Abstract
This chapter is a very personal and subjective overview of some potentially harmful aspects of society and education in Japan. Social psychology has warned us for many years about the danger of increasing isolation and individualization (III) along with reactive affiliations (e.g. Nazism) just for the sake of belonging to something. Fromm wrote in his 1941 book Escape from Freedom, “to feel completely alone and isolated leads to mental disintegration just as physical starvation leads to death” (p. 17). More recently, biology (Wilson, 1975/2000) and neuroscience (Lieberman, 2013; Cosolino, 2013; Sapolsky, 2018) have stressed and exposed our social needs. Hari’s recent book Lost Connections (2018) has exposed the billion-dollar antidepressant industry as mostly unnecessary when we learn how to socially reconnect with others and our core values. And most recently the UK has created a minister for loneliness position in their government (BBC, 2018) to fight the ill effects of III. Schools it would seem are places where students can go to become more social, but while we teach students in groups we evaluate and score them individually and the amount of social interactions in many classrooms does not often add to a sense of school belonging (Dörnyei & Murphey, 2003; Murphey et al., 2010). This chapter looks at ways to innovate and activate “the collaborative social” in general and during assessments in particular so that students can become more socially adept at bonding and belonging with others. It is unapologetically a blend of several articles and book chapters beginning 30 years ago with my student-made tests (Murphey, 1989). In the introduction below I also reflectively note autobiographically seven sources of innovative practices that I fortunately encountered that I think will tell us how to seed many future innovations in education in Japan. The introduction is followed by three waves of activity around innovating testing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allwright, D. (1984). Why don’t learners learn what teachers teach?—The interaction hypothesis. In D. M. Singleton & D. G. Little (Eds.), Language learning in formal and informal contexts. Dublin: IRAAL.
Brown, J. D. (1996). Testing in language programs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brown, J. D. (Ed.). (1998). New ways of classroom assessment. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York: Pearson.
Clarke, M. (2003). A place to stand: Essays for educators in troubled times (law meaning, and violence). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press ELT.
Cosolino, L. (2013). The social neuroscience of education: Optimizing attachment and learning in the classroom. New York: W. W. Norton.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunbar, R. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology,6, 178–190.
Falout, J. (2013). The social crux: Motivational transformations of EFL students in Japan. In T. Coverdale-Jones (Ed.), Transnational higher education in the Asian context (pp. 132–148). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fromm, E. (original 1941, 1961 ed.). Escape from freedom. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
Hari, J. (2018). Lost Connections: Uncovering the real causes of depression—and the unexpected solutions. London: Bloomsbury.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London: Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research,77(1), 81–112.
Karabenick, S. A., & Knapp, J. R. (1991). Relationship of academic help seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instrumental achievement behavior in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology,83, 221–230.
Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Kohn, A. (2000). The case against standardized testing: Raising the scores, ruining the schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lieberman, M. (2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. New York: Crown.
Minister for loneliness appointed to continue Jo Cox’s work. (2018, January 17). BBC. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42708507.
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75(1), 33–52.
Murphey, T. (1989). Student-made tests. Modern English Teacher,17(1&2), 28–29.
Murphey, T. (1993). Why don’t teachers learn what learners learn? Taking the guesswork out with action logging. English Teaching Forum,31(1), 6–10.
Murphey, T. (1994). Tests: Learning through negotiated interaction. TESOL Journal,4(2), 12–16.
Murphey, T. (1998). Self-evaluated video. In J. D. Brown (Ed.), New ways of classroom assessment (pp. 64–66). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Murphey, T. (2003a). Assessing the individual: Theatre of the absurd. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 7(1), 2–5. Available online at www.jalt.org/test/mur_2.htm.
Murphey, T. (2003b). JFL and EFL videoing student conversations. In JALT 2002 Conference Proceedings (pp. 50–53). Tokyo, Japan: JALT.
Murphey, T. (2010). The tale that wags. Nagoya: Perceptia Press.
Murphey, T. (2011). Yureugoku shippo. Nagoya: Perceptia Press.
Murphey, T. (2013a). Turning testing into healthy helping and the creation of social capital. PeerSpectives, 10, 27–31.
Murphey, T. (2013b, October). With or without you and radical social testing. Po’okela (Hawai’I Pacific University Newsletter), 20(69), 6–7.
Murphey, T. (2016). Teaching to learn and well-become: Many mini-renaissances. In P. McIntyre, T. Gregerson, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 324–343). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Murphey, T. (2017a). Asking students to teach: Gardening in the jungle. In T. Gregersen & P. MacIntyre (Eds.), Exploring innovations in language teacher education (pp. 251–268). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Murphey, T. (2017b). Provoking potentials: Student self evaluated and socially mediated testing. In R. Al-Mahrooqi, C. Coombe, F. Al-Maamari, & V. Thakur (Eds.), Revisiting EFL assessment: critical perspectives (pp. 287–317). New York: Springer.
Murphey, T. (2017c). A 4-page condensed version of Tim Murphey’s book chapter “Provoking Potentials: Student Self-Evaluated and Socially-Mediated Testing”. Available at STANFORD University’s eNewsletter by Rick Reis “Tomorrow’s Professor”, https://tomprof.stanford.edu/mail/1581#June 30.
Murphey, T., & Falout, J. (2010). Critical participatory looping: Dialogic member checking with whole classes. TESOL Quarterly,44(4), 811–821.
Murphey, T., Falout, J., Fukuda, T., & Fukada, Y. (2014). Socio-dynamic motivating through idealizing classmates. System,45, 242–253.
Murphey, T., Kim, M., Kusutani, S., Lawson, J., Sugawara, M., & Yamaura, N. (2008). Publishing ecologies. OnCUE Journal,2(3), 206–220.
Murphey, T., & Morris, S. (2018). Short emotional peace video recommendations. Positive Peace Pedagogy Papers #1, 7–9. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gLaZAM_ot7Eb_rz6HnDfBz0Yb8sKtdaE.
Murphey, T., Prober, J., & Gonzáles, K. (2010). Emotional belonging precedes learning. In A. M. F. Barcelos & H. S. Coelho (Eds.), Emoções, reflexões e (trans)formações de professores e formadores de línguas [Emotions, reflections, and (trans)formations of language teachers and teacher educators] (pp. 43–56). Campinas, Sao Paulo: Pontes Publishers.
Murphey, T., & Woo, L. (1998). Videoing student conversations: Educational video’s daimond in the rough. The Language Teacher,22(8), 21–24.
Murphey, T., Wright, M., & Kondo, Y. (1991). Frozen vs responding models of language curriculum. Journal of the Nanzan Academic Society,51, 1–16.
Nelson-Le Gall, S. (1981). Help-seeking: An understudied problem-solving skill in children. Developmental Review,1, 224–226.
Nelson-Le Gall, S. (1985). Help-seeking behavior in learning. American Educational Research Association,12, 55–90.
Newman, R. S., & Schwager, M. T. (1993). Students’ perceptions of the teacher and classmates in relation to reported help seeking in math class. Elementary School Journal,94, 3–17.
Norton, B. (2001). Non-participation, imagined communities and the language classroom. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 159–171). London: Pearson Education.
Pennycook, A. (2010). Critical applied linguistics. New York: Routledge.
Rivers, W. (1975). Speaking in many tongues: Essays in foreign-language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
Rodiger, H., & Finn, B. (2009, October). Getting it wrong: Surprising tips on how to learn. Scientific American: Mind Matters. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/getting-it-wrong/ and http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=getting-it-wrong.
Roediger, H. (2014, July 20). How tests make us smarter. The New York Times Sunday Review. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/20/opinion/sunday/how-tests-make-us-smarter.html.
Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1977). “Should I ask for help?” The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 329–341.
Sapolsky, R. (2018). Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst. London: Penguin.
Shaw, G. B. (2008). Annajanska. Accessed June 10, 2008 from http://www.notable-quotes.com/s/shaw_george_bernard.html (original source: Maxims for Revolutionists).
Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. New York: Longman.
Smith, R. (2015). Exploratory action research as workplan: Why, what and where from? In K. Dikilitas, R. Smith, & W. Trotman (Eds.), Teacher-researchers in action (pp. 37–45). Faversham, UK: IATEFL.
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2011). Socio cultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Wilson, E. O. (2000). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Quiz 1 for Group Dynamics and the Social Brain. Fall 2017. Students n = 27
Social testing with student changing partners every few minutes (circa 2014). They can only ask one or two questions per person, and are not supposed to look at the papers, only ask and listen and write. About 20 minutes of solo time at the beginning and then 10–20 minutes social time. When there is a question that no one seems to be getting, I go to a low-level shy student and help him find the answer, then I announce to the class, “Hiro has the answer to #8” and suddenly Hiro gets a lot of attention and can enjoy helping many people.
Appendix 2: Important Points for Making Learning Tests (Murphey, 1994)
Additional things to think about (added 2019):
-
11.
Can students learn powerful social skills while testing like ‘asking’ or scaffolding and even friend-making?
-
12.
Can students self-evaluate themselves at least partially to give teachers an idea of what they think of themselves and strengthen their abilities to self-evaluate as they will be doing for the rest of their lives?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murphey, T. (2019). Innovating with the ‘The Collaborative Social’ in Japan. In: Reinders, H., Ryan, S., Nakamura, S. (eds) Innovation in Language Teaching and Learning. New Language Learning and Teaching Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12567-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12567-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12566-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12567-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)