Skip to main content

An Introduction to Structural Equation Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Structural Equation Models

Abstract

Early twentieth century research into genetic pathways initiated a revolution on hybrid crops, industrial farming, and eugenics and initially motivated the work on structural equation models. Geneticist and statistician Sewall Wright’s seminal work in path analysis laid the groundwork for the Chicago and Scandinavian Schools of structural equation modeling. Though rooted in the natural sciences, structural equation models rose to prominence through their utility for determining relationships and structures of unobserved, latent constructs in the social sciences. Advances in computing in the 1970s gave the increasingly complex structural equation model methodologies the necessary capabilities to handle larger and larger datasets. Automation drove the move from the pairwise Pearsonian correlations of path analysis, to structures of canonical correlations in partial least squares path analysis, and finally to the full covariance structure methods of the Chicago and Scandinavian Schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, I. Elaine, and Christopher A. Seaman. 2007. “Likert Scales and Data Analyses.” Quality Progress 40 (7): 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, D.G., and P. Royston. 2000. “What Do We Mean by Validating a Prognostic Model?” Statistics in Medicine 19 (4): 453–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T.W. 2005. “Origins of the Limited Information Maximum Likelihood and Two-Stage Least Squares Estimators.” Journal of Econometrics 127 (1): 1–16.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.C., and D.W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.” Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Theodore W., and Herman Rubin. 1949. “Estimation of the Parameters of a Single Equation in a Complete System of Stochastic Equations.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 20 (1): 46–63.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1950. “The Asymptotic Properties of Estimates of the Parameters of a Single Equation in a Complete System of Stochastic Equations.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (4): 570–582.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T.W., N. Kunitomo, and Y. Matsushita. 2010. “On the Asymptotic Optimality of the Liml Estimator with Possibly Many Instruments.” Journal of Econometrics 157 (2): 191–204.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, Richard P., and Paul R. Warshaw. 1990. “Trying to Consume.” Journal of Consumer Research 17 (2): 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, D., C. Higgins, and R. Thompson. 1995. “The Partial Least Squares (Pls) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration.” Technology Studies 2 (2): 285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmann, Robert L. 1957. “A Generalized Classical Method of Linear Estimation of Coefficients in a Structural Equation.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 25 (1): 77–83.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, William Thomas, and Robert Mason Hauser. 1977. “Structural Equation Models.” Annual Review of Sociology 3 (1): 137–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Michael W., and Robert Cudeck. 1989. “Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 24 (4): 445–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” Sociological Methods & Research 21 (2): 230–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” Sage Focus Editions 154: 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W.W. 1998. “Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling.” MIS Quarterly 22 (1): vii–xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W.W., and P.R. Newsted. 1999. “Structural Equation Modeling Analysis with Small Samples Using Partial Least Squares.” Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research 2: 307–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christ, Carl F. 1994. “The Cowles Commission’s Contributions to Econometrics at Chicago, 1939–1955.” Journal of Economic Literature 32 (1): 30–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, William G., Frederick Mosteller, and John W. Tukey. 1954. “Principles of Sampling.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 49 (265): 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowles, A. 1933. “Can Stock Market Forecasters Forecast?” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1 (3): 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Fred D., Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw. 1989. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models.” Management Science 35 (8): 982–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. “Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22 (14): 1111–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhrymes, Phoebus J. 1972. Distributed Lags: A Survey. Report. Los Angeles: UCLA Department of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. Econometrics. Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dhrymes, Phoebus J., E. Philip Howrey, Saul H. Hymans, Jan Kmenta, Edward E. Leamer, Richard E. Quandt, James B. Ramsey, Harold T. Shapiro, and Victor Zarnowitz. 1972. “Criteria for Evaluation of Econometric Models. Book Section.” In Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 1, Number 3, 291–325. Cambridge: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farebrother, R.W. 1999. Fitting Linear Relationships: A History of the Calculus of Observations 1750–1900. New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes, and D. Larker. 1981. “Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, John. 2006. Teacher’s Corner: Structural Equation Modeling with the SEM Package in R. Structural Equation Modeling 13 (3): 465–486.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, David A. 1987. “As Others See Us: A Case Study in Path Analysis.” Journal of Educational Statistics 12 (2): 101–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, Robert M. 1972. “Disaggregating a Social-Psychological Model of Educational Attainment.” Social Science Research 1 (2): 159–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, Robert M., and Arthur S. Goldberger. 1971. “The Treatment of Unobservable Variables in Path Analysis.” Sociological Methodology 3: 81–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Bruce M. 1979. “Posterior Moments of the Number of Species in a Finite Population and the Posterior Probability of Finding a New Species.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (367): 668–673.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. “Bayesian Nonparametric Prediction and Statistical Inference.” In Bayesian Analysis in Statistics and Econometrics, 43–94. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, Harold. 1933. “Analysis of a Complex of Statistical Variables into Principal Components.” Journal of Educational Psychology 24 (6): 417.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1936. “Relations Between Two Sets of Variates.” Biometrika 28 (3/4): 321–377.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G. 1970. “A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System.” ETS Research Bulletin Series 1970 (2): i–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. “Testing Structural Equation Models.” Sage Focus Editions 154: 294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G., and Dag Sörbom. 1982. “Recent Developments in Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Marketing Research 19 (4): 404–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G., and Marielle Van Thillo. 1972. “LISREL: A General Computer Program for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System Involving Multiple Indicators of Unmeasured Variables.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G., Dag Sorbom, and Jay Magidson. 1979. “Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models.”

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kailath, Thomas. 1967. “The Divergence and Bhattacharyya Distance Measures in Signal Selection.” IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology 15 (1): 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, Henry F. 1960. “The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1): 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1951. “Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities.” Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation 13: 33–37.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmöller, Jan-Bernd. 1988. “The PLS Program System: Latent Variables Path Analysis with Partial Least Squares Estimation.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 23 (1): 125–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, Robert E. 1992. “On Efficiency and Distribution.” Economic Journal 102(411): 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydtin, H., G Lohmöller, R. Lohmöller, H. Schmitz, and I. Walter. 1980. “Hemodynamic Studies on Adalat in Healthy Volunteers and in Patients.” Conference Proceedings. In 2nd International AdalatⓇSymposium, 112–123. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, John J. 1988. “Dynamic but Structural Equation Modeling of Repeated Measures Data.” In Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, 561–614. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, John J., and David Epstein. 1987. “Latent Growth Curves Within Developmental Structural Equation Models.” Child Development 58 (1): 110–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monecke, Armin, and Friedrich Leisch. 2012. “SemPLS: Structural Equation Modeling Using Partial Least Squares.” Journal of Statistical Software 48 (3): 1–32. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i03/

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargan, John D. 1958. “The Estimation of Economic Relationships Using Instrumental Variables.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 26: 393–415.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, Henri. 1980. System-Wide Explorations in International Economics, Input-Output Analysis, and Marketing Research. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, Henri, and John C.G. Boot. 1962. “The Final Form of Econometric Equation Systems.” Revue de L’Institut International de Statistique 30: 136–152.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, Louis Leon. 1935. The Vectors of Mind: Multiple-Factor Analysis for the Isolation of Primary Traits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Malcolm E., and Charles D. Stevens. 1959. “The Regression Analysis of Causal Paths.” Biometrics 15 (2): 236–258.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Werts, Charles E., Karl G. Jöreskog, and Robert L. Linn. 1972. “A Multitrait-Multimethod Model for Studying Growth.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 32 (3): 655–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werts, Charles E., Robert L. Linn, and Karl G. Jöreskog. 1974. “Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 34 (1): 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westland, J. Christopher. 2010. “Lower Bounds on Sample Size in Structural Equation Modeling.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 9 (6): 476–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H. 1966. “Estimation of Principal Components and Related Models by Iterative Least Squares.” Multivariate Analysis 1: 391–420.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. “Causal Flows with Latent Variables: Partings of the Ways in the Light of Nipals Modelling.” European Economic Review 5 (1): 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Sewall. 1920. The Relative Importance of Heredity and Environment in Determining the Piebald Pattern of Guinea-Pigs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 6 (6): 320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Sewall. 1921. “Correlation and Causation.” Journal of Agricultural Research 20 (7): 557–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1934. “The Method of Path Coefficients.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 5 (3): 161–215.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1960. “Path Coefficients and Path Regressions: Alternative or Complementary Concepts?” Biometrics 16 (2): 189–202.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A. 1962. “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 57: 348–368.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, Arnold, and Henri Theil. 1962. “Three-Stage Least Squares: Simultaneous Estimation of Simultaneous Equations.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 30: 54–78.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Westland, J.C. (2019). An Introduction to Structural Equation Models. In: Structural Equation Models. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12508-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics