Skip to main content

Test-Based Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation Using Hurty/Craig-Bampton Substructure Representations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

This work presents a method for uncertainty propagation that is consistent with the “building-block approach” in which components of a system are tested and validated individually instead of an integrated vehicle test and validation being performed. The approach gives a unified methodology for representing and quantifying uncertainty in a Hurty/Craig-Bampton component based on component test results and propagating the uncertainty in component models into system-level predictions. Uncertainty in the Hurty/Craig-Bampton representations is quantified using a new hybrid parametric variation approach based on Soize’s maximum entropy method. The proposed approach combines parametric and nonparametric uncertainty by treating the Hurty/Craig-Bampton fixed-interface eigenvalues as random variables and treating the corresponding mass and stiffness as random matrices. The proposed method offers several advantages over traditional approaches to uncertainty quantification in structural dynamics: the number of parametric random variables is relatively small compared to the usually large number of potential random finite element model parameters; therefore, time-consuming parametric sensitivity studies do not have to be performed. In addition, nonparametric model-form uncertainty is easily included using random matrix theory. The method requires the selection of dispersion values for the Hurty/Craig-Bampton fixed-interface eigenvalues and the corresponding mass and stiffness matrices. Test/analysis frequency error is used to identify the fixed-interface eigenvalue dispersions, and test/analysis cross-orthogonality is used to identify the Hurty/Craig-Bampton stiffness matrix dispersion value. Currently, the mass matrix dispersion is based on engineering judgment, past experience, and historical results. The proposed uncertainty quantification methodology is applied to the Space Launch System liftoff configuration. Robustness of the attitude control system is studied by propagating derived component uncertainty models into gain uncertainty in specific transfer functions relating engine inputs to rate sensors on the core stage, and frequency uncertainty for the fundamental bending and roll modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

aftRGA:

Aft rate gyro assembly

COV:

Coefficient of variation

CS:

Core stage

DCGM:

Diagonal cross-generalized mass metric

DOF:

Degree of freedom

FEM:

Finite element model

GNC:

Guidance, navigation, and control

HCB:

Hurty/Craig-Bampton

HPV:

Hybrid parametric variation

ICPS:

Interim cryogenic propulsion stage

ISPE:

Integrated spacecraft payload element

itRGA:

Intertank rate gyro assembly

LSRB:

Left solid rocket booster

LVSA:

Launch vehicle stage adapter

MC:

Monte Carlo

ME:

Maximum entropy

MEM:

Modal effective mass

MPC:

Multipoint constraint

MPCV:

Multi-purpose crew vehicle

MSA:

MPCV stage adapter

ODM:

Off-diagonal generalized mass metric

PDF:

Probability distribution function

RINU:

Replaceable inertial navigation unit

RMS:

Root mean square

RMT:

Random matrix theory

RSRB:

Right solid rocket booster

RSS:

Root sum square

SE:

Strain energy

SLS:

Space launch system

TAM:

Test analysis model

UQ:

Uncertainty quantification

XO:

Cross-orthogonality

References

  1. Craig, R.R., Bampton, M.C.C.: Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis. AIAA J. 6, 1313–1319 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghanem, R., Spanos, P.: Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach. Springer, New York (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Wishart, J.: Generalized product moment distribution in samples. Biometrika. 20A(1–2), 32–52 (1928)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wigner, E.: Characteristic vectors of bordered matrices with infinite dimensions. Ann. Math. 62(3), 548–564 (1955)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Soize, C.: A nonparametric model of random uncertainties for reduced matrix models in structural dynamics. Probab. Eng. Mech. 15(3), 277–294 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Soize, C.: Maximum entropy approach for modeling random uncertainties in transient elastodynamics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109(5), 1979–1996 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adhikari, S.: Wishart random matrices in probabilistic structural mechanics. J. Eng. Mech. 134(12), 1029–1044 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adhikari, S.: Generalized wishart distribution for probabilistic structural dynamics. Comput. Mech. 45, 495–511 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Capiez-Lernout, E., Pellissetti, M., Pradlwarter, H., Schueller, G.I., Soize, C.: Data and model uncertainties in complex aerospace engineering systems. J. Sound Vib. 295(3–5), 923–938 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pellissetti, M., Capiez-Lernout, E., Pradlwarte, H., Soize, C., Schueller, G.: Reliability analysis of a satellite structure with a parametric and a non-parametric probabilistic model. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198(2), 344–357 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Mignolet, M., Soize, C., Avalos, J.: Nonparametric stochastic modeling of structures with uncertain boundary conditions/coupling between substructures. AIAA J. 51(6), 1296–1308 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ben-Israel, A., Greville, T.: Generalized Inverses: Theory and Applications, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Blelloch, P.: Cross-orthogonality of closely spaced modes. In: IMAC, St. Louis (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel C. Kammer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kammer, D.C., Blelloch, P., Sills, J.W. (2020). Test-Based Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation Using Hurty/Craig-Bampton Substructure Representations. In: Walber, C., Walter, P., Seidlitz, S. (eds) Sensors and Instrumentation, Aircraft/Aerospace, Energy Harvesting & Dynamic Environments Testing, Volume 7. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12676-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12676-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12675-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12676-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics