Abstract
This chapter draws on two bodies of literature—psychology and information technology (IT)—to examine how police investigate and prosecute cyberstalking. It critically examines the Stalking Risk Profile (MacKenzie et al. 2011) with respect to its relevance for assessing the risk of cyberstalking. It is argued that for police investigators and prosecutors to be proactive in policing cyberstalking, risk assessments need to adapt to constantly changing technology and the implications for technological change for interpersonal relationships. The chapter also explores police understandings of technological advancements by demonstrating a distinction between those who are pre-digital (‘digital immigrants’) or post-digital (‘digital natives’) (2001). The chapter presents findings from preliminary research that involved interviews with police investigators and prosecutors regarding challenges for policing cyberstalking.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Alosi, H. (2017, March 27). Technology-facilitated abuse: The new breed of domestic violence. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/technology-facilitated-abuse-the-new-breed-of-domestic-violence-74683. Accessed October 20, 2018.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2017). 8153.0—Internet Activity, Australia. December 2016. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/8153.0. Accessed January 12, 2018.
Avakame, E. F., & Fyfe, J. J. (2001). Differential police treatment of male-on-female spousal violence: Additional evidence on the leniency thesis. Violence Against Women,7(1), 22–45.
Banyard, V. L., Demers, J. M., Cohn, E. S., Edwards, K. M., Moynihan, M. M., Walsh, W. A., et al. (2017). Academic correlates of unwanted sexual contact, intercourse, stalking, and intimate partner violence: An understudied but important consequence for college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, ifirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517715022.
Barassi, V., & Treré, E. (2012). Does Web 3.0 come after Web 2.0? Deconstructing theoretical assumptions through practice. New Media & Society, 14(8): 1269–1285.
Bocij, P. (2004). Cyberstalking: Harassment in the Internet Age and How to Protect Your Family. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Casey, E. (2011). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers, and the Internet. London: Elsevier Academic Press.
Cavezza, C., & McEwan, T. E. (2014). Cyberstalking versus off-line stalking in a forensic sample. Psychology, Crime & Law,20(10), 955–970.
Crime Statistics Agency. (2017). Recorded offences. https://www.crimestatistics.vic.gov.au/crime-statistics/latest-crime-data/recorded-offences-. Accessed January 19, 2018.
Doyle, M. (2017). Angela’s horror: Stalked, stabbed, doused in petrol by Tinder date. https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/current-affairs/angelas-horror-stalked-stabbed-doused-in-petrol-by-tinder-date/news-story/a6ccf9175f835ddf34bfa0384bb0912c. Accessed March 30, 2018.
Edwards, R., & Holland, J. (2013). What Is Qualitative Interviewing? London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Fuchs, C., Hofkirchner, W., Schafranek, M., Raffl, C., Sandoval, M., & Bichler, R. (2010). Theoretical foundations of the web: Cognition, communication, and co-operation—Towards an understanding of Web 1.0, 2.0, 3.0. Future Internet, 2(1): 41–59.
Hansen, E. C. (2006). Successful Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Introduction. London: Allen & Unwin.
Haron, H., & Yusof, F. B. M. (2010). Cyber stalking: The social impact of social networking technology. In International Conference on Education and Management Technology (ICEMT) (pp. 237–241).
Lyndon, A., Bonds-Raacke, J., & Cratty, A. D. (2011). College students’ Facebook stalking of ex-partners. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,14(12), 711–716.
MacKenzie, R., McEwan, T., Pathé, M., James, D., Ogloff, J., & Mullen, P. (2011). Types of stalking. https://www.stalkingriskprofile.com/what-is-stalking/types-of-stalking. Accessed November 16, 2017.
McCulloch, J., Maher, J., Fitz-Gibbon, K., Segrave, M., & Roffee, J. (2016). Review of the Family Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Management Framework (CRAF). Melbourne, Australia: Monash University.
McEwan, T., Pathé, M., & Ogloff, J. (2011). Advancing stalking risk assessment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law,29(2), 180–201.
Mishra, A., & Mishra, D. (2013). Cyber stalking: A challenge for web security. In J. Bishop (Ed.), Examining the Concepts, Issues, and Implications of Internet Trolling. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Mullen, P. E., Pathé, M., & Purcell, R. (2009). Stalkers and Their Victims (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mullen, P. E., Mackenzie, R., Ogloff, J. R., Pathé, M., McEwan, T., & Purcell, R. (2006). Assessing and managing the risks in the stalking situation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online,34(4), 439–450.
Naik, U., & Shivalingaiah, D. (2008). Comparative study of Web 1.0, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0. Paper presented to 6th International Convention on Automation of Libraries in Education and Research.
Perez Trujillo, M., & Ross, S. (2008). Police response to domestic violence: Making decisions about risk and risk management. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,23(4), 454–473.
Piovesan, A. (2016). New study looks at stalking amid rise in reported cases. http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/06/06/new-study-looks-stalking-amid-rise-reported-cases-0. Accessed December 21, 2017.
Prensky, M. (2001, October). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. NCB University Press.
Proudman, D., & Olding, R. (2016). Man shot by police stalked, stabbed ex-girlfriend after she ended relationship. https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/man-shot-by-police-stalked-stabbed-exgirlfriend-after-she-ended-relationship-20161104-gshwq2.html. Accessed June 9, 2018.
Reyns, B. W. (2010). A situational crime prevention approach to cyberstalking victimization: Preventive tactics for internet users and online place managers. Crime Prevention and Community Safety,12(2), 99–118.
Reyns, B. W., Henson, B., & Fisher, B. S. (2012). Stalking in the twilight zone: Extent of cyberstalking victimization and offending among college students. Deviant Behavior,33(1), 1–25.
Rosenfeld, B. (2004). Violence risk Factors in stalking and obsessional harassment: A review and preliminary meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior,31(1), 9–36.
Schwartz-Watts, D. M. (2006). Commentary: Stalking risk profile. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online,34(4), 455–457.
Scott, A. J., Lloyd, R., & Gavin, J. (2010). The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking in the United Kingdom and Australia. Criminal Justice and Behavior,37(11), 1185–1194.
Thompson, C. M., Dennison, S. M., & Stewart, A. L. (2013). Are different risk factors associated with moderate and severe stalking violence? Examining factors from the integrated theoretical model of stalking violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior,40(8), 850–880.
Tjaden, P. G., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Victorian Royal Commission into Family Violence. (2016). Summary and recommendations. http://www.rcfv.com.au/MediaLibraries/RCFamilyViolence/Reports/RCFV_Full_Report_Interactive.pfd. Accessed October 3, 2017.
Woodlock, D. (2013). Technology-Facilitated Stalking: Findings and Recommendations from the SmartSafe Project. Carlton, Australia: Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Shea, B., Julian, R., Prichard, J., Kelty, S. (2019). Challenges in Policing Cyberstalking: A Critique of the Stalking Risk Profile in the Context of Online Relationships. In: Lumsden, K., Harmer, E. (eds) Online Othering. Palgrave Studies in Cybercrime and Cybersecurity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12633-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12633-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12632-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12633-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)