Skip to main content

Increasing the Adequacy of Management Decision Making for Choosing Intermediaries in Supply Chains

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 68))

Abstract

To date, a diverse array of expert assessments for quantitative (tangible) and qualitative (intangible) objects based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been accumulated in various fields of knowledge. The systematization and analysis of the collected data made it possible to put forward the hypothesis that some of the indicators (the eigenvalue of the matrix, the consistency index, and the ration of consistency) can be considered in the form of aggregates of random variables representing an intellectual product and reflecting features of human thinking. The systematization and statistical processing of the results obtained by experts on the basis of the AHP showed that the distribution functions of the values of expert estimates for the consistency indices significantly differ from the similar functions of the generated matrices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blair, A., Nachtmann, R., Saaty, T., Whitaker, R.: Forecasting the resurgence of the US economy in 2001: an expert judgment approach. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 36, 77–91 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blair, A., Mandelker, G., Saaty, T., Whitaker, R.: Forecasting the resurgence of the U.S. economy in 2010: an expert judgment approach. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 44, 114–121 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lukinskiy, V.S., Lukinskiy, V.V.: Analysis of the logistics intermediaries choice methods in the supply chains. Transp. Telecommun. 16(4), 288–295 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/ttj-2015-0026

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lukinskiy, V., Lukinskiy, V.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): prospects for application in supply chain management. In: Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv, I., Prentkovskis, O. (eds.) Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, RelStat 2017. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 36. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Niemira, M., Saaty, T.: An analytic network process model for financial-crisis forecasting. Int. J. Forecast. 20, 573–587 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ozdemir, M., Saaty, T.: The unknown in decision making. What to do about it. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 174, 349–359 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saaty, T., Vargas, L.: Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: Bayes theorem and the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Oper. Res. 46(4), 491–502 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saaty, T.: Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 145, 85–91 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saaty, T., Ozdemir, M.: Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Math. Comput. Model. 38, 233–244 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saaty, T., Vargas, L., Dellmann, K.: The allocation of intangible resources: the Analytic Hierarchy Process and linear programming. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 37, 169–184 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saaty, T.: There is no mathematical validity for using fuzzy number crunching in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 15(4), 457–464 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saaty, T.: Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 168, 557–570 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saaty, T., Shang, J.: Group decision-making: head-count versus intensity of preference. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 41, 22–37 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saaty, T., Tran, L.: On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Math. Comput. Model. 46, 962–975 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saaty, T.: Neurons the decision makers, Part I: the firing function of a single neuron. Neural Netw. 86, 102–114 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Taha, H.: Operations Research: An Introduction, 9th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Basile, O., Persia, L., Usami, D.: A methodology to assess pedestrian crossing safety. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2, 129–137 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Beria, P., Maltese, I., Mariotti, I.: Multicriteria versus cost benefit analysis: a comparative perspective in the assessment of sustainable mobility. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 4, 137–152 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cancela, J., Fico, G., Waldmeyer, M.: Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to understand the most important factors to design and evaluate a telehealth system for Parkinson’s disease. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 15(Suppl 3), S7 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dulange, S.R., Pundir, A.K., Ganapathy, L.: Prioritization of factors impacting on performance of power looms using AHP. J. Ind. Eng. Int. 10, 217–227 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gogas, M., Papoutsis, K., Nathanail, E.: Optimization of decision-making in port logistics terminals: using Analytic Hierarchy Process for the case of port of Thessaloniki. Transp. Telecommun. 15(4), 255–268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2014-0022

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hamidy, N., Alipur, H., Nasab, S., Yazdani, A., Shojaei, S.: Spatial evaluation of appropriate areas to collect runoff using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Geographical Information System (GIS). Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2, 172 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kabashkin, I., Lučina, J.: Development of the model of decision support for alternative choice in the transportation transit system. Transp. Telecommun. 16(1), 61–72 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/ttj-2015-0007

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kopytov, E., Abramov, D.: Multiple-criteria choice of transportation alternatives in freight transport system for different types of cargo. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference: Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication (RelStat 2013), 16–19 October, Riga, Latvia, pp. 180–187 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kopytov, E., Urbach, A., Labendik, V.: Comparative multi-criteria assessment of nano-coating technologies. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference: Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication (RelStat 2013), 16–19 October, Riga, Latvia, pp. 207–216 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maskeliūnaitė, L., Sivilevičius, H., Podvezko, V.: Research on the quality of passenger transportation by railway. Transport 24(2), 100–112 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.100-112

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rossi, R., Gastaldi, M., Gecchele, G.: Comparison of fuzzy-based and AHP methods in sustainability evaluation: a case of traffic pollution-reducing policies. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 5, 11–26 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Site, P., Filippi, F.: Weighting methods in multi-attribute assessment of transport projects. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 1, 199–206 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wiethoff, M., Brookhuis, K., Waard, D., Marchau, V., Walta, L., Wenzel, G., Brucker, K., Macharis, K.: A methodology for improving road safety by novel infrastructural and in vehicle technology combinations. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 4, 67–77 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytical Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Weibull, W.: Fatigue Testing and Analysis of Results. Pergamon Press, Oxford, London (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Saaty, T.L.: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valery Lukinskiy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lukinskiy, V., Lukinskiy, V., Bazhina, D. (2019). Increasing the Adequacy of Management Decision Making for Choosing Intermediaries in Supply Chains. In: Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv (Jackiva), I., Prentkovskis, O. (eds) Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication. RelStat 2018. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 68. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12450-2_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12450-2_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12449-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12450-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics