Skip to main content

Refugee Mobility: Evidence from Phone Data in Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Guide to Mobile Data Analytics in Refugee Scenarios

Abstract

Our research report employs the D4R data and combines it with several other sources to study one of the multiple aspects of integration of refugees, namely the mobility of refugees across provinces in Turkey. In particular, we employ a standard gravity model to empirically estimate a series of determinants of refugee movements. These include the standard determinants such as province characteristics, distances across provinces, levels of income, network effects as well as some refugee-specific determinants such as the presence of refugee camps and the intensity of phone call interaction among refugees. Importantly, we explore the effect of certain categories of news events, notably protests, violence, and asylum grants. Considering news as an indicator of policy implemented at the provincial level, we gain a better understanding as to how policy can facilitate refugee mobility and thus enhance integration. To benchmark our findings, we estimate the same model for the mobility of individuals with a non-refugee status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This strand of the literature builds upon advancements over the last two decades on the use of new technologies such as remote sensing, geographical information systems, and global positioning systems to study mobility patterns in nonemergency contexts [8].

  2. 2.

    Reference [3] detailed the derivation of the random utility maximization model of migration providing micro-foundations to the empirical specification of the gravity model.

  3. 3.

    Under Sect. 22.5, we construct a stricter mobility measure, i.e., we replicate our analysis with a frequency filter of 20 calls.

  4. 4.

    The number of observations results from pairing each province with another province, given the bilateral nature of mobility. We do so for every month of the year 2017. We miss information on night-light for the month of June.

  5. 5.

    It is worthwhile keeping in mind that the number of calls is based on the universe of calls from dataset 1 from [23], whereas our mobility variable is computed using the sample provided from the third dataset.

  6. 6.

    it is also reassuring as to the fact that light density is a good proxy for income per capita at the province level.

  7. 7.

    Complete result tables are available from the authors of this report upon request.

References

  1. Beaman AL (2012) Social networks and the dynamics of labour market outcomes: evidence from refugees resettled in the US. Rev Econ Stud 79:128–161

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Beine M, Docquier F, Ozden C (2011) Diasporas. J Dev Econ 95:30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beine M, Bertoli S, Moraga JFH (2016) A practitioners’ guide to gravity models of international migration. World Econ 39(4):496–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blumenstock J, Eagle N, Fafchamps M (2016) Airtime transfers and mobile communications: evidence in the aftermath of natural disasters. J Dev Econ 120:157–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bose PS (2013) Building sustainable communities: immigrants and mobility in Vermont. Res Transp Bus Manag 7:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.03.006, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539513000278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bose PS (2014) Refugees in Vermont: mobility and acculturation in a new immigrant destination. J Transp Geogr 36:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crozet M (2004) Do migrants follow market potentials? an estimation of a new economic geography model. J Econ Geogr 4(1):439–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deville P, Linard C, Martin S, Gilbert M, Stevens FR, Gaughan AE, Blondel VD, Tatem AJ (2014) Dynamic population mapping using mobile phone data. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(45):15888–15893. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408439111, http://www.pnas.org/content/111/45/15888.full.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia AJ, Pindoliay DK, Lopiano KK, Tatemzz AJ (2015) Modeling internal migration flows in sub-Saharan Africa using census microdata. Migr Stud 3(1):89–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerner DJ, Abu-Jabr R, Schrodt PA, Yilmaz O (2002) Conflict and mediation event observations (CAMEO): a new event data framework for the analysis of foreign policy interactions. Paper presented at the international studies association of foreign policy interactions

    Google Scholar 

  11. Godøy A (2017) Local labor markets and earnings of refugee immigrants. Empir Econ 52(1):31–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-015-1065-1, https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/empeco/v52y2017i1d10.1007_s00181-016-1067-7.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Greyling T (2016) The expected well-being of urban refugees and asylum-seekers in Johannesburg. S Afr J Econ Manag Sci (SAJEMS) 19:232–248

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grönqvist H, Johansson P, Niknami S (2012) Income inequality and health: lessons from a refugee residential assignment program. Working paper series 2012:11, IFAU-institute for evaluation of labour market and education policy. https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/ifauwp/2012_011.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grogger J, Hanson GH (2011) Income maximization and the selection and sorting of international migrants. J Dev Econ 95(1):42–57. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/deveco/v95y2011i1p42-57.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Henderson JV, Storeygard A, Weil DN (2012) Measuring economic growth from outer space. Am Econ Rev 102(2):994–1028. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.2.994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Henderson V, Storeygard A, Weil D (2011) A bright idea for measuring economic growth. Am Econ Rev 101:194–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayda AM (2010) International migration: a panel data analysis of the determinants of bilateralflows. J Popul Econ 23(4):1249–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mills K (2012) Under the radar: impact of policies of localism on substance misuse services for refugee and asylum seeking communities. Int Soc Work 55:662–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Munshi K (2003) Networks in the modern economy: Mexican migrants in the US labor market. Q J Econ 118:549–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ravenstein EG (1985) The laws of migration. J R Stat Soc 48(2):167–235

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ravenstein EG (1989) The laws of migration-second paper. J R Stat Soc 52(2):241–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roy AD (1951) Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxf Econ Pap 3(2):135–146. https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v3y1951i2p135-146..html

  23. Salah A, Pentland A, Lepri B, Letouzé E, Vinck P, de Montjoye YA, Dong X, Daǧdelen z (2018) Data for refugees: the D4R challenge on mobility of Syrian refugees in Turkey. arXiv:1807.00523

  24. Silva JS, Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev Econ Stat 88(4):641–658. https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v88y2006i4p641-658.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Silva JS, Tenreyro S (2011) Further simulation evidence on the performance of the Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator. Econ Lett 112(2):220–222. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v112y2011i2p220-222.html

  26. Steele L, Lemieux-Charles L, Clark JP, Glazier RH (2002) The impact of policy changes on the health of recent immigrants and refugees in the inner city: a qualitative study of service providers’ perspectives. Can J Public Health Rev Can de Santé Publique 93(2):118–122

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vincenty T (1975) Direct and inverse solutions of geodesics on the ellipsoid with application of nested equations. Surv Rev 23:88–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wesolowski A, Eagle N, Tatem AJ, Smith DL, Noor AM, Snow RW, Buckee CO (2012) Quantifying the impact of human mobility on malaria. Science 338:267–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ziersch A, Walsh M, Due C, Duivesteyn E (2017) Exploring the relationship between housing and health for refugees and asylum seekers in South Australia: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(9):1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091036, http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/9/1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rana Cömertpay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beine, M., Bertinelli, L., Cömertpay, R., Litina, A., Maystadt, JF., Zou, B. (2019). Refugee Mobility: Evidence from Phone Data in Turkey. In: Salah, A., Pentland, A., Lepri, B., Letouzé, E. (eds) Guide to Mobile Data Analytics in Refugee Scenarios. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12554-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12554-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12553-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12554-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics