Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The New Ideal Worker

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 2582 Accesses

Abstract

In the 70s, Coser (1974) defined the Greedy Institutions as those institutions who asked their members for an “exclusive and undivided loyalty”. These institutions assumed that the “ideal worker” was the one who devoted long hours to their jobs with no family interference (Williams 2000). In some sense, this image of “ideal worker” still exists, but empirical evidence seems to suggest that far from being positive for the organizations, having old “ideal workers” may have a negative impact on the twenty-first century organizations (Reid 2015; Rudman and Mescher 2013; Stone and Hernandez 2013; Williams et al. 2013). Moreover, recent technological, social and demographic changes have reshaped the way people work and the way families organize themselves (Jacobs and Gerson 2001; Presser 2003). In a situation like that, where more employees ask for a real work-family balance/integration, it is timely and relevant to examine the “new ideal worker”, and to understand how companies adapt to this new situation. Can we define a (new) ideal worker? If yes, are there cultural differences? Do companies offer new programs and policies for the (new) ideal worker? What role does technology play? The first goal of this edited volume is to answer these intriguing questions regarding the new ideal worker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1974). Greedy institutions; patterns of undivided commitment. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2011). How mothers and fathers share childcare: A cross-national time-use comparison. American Sociological Review, 76(6), 834–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411427673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer. (2015). Gender equality. Special Eurobarometer 428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. A., & Gerson, K. (2001). Overworked individuals or overworked families? Explaining trends in work, leisure, and family time. Work and Occupations, 28(1), 40–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, L., & Malami, M. (1999). Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces, 78(1), 235–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. B. (2003). Working in a 24/7 economy. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, E. (2015). Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organization Science, 26(4), 997–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2013). Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma? Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 322–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P., & Hernandez, L. A. (2013). The all-or-nothing workplace: Flexibility stigma and “opting out” among professional-managerial women. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. C. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. C., Blair-Loy, M., & Berdahl, J. L. (2013). Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Before we finish, we wish to express our absolute thankfulness to the members of the ICWF Board, Ellen Gallinsky, Ellen Kossek, Tim Hall, Brad Harrington, and Susan Lewis, for their advice. Sincere thanks also go to all the scholars that participated in our ICWF conferences. A special word of appreciation is owed to all the ICWF staff who helped to organize the conference and this collection. We would like to thank most sincerely all the reviewers who with their constructive comments have elevated the quality of this collection. Finally, thanks to Springer, specially to Rocio Torregrosa, for her enthusiasm, interest and caring disposition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mireia las Heras Maestro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

las Heras Maestro, M., Chinchilla Albiol, N., Grau Grau, M. (2020). Introduction. In: las Heras Maestro, M., Chinchilla Albiol, N., Grau Grau, M. (eds) The New Ideal Worker. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12477-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics