’institutionnalisation: une analyse comparative historique des politiques culturelles au Mexique et en Argentine. Pôle Sud, 41(2), 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordat-Chauvin, E. (2018). Les politiques culturelles en Argentine et au Mexique. Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazil, Constitution. (2013). Retrieved online from the Supreme Court of Brazil’s website http://www.stf.jus.br/repositorio/cms/portalStfInternacional/portalStfSobreCorte_en_us/anexo/Constitution_2013.pdf.

  • Broschek, J. (2010). Federalism and Political Change: Canada and Germany in Historical-Institutionalist Perspective. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423909990023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brune, K. (2015). Subversive Instruments: Protest and Politics of MPB and the Nueva Canción. Studies in Latin American Popular Culture, 33(1), 128–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet, M. (1953). Premières réactions des vaincus de 1760 devant leurs vainqueurs. Revue d’histoire de l’Amérique française, 6(4), 506–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Constitutional Acts 1867 to 1982. (2013). Retrieved online from the Ministry of Justice’s website http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/CONST_E.pdf.

  • Canada, Parliament of Canada. (1985). Canadian Multiculturalism Act. Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission. (2009). Approches internationales en matière de financement de la radio communautaire et de la radio de campus (Rapport final). Ottawa. Retrieved online from the CRTC’s website https://crtc.gc.ca/fra/publications/reports/radio/connectus0903.pdf.

  • Cardinal, L. (2000). Le pouvoir exécutif et la judiciarisation de la politique au Canada. Une étude du programme de contestation judiciaire. Politique et sociétés, 19(2–3), 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinal, L. (2008). Le fédéralisme asymétrique et les minorités linguistiques nationales. Sudbury, ON: Prise de parole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinal, L., Lang, S., & Sauvé, A. (2008). Les minorités francophones hors Québec et la gouvernance des langues officielles: portrait et enjeux. Francophonies d’Amérique (26), 209–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1997). Language Management, Official Bilingualism, and Multiculturalism in Canada. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500003354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compendium of Cultural Policies and Trends. (2016). Austria: 5.1, General Legislation. Retrieved online from the Compendium’s website https://www.culturalpolicies.net/web/austria.php?aid=512.

  • Coulthard, G. S. (2007). Subjects of Empire: Indigenous Peoples and the ‘Politics of Recognition’ in Canada. Contemporary Political Theory, 6(4), 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couture, C. (2001). La disparition inévitable des francophones à l’extérieur du Québec: un fait inéluctable ou le reflet d’un discours déterministe? Francophonies d’Amérique, 11, 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagenais, M. (2015). ‘L’histoire dira que Lord Durham a préféré une petite faction, et l’exposera comme une des aberrations humaines de notre époque’: Comment Lord Durham perdit l’appui des Canadiens français. Bulletin d’histoire politique, 23(2), 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delwit, P. (2012). La vie politique en Belgique de 1830 à nos jours. Bruxelles: Les éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Cayeros, A. (2006). Federalism, Fiscal Authority and Centralization in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Domenichelli, L. (1999). Comparaison entre les stratégies linguistiques de Belgique et du Canada. Globe: Revue internationale d’études québécoises, 2(2), 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnat, O. (2003). La question de la démocratisation dans la politique culturelle française. Modern & Contemporary France, 11(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellmeier, A. (2003). Cultural Entrepreneurialism: on the Changing Relationship Between the Arts, Culture and Employment. The International Journal of Cultural Policy, 9(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epp, C. R. (1996). Do Bills of Rights Matter? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. American Political Science Review, 90(4), 765–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erk, J. (2004). Austria: A Federation Without Federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 34(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erk, J. (2007). Explaining Federalism: State, Society and Congruence in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany and Switzerland. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Filewood, A. (2018). A Confederation Minstrel Show: The Centennial Play of 1967. Canadian Theatre Review, 174, 48–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice, J. (1996). The Politics of Belgium: A Unique Federalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulon, C. L. (1990). Des Beaux-Arts aux Affaires culturelles (1959–1969): Les entourages d’André Malraux et les structures du ministère. Vingtième siècle. Revue d’histoire, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcea, J. (2009). Postulations on the Fragmentary Effects of Multiculturalism in Canada. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 40(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1353/ces.0.0059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germany, Constitution. (2017). Retrieved online from the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany’ website https://www.btg-bestellservice.de/pdf/80201000.pdf.

  • Hawkes, D. (2004). Indigenous Peoples: Self-Government and Intergovernmental Relations. Peace Research Abstracts, 41(2), 233900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. (1993). Belgium: From Regionalism to Federalism. Regional & Federal Studies, 3(1), 44–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacovetta, F., Perin, R., & Principe, A. (Eds.). (2000). Enemies Within: Italian and Other Internees in Canada and Abroad. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • India, Constitution. (2007). Retrieved online from the National Portal of the Government of India’s website https://www.india.gov.in/sites/upload_files/npi/files/coi_part_full.pdf.

  • Jonson, L., & Erofeev, A. (Eds.). (2017). Russia-Art Resistance and the Conservative-Authoritarian Zeitgeist. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koptseva, N. P., Luzan, V. S., Razumovskaya, V. A., & Kirko, V. I. (2017). The Content Analysis of the Russian Federal and Regional Basic Legislation on the Cultural Policy. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 30(1), 23–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunimoto, N. (2004). Intimate Archives: Japanese-Canadian Family Photography, 1939–1949. Art History, 27(1), 129–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuran-Burçoğlu, N. (2011). The Impact of Islamic Sects on Education and the Media in Turkey. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 17(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2010.549562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, Y. (1975). Étude critique du recensement du Canada de 1765. Revue d’histoire de l’Amérique française, 29(3), 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, H. H. (2013). Canadian Multiculturalism in the 21st Century: Emerging Challenges and Debates. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 43(3), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh, F. K. W. (2010). Restructuring Federal-State Relations in Malaysia: From Centralised to Co-operative Federalism? The Round Table, 99(407), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358531003656180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, A. C. (2016). The Influence of Regime Type on Russian Foreign Policy Toward “the West,” 1992–2015, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 49(1), 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaysia, Constitution. (2007). Retrieved online from the Attorney General’s Chamber of Malaysia’s website http://www.agc.gov.my/agcportal/uploads/files/Publications/FC/Federal%20Consti%20(BI%20text).pdf.

  • Malaysia, Ministry of Tourism and Culture. (2015). History. Retrieved online from the Ministry of Tourism and Culture’s website http://www.motac.gov.my/en/profile/history.

  • McCann, P. J. C., Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2015). Top-Down Federalism: State Policy Responses to National Government Discussions. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 45(4), 495–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mexico, Constitution of Mexico. Retrieved online from the Organization of American States’ website https://www.oas.org/juridico/mla/en/mex/en_mex-int-text-const.pdf.

  • Morton, F. L. (1995). The Effect of the Charter of Rights on Canadian Federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 25(3), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, K. V. (1995). Public Culture and Political Culture: La Politique Culturelle du Quebec. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 25(3), 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, K. V. (2017). Public Culture, Cultural Identity, Cultural Policy: Comparative Perspectives. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, I. I., & Vencio, E. (2009). Maintaining Two Worlds: The Relevance of Mother Tongue in Brazil’s Amerindian Societies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(4), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802588506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. (2011). Religion and Cultural Policy: Two Museum Case Studies. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 17(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrowski, C. (2004). Books, Maps, and Politics: A Cultural History of the Library of Congress, 1783–1861. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paglin, M. D. (Ed.). (1989). A Legislative History of the Communications Act of 1934. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papillon, M. (2011). Adapting Federalism: Indigenous Multilevel Governance in Canada and the United States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 42(2), 289–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquette, J. (2010). La réforme des musées nationaux du Canada: les défis professionnels et managériaux de la recherche. Canadian Public Administration, 53(3), 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquette, J. (2019, forthcoming). La politique muséale du Québec: Trajectoires historiques de l’évolution d’un service public. Politiques et sociétés, 38(1), 20 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquette, J., Beauregard, D., & Gunter, C. (2017). Settler Colonialism and Cultural Policy: the Colonial Foundations and Refoundations of Canadian Cultural Policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(3), 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paschalidis, G. (2009). Exporting National Culture: Histories of Cultural Institutes Abroad. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15(3), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romainville, C. (2009). Les fondements d’une politique culturelle commune. Études théâtrales, 46(3), 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roszko, E. (2012). From Spiritual Homes to National Shrines: Religious Traditions and Nation-Building in Vietnam. East Asia, 29(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-011-9156-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russian Federation. (2008). Constitution of the Russian Federation. Oxford Constitutional Law Online. http://oxcon.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:ocw/law-ocw-cd1023-H2008.regGroup.1/law-ocw-cd1023-h2008?prd=OXCON#law-ocw-cd1023-h2008-div2-1.

  • Selcher, W. A. (1989). A New Start Toward a More Decentralized Federalism in Brazil? Publius, 19(3), 167–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulist, S. (2016). Indigenous Names, Revitalization Politics, and Regimes of Recognition in the Northwest Amazon. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 21(2), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlca.12189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simard, J. J. (1986). L’envol du Québec anglais. Recherches sociographiques, 27(2), 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simis, A. (2007). A política cultural como política pública. Políticas culturais no Brasil. Conference papers. Encontro multidisciplinares em cultura, Faculcade the communicação/UFB, Savador de Bahia. Retrieved online from the conference website http://www.cult.ufba.br/enecult2007/AnitaSimis.pdf.

  • Statistics Canada. (2010). Government Expenditures on Culture: Data Tables. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenden, W., & Jans, M. T. (2006). Will It Stay or Will It Go? Federalism and the Sustainability of Belgium. West European Politics, 29(5), 877–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Switzerland, Constitution. (2018). Retrieved online from the Swiss Federal Council’s website https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classified-compilation/19995395/201801010000/101.pdf.

  • Upchurch, A. (2007). Linking Cultural Policy from Great Britain to Canada. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630701556407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uyttendaele, M. (1999). Constitution et régime linguistique en Belgique et au Canada. Brussels: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, S. (2010). The State of Indigenous America Series: Federalism, Indian Policy, and the Patterns of History. Wicazo Sa Review, 25(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P. M., & Rodríguez, V. E. (1999). New Federalism, Intra-governmental Relations and Co-governance in Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies, 31(3), 673–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesner, S. (2018). Artists’ Voices in Cultural Policy: Careers, Myths and the Creative Profession After German Reunification. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • US Constitution. Article I. Retrieved online from the Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School’s website https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei#section1.

  • US Constitution. Tenth Amendment. Retrieved online from the Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School’s website https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/tenth_amendment.

  • Zamora, S., & Cossío, J. R. (2006). Mexican Constitutionalism After Presidencialismo. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4(2), 411–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Paquette .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paquette, J. (2019). Configuration of Cultural Powers. In: Cultural Policy and Federalism. New Directions in Cultural Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12680-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics