Skip to main content

Parenting, Upbringing, and Educational Philosophy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophical Presentations of Raising Children

Abstract

This chapter sets out our intention to articulate a specifically pedagogical understanding of upbringing. To lay the way for what follows, in which we put forward what we call an affirmative account of upbringing, we provide an overview of the rendering of upbringing in the current discourse of parenting. Drawing on an illustrative example, we do so specifically in relation to the phenomena of psychologisation, the positioning of parents as in need of education, and how particular behaviours are seen to evidence (correct) child development. This is then contrasted by an account of upbringing as an intergenerational relationship, drawing on the Continental educational philosophical tradition, represented here by figures such as Schleiermacher, Mollenhauer, and Arendt. Drawing on Wittgenstein and Cavell, we set out why the account we articulate here is expressed in terms of the grammar of upbringing, before relating this more specifically to the use of film in our investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This critical literature is growing rapidly, in line with the surge of literature and policy interventions aimed at parents. We cannot do justice to the extent and detail of this literature here, but indicative key works include: Furedi (2008), Furedi and Bristow (2008), Lee et al. (2014), Faircloth et al. (2013), MacVarish (2016), Richter and Andresen (2012), Hens et al. (2017), De Vos (2012), Cigman (2018), Edwards et al. (2017), Hendrick (2016), Ramaekers and Suissa (2012), Daly (2013), Van den Berge (2017), and Knijn and Hopman (2015). The work of these authors as well as other research forms part of the background against which we are writing. See also Ramaekers (2018) and ‘Living ancestors’ in Laboratory for Education and Society (2018) for a more elaborated account for how issues surrounding the parent–child relationship and upbringing , in particular, have recently been taken up in philosophy of education .

  2. 2.

    For an account of the post-critical approach to educational philosophy, see Hodgson et al. (2017, 2018).

  3. 3.

    Cf. O. Burkeman, https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/jan/16/baby-advice-books-industry-attachment-parenting.

  4. 4.

    It is interesting to note the huge increase in the number of peer-reviewed articles addressing parenting in one way or another over the last few decades. Web of Science, e.g., shows an increase over four decades (1978–1987; 1988–1997; 1998–2007; 2008–2017) from 185, over 573, over 1467, to 4475 articles. (Search conducted 2018–02–20; (TI = parenting) AND LANGUAGE: (English) AND DOCUMENT TYPES: (Article); Indexes = SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI.)

  5. 5.

    In Dutch the four G’s refer to: gedachten (thoughts), gevoelens (feelings ), gedrag (behavior), and gebeurtenis (event).

  6. 6.

    The blogs ‘Slummy Mummy’ and ‘Hurrah for Gin’ are two examples.

  7. 7.

    For further critical philosophical analysis of positive psychology and its use in education , see, e.g., Nussbaum (2012) and Suissa (2008). For a further philosophical critique of the impact of neuroscience in the social sciences and the humanities, see De Vos and Pluth (2016), and of the neurologisation of education , see De Vos (2015). See also Vandenbroeck (2017) for a critical analysis of neuroscience in early childhood education . For a critical sociological analysis of ‘neuroparenting’, see Macvarish (2016).

  8. 8.

    The countless articles entitled, ‘The Secret to …’ happy children , smart children, etc. attest to this. The ‘secret’ is generally scientifically validated claims for the causal relationship between parental behaviour and learning outcomes. See e.g. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-secret-to-raising-smart-kids1/ or https://www.parents.com/toddlers-preschoolers/development/fear/raising-happy-children/.

  9. 9.

    See the UK Department for Education report ‘Developing character skills in schools’ https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/634710/Developing_Character_skills-synthesis_report.pdf. ‘Resilience ’, ‘grit’, and ‘growth mindset’ are traits that have gained particular attention , popularised in the work of, among others, Angela Lee Duckworth and Carol Dweck.

  10. 10.

    See Ramaekers (2018) for a clarification of these concepts.

  11. 11.

    See Ramaekers and Suissa (2012), specifically Chapter 5, for a more detailed account.

References

  • Apple, R. (2006). Perfect motherhood: Science and childrearing in America. New York: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (2006). Between past and future. New York: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, M.-C., Gauchet, M., and Ottavi, D. (2008). Conditions de l’éducation. Paris: Stock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (2008). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1979). The claim of reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1990). Conditions handsome and unhandsome: The constitution of Emersonian perfectionism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1996). Declining decline. In S. Mulhall (Ed.), The Cavell reader (pp. 321–352). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigman, R. (2018). Cherishing and the good life of learning: Ethics, education, upbringing. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crary, J. (2013). 24/7. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstedt, M., and Fejes, A. (2014). Family Makeover: Coaching, Confession and Parental Responsibility. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 22, 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (2013). Parenting support: Another gender-related policy illusion in Europe? Women’s Studies International Forum, 41, 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, J. (2011). Psychologisering in tijden van globalisering: een kritische analyse van psychologie en psychologisering. Leuven: Acco.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, J. (2012). Psychologisation in times of globalisation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, J. (2015). Deneurologizing education? From psychologisation to neurologisation and back. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 34, 279–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, J, and Pluth, E. (Eds.). (2016). Neuroscience and critique: Exploring the limits of the neuropsychological turn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., Gillies, V., and Horsley, N. (2017). Challenging the politics of early intervention: Who’s ‘saving’ children and why. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faircloth, C., and Lee, E. (2010). Introduction: Changing parenting culture. Sociological Research Online, 15(4). http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.5153/sro.2249?journalCode=sroa.

  • Faircloth, C., Hoffman, D., and Layne, L. (2013). Parenting in global perspective: Negotiating ideologies of kinship, self and politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falomi, M. (2009). Cavell on the ethical point of the Investigations. In V. A. Munz, K. Puhl, and J. Wang (Eds.), Papers from the 32nd International Wittgenstein Symposia in Kirchberg am Wechsel. http://wittgensteinrepository.org/agora-alws/rt/printerFriendly/2812/3348.

  • Furedi, F. (2008). Paranoid parenting. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, F., and Bristow, J. (2008). Licensed to hug. Civitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, E. (2002). Stanley Cavell: Skepticism, subjectivity, and the ordinary. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, H. (2016). Narcissistic parenting in an insecure world: A history of parenting culture 1920s to present. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hens, K., Cutas, D., and Horstkötter, D. (2017). Parental responsibility in the context of neuroscience and genetics. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, N., Vlieghe, J., and Zamojski, P. (2017). Manifesto for a post-critical pedagogy. New York: Punctum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, N., Vlieghe, J., and Zamojski, P. (2018). Education and the love for the world: Articulating a post-critical educational philosophy. Foro de Educación, 16(24), 7–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.576.

  • Knijn, T., and Hopman, M. (2015). Parenting support in the Dutch ‘participation society’. Social Policy and Society, 14, 645–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laboratory for Education and Society. (2018). Family situation. In Sketching a place for education in times of learning. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., Bristow, J., Faircloth, C., and MacVarish, J. (2014). Parenting culture studies. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacVarish, J. (2016). Neuroparenting: The expert invasion of family life. Basingtoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masschelein, J., and Simons, M. (2013). In defence of the school: A public issue. Leuven: Education, Culture & Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollenhauer, K. (2014). Forgotten connections: On culture and upbringing (N. Friesen, trans.). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noens, P. (2017). Family ‘matters’: Re-‘taking’ upbringing in a culture of parenting. Unpublished PhD dissertation, KU Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noens, P., and Ramaekers, S. (2014). The family as a “gathering”: How the life of an object “makes” a family. International Journal of Child, Youth, and Family Studies, 5, 722–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2012). Who is the happy warrior? Philosophy, happiness research, and public policy. International Review of Economics, 59, 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. S. (2015 [1959]). Authority, responsibility, and education (Revised edition). Norwich: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaekers, S. (2018). Childrearing, parenting, upbringing: Philosophy of education and the experience of raising a child. In P. Smeyers, et al. (Eds.), International handbook of philosophy of education, Part II (pp. 995–1012). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaekers, S., and Suissa, J. (2012). The claims of parenting: Reasons, responsibility, and society. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, M., and Andresen, S. (Eds.). (2012). The politicization of parenthood: Shifting private and public responsibilities in education and child rearing. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, N., and Standish. P. (Eds.). (2011). Stanley Cavell and the education of grownups. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savicky, B. (2017). Wittgenstein’s investigations: Awakening the imagination. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, M., and Masschelein, J. (2008). From schools to learning environments: The dark side of being exceptional. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42, 687–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedts, G. (2008). Parenting and the art of being a parent. In P. Smeyers and M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: The educationalization of social problems. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2010). Total parenting. Educational Theory, 60, 357–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2010). Taking care of youth and the generations (S. Barker, trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suissa, J. (2008). Lessons from a new science? On teaching happiness in schools. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42, 575–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoomes, D. T. (1989). Opvoeding als opdracht: Over Friedrich Schleiermachers opvoedingsfilosofie. Kampen: Kok.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroeck, M. (2017). Constructions of neuroscience in early childhood education. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vansieleghem, N. (2010). The residual parent to come: On the need for parental expertise and advice. Educational Theory, 60, 341–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berge, L. (2017). Parenting support revisited: Retrieving an ethics of hermeneutics. A philosophical investigation inspired by the viewpoints of Heidegger, Wittgenstein and Taylor. Unpublished PhD dissertation, KU Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen (Philosophical investigations) (G. E. M. Anscombe, trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naomi Hodgson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hodgson, N., Ramaekers, S. (2019). Parenting, Upbringing, and Educational Philosophy. In: Philosophical Presentations of Raising Children. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12540-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12540-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12539-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12540-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics