Craft-Through-Relatedness; Relatedness-Through-Craft



This chapter will look at the way in which the everyday practice of the craft is located within the everyday life of the household; this is owing to the fact that historically the studio or the place of production, and the place of residence were not separate. The practice of craft is an integral site through which relations between kin are not only constructed, but also performed. The physical process of making traces the structural and relational hierarchies that constitute the household. Alongside, the collective vessel of the household becomes a potent means for providing the practice with contexts for dialogue, exchange and ‘growth’. This attempt to look at the ways in which craft practices and kinship practices participate in each other’s narratives creates the grounds for critically formulating ideas about the personhood, gender and inheritance.


  1. Bell, Diane, Pat Caplan, and Wazir-Jahan Begum Karim (eds.). 1993. Gendered Fields: Women, Men, and Ethnography. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Birla, Ritu. 2013. Maine (and Weber) Against the Grain: Towards a Postcolonial Genealogy of the Corporate Person. Journal of Law and Society 40 (1): 92–114.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, Judith. 1988. Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal 40 (4): 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, Judith. 2005. Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carsten, Janet. 1995. The Substance of Kinship and the Heat of the Hearth: Feeding, Personhood, and Relatedness Among Malays in Pulau Langkawi. American Ethnologist 2 (22): 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, Eugene. 1980. The Wood-Carvers of Hong Kong: Craft Production in the World Capitalist Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  7. Eyferth, Jacob. 2010. Craft Knowledge at the Interface of Written and Oral Cultures. East Asian Science and Technology Studies 4 (2): 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Goody, Jack. 1996. The East in the West. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hage, Ghassan. 2015. Alter-politics: Critical Anthropology and the Radical Imagination. Melbourne, VIC: Melbourne University Press. Google Scholar
  11. Heidegger, Martin. 2002. Origin of the Work of Art. In Off the Beaten Track, ed. Julian Young and Kenneth Haynes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  12. Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Ingold, Tim. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leonard, Karen Isaksen. 2011. Family Firms in Hyderabad: Gujarati, Goswami, and Marwari Patterns of Adoption, Marriage, and Inheritance. In Comparative Studies in Society and History 53 (4): 827–854.Google Scholar
  15. Luke, Nancy, Kaivan Munshi, and Mark Rosenzweig. 2004. Marriage, Networks, and Jobs in Third World Cities. Journal of European Economic Association 2 (2/3): 437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marchand, Trevor (ed.). 2010. Making Knowledge: Explorations of the Indissoluble Relations Between Mind, Body and Environment. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Maskeill, Michelle. 1999. Embroidering the Past: Phulkari Textiles and Gendered Work as ‘Tradition’ and ‘Heritage’ in Colonial and Contemporary Punjab. The Journal of Asian Studies 58 (2): 361–388. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moeran, Brian. 1984. Lost Innocence: Folk Craft Potters of Onta. Japan: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Murray, Marjorie. 2009. How Madrid Creates Individuals. In Anthropology and the Individual: A Material Culture Perspective, ed. D. Miller. New York: Berg. Google Scholar
  20. Narayan, Kiran. 2012. Alive in the Writing: Crafting Ethnography in the Company of Chekhov. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Olesen, Bodil Birkeboek. 2009. Making Things Come Out: Design, Originality and the Individual in a Bogolan Artisan Community. In Anthropology and the Individual: A Material Culture Perspective, ed. Daniel Miller. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  22. Portisch, Anna Odland. 2010. The Craft of Skilful Learning: Kazakh Women’s Everyday Craft Practices in Western Mongolia. In Making Knowledge: Explorations of the Indissoluble Relations Between Mind, Body and Environment, ed. Trevor Marchand. Oxford: Willey-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Ramanujan, A.K. 1989. Where Mirrors are Windows: Towards an Anthology of Reflections. History of Religions 28 (3): 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ratto, Matt. 2011. Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life. The Information Society: An International Journal 27 (4): 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ratto, Matt, and Megan Boler. 2014. DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roy, Tirthankar. 1999. Traditional Industry in the Economy of Colonial India. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sahlins, Marshall. 2011. What Kinship Is (Part One). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17: 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sennett, Richard. 2008. The Craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Shulman, David. 2001. The Wisdom of Poets: Studies in Tamil, Telugu, and Sanskrit. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  30. Singh, J.P. 2003. Nuclearization of Household and Family in Urban India. Sociological Bulletin 52 (1): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trawick, Margaret. 1990. Notes on Love in a Tamil Family. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  32. Udall, Sharyn R. 2003. Frida’s Kahlo’s Mexican Body: History, Identity, and Artistic Aspiration. Woman’s Art Journal 24 (2): 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Venkatesan, Soumhya. 2009. Craft Matters: Artisans, Development and the Indian Nation. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
  34. Warren, Carol A.B., and Jennifer Kay Hackney. 2000. Gender Issues in Ethnography. In Qualitative Research Methods, vol. 9. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Wilkinson-Weber, Clare M. 1999. Embroidering Lives: Women’s Work and Skill in the Lucknow Embroidery Industry. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wilkinson-Weber, Clare M. 2004. Women, Work and the Imagination of Craft in South Asia. Contemporary South Asia 13 (3): 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood, W. Warner. 2000. Flexible Production, Households, and Fieldwork: Multisited Zapotec Weavers in the Era of Late Capitalism. Ethnology 39 (2): 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Liberal ArtsIndian Institute of TechnologyHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations