Advertisement

Critical Understanding of DSM’s Film World

  • Alberto BaraccoEmail author
Chapter
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter represents the last phase of the hermeneutic process, which provides a critical reconsideration of the interpretation and the philosophical thought that the film world expresses. The abstract nature of Brakhage’s film and the plurivocity of its images might seem to expose the interpreter to the risk of forcing interpretation and adapting it to whatever philosophical concept and argument. The film world is uncertain and indefinite—it asks questions rather than giving definitive answers. Dog Star Man’s pure, precognitive images are traces, in the Derridian sense; they are not simply a mirroring of external reality, but rather give rise to perceptions, impressions, and visions. Critical understanding of the film world leads us to consider it as an expression of a post-modern philosophy, which rejects the logocentric metaphysics of presence and through its visual traces reveals an original fertility of meaning.

Keywords

Mythopoeia Theopoetics Film amateur Logocentric metaphysics 

References

  1. Brakhage, Stan. 1982 [1971]. In Defence of Amateur. In Brakhage Scrapbook: Collected Writings 1964–1980, ed. Robert A. Haller, 162–168. New York: Documentext.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2017. Metaphors on Vision, ed. Adams Sitney. New York: Anthology Film Archives. Originally published in Film Culture (1963).Google Scholar
  3. Camper, Fred. 2002. Brakhage’s Contradictions. Chicago Review 47/48 (Winter, 2001–Spring, 2002): 69–96.Google Scholar
  4. Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1978. Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Diaries Notes and Sketches (also known as Walden). 1969. Directed by Jonas Mekas. Film.Google Scholar
  7. Dog Star Man. 1964. Directed by Stan Brakhage. Film.Google Scholar
  8. Frampton, Daniel. 2006. Filmosophy. London: Wallflower Press.Google Scholar
  9. James, David E. 1989. Allegories of Cinema: American Film in the Sixties. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Magrini, James Michael. 2013. The Philosophical Act of Seeing with One’s Own Eyes: The Silent Films of Stan Brakhage. Film-Philosophy 17 (1): 424–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Peterson, James. 1996. Is a Cognitive Approach to the Avant-Garde Cinema Perverse? In Post Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, ed. David Bordwell and Noël Carroll, 108–129. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  12. Potter, Brett David. 2013. Visionary Film and the “World’s Body”: Stan Brakhage and Theopoetic. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Religion, Baltimore, 23 November.Google Scholar
  13. Rosenbaum, Jonathan. 1983. Film: The Front Line. Denver: Arden Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sitney, Adams P. 2002. Visionary Film: The American Avant-Garde 1943–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2008. Eyes Upside Down: Visionary Filmmakers and the Heritage of Emerson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Sterritt, David. 1999. The Films of Jean-Luc Godard: Seeing the Invisible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Vattimo, Gianni, and Pier Aldo Rovatti (eds.). 1983. Il pensiero debole. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  18. Wees, William C. 1992. Light Moving in Time: Studies in the Visual Aesthetics of Avant-Garde Film. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. White, Jerry. 2013. Two Bicycles: The Work of Jean-Luc Godard and Anne-Marie Miéville. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Willemen, Paul. 1973. Eisenstein/Brakhage. Studio International: Journal of Modern Art 185 (956) (June): 252–253.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations