Skip to main content

Implementing and Practicing Collaborative Problem Solving with Integrity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1104 Accesses

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Psychiatry ((CCPSY))

Abstract

This chapter will help the reader understand the importance of maintaining integrity to the Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) approach and describes tools available for assessing CPS integrity. It includes a brief review of the literature on treatment integrity and discusses CPS integrity at the individual caregiver level (e.g., how do we ensure that a clinician or other caregiver is “doing” CPS well) and at the agency level. Finally, the authors present recommendations for how an individual in an organization can measure, monitor, and improve CPS integrity, based on their experiences assessing CPS integrity in agencies that have implemented CPS site-wide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Throughout the literature on this topic, the terms integrity and fidelity often are used interchangeably. For the purpose of continuity, we use integrity in this chapter, even if we are reviewing work that has been done under other terms.

  2. 2.

    Throughout this chapter, we will refer to the individual that is the target of CPS as a “client,” with the understanding that in your setting, the client may be better described by “patient,” “student,” “resident,” or something else.

  3. 3.

    Many tools like these are available, for free, from www.thinkkids.org.

References

  1. Hill LG, Maucione K, Hood BK. A focused approach to assessing program fidelity. Prev Sci. 2007;8(1):25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perepletchikova F, Treat TA, Kazdin AE. Treatment integrity in psychotherapy research: analysis of the studies and examination of the associated factors. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75(6):829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3–4):327–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Waltz J, Addis ME, Koerner K, Jacobson NS. Testing the integrity of a psychotherapy protocol: assessment of adherence and competence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61(4):620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bond GR, Becker DR, Drake RE. Measurement of fidelity of implementation of evidence‐based practices: case example of the IPS Fidelity Scale. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2011;18(2):126–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoenwald SK, Sheidow AJ, Chapman JE. Clinical supervision in treatment transport: effects on adherence and outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77(3):410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hogue A, Liddle HA, Rowe C. Treatment adherence process research in family therapy: a rationale and some practical guidelines. Psychother Theor Res Pract Train. 1996;33(2):332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schoenwald SK, Carter RE, Chapman JE, Sheidow AJ. Therapist adherence and organizational effects on change in youth behavior problems one year after multisystemic therapy. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2008;35(5):379–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chorpita BF, Taylor AA, Francis SE, Moffitt C, Austin AA. Efficacy of modular cognitive behavior therapy for childhood anxiety disorders. Behav Ther. 2004;35(2):263–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chu BC, Kendall PC. Therapist responsiveness to child engagement: flexibility within manual-based CBT for anxious youth. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65(7):736–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobson NS, Schmaling KB, Holtzworth-Munroe A, Katt JL, Wood LF, Follette VM. Research-structured vs clinically flexible versions of social learning-based marital therapy. Behav Res Ther. 1989;27(2):173–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alisha R. Pollastri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Materials

In this video, Dr. Alisha R. Pollastri, Director of Research and Evaluation at Think:Kids, describes the provocative results of a groundbreaking study of integrity rating tools used to assess fidelity of implementation of CPS and their relation to outcomes (MP4 227851 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pollastri, A.R., Wezdenko, A. (2019). Implementing and Practicing Collaborative Problem Solving with Integrity. In: Pollastri, A., Ablon, J., Hone, M. (eds) Collaborative Problem Solving. Current Clinical Psychiatry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12630-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12630-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12629-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12630-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics