Abstract
The previous chapter cogently demonstrates that the ability to recognize predators is widespread among birds, involving not only distinguishing predators from the harmless animals but also mutually distinguishing individual groups and predator species from one another. This leads to a question what cues birds use for recognition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ash J (1970) Observations on a decreasing population of red-backed shrikes. Br Birds 63:185–205
Aust U, Huber L (2001) The role of item- and category-specific information in the discrimination of people versus nonpeople images by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 29:107–119. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192820
Aust U, Huber L (2002) Target-defining features in a “people-present/people-absent” discrimination task by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 30:165–176. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192918
Beránková J, Veselý P, Sýkorová J, Fuchs R (2014) The role of key features in predator recognition by untrained birds. Anim Cogn 17:963–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0728-1
Beránková J, Veselý P, Fuchs R (2015) The role of body size in predator recognition by untrained birds. Behav Process 120:128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.015
Carter J, Lyons NJ, Cole HL, Goldsmith AR (2008) Subtle cues of predation risk: starlings respond to a predator’s direction of eye-gaze. Proc Biol Sci 275:1709–1715. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0095
Curio E (1975) The functional organization of anti-predator behaviour in the pied flycatcher: a study of avian visual perception. Anim Behav 23:1–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(75)90056-1
Duckworth JW (1991) Responses of breeding reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus to mounts of sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus, cuckoo Cuculus canorus and jay Garrulus glandarius. Ibis 133:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1991.tb04812.x
Edwards G, Hosking E, Smith S (1950) Reactions of some passerine birds to a stuffed cuckoo. II. A detailed study of the Willow Warbler. Br Birds 43:144–150
Evans C, Macedonia J, Marler P (1993b) Effects of apparent size and speed on the response of chickens, Gallus gallus, to computer-generated simulations of aerial predators. Anim Behav 46:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1993.1156
Gill SA, Neudorf DL, Sealy SG (1997a) Host responses to cowbirds near the nest: cues for recognition. Anim Behav 53:1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0362
Gill SA, Grieef PM, Staib LM, Sealy SG (1997b) Does nest defence deter or facilitate cowbird parasitism? A test of the nesting-cue hypothesis. Ethology 103:56–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00007.x
Gluckman TL, Mundy NI (2013) Cuckoos in raptors’ clothing: barred plumage illuminates a fundamental principle of Batesian mimicry. Anim Behav 86:1165–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.020
Goethe F (1937) Beobachtungen und Untersuchungen zur Bioiogie der Silbermöwe (Larus a. argentatus Pontopp.) auf der Vogelinsel Memmertsand. J Ornithol 85:1–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01905490
Goethe F (1940) Beobachtungen und Versuche über angeborene Schreckreaktionen junger Auerhühner. Z Tierpsychol 4:165–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1940.tb00621.x
Klump GM, Curio E (1983) Reactions of blue tits Parus caeruleus to hawk models of different sizes. Bird Behav 4:78–81
Krätzig H (1940) Untersuchungen zur Lebensweise des Moorschneehuhns (Lagopus l. lagopus L.) während der Jugendentwicklung. J Ornithol 88:139–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01670363
Lack D (1943) The life of the robin. Whiterby, London
Langmore NE, Feeney WE, Crowe-Riddell J, Luan H, Louwrens KM, Cockburn A (2012) Learned recognition of brood parasitic cuckoos in the superb fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus. Behav Ecol 23:798–805. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars033
Liang W, Møller AP (2015) Hawk mimicry in cuckoos and anti-parasitic aggressive behavior of barn swallows in Denmark and China. J Avian Biol 46:216–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.00515
Lorenz K (1937a) The companion in the bird’s world. Auk 54:245–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/4078077
Lorenz K (1937b) Über die Bildung des Instinktbegriffes. Naturwissenschaften 25:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01492648
Lorenz K (1939) Vergleichende verhaltensforschung. Verh Deut Z 12:69–102
Lyon BE, Gilbert GS (2013) Rarely parasitized and unparasitized species mob and alarm call to cuckoos: implications for sparrowhawk mimicry by brood parasitic cuckoos. Wilson J Ornithol 125:627–630. https://doi.org/10.1676/12-162.1
Marr D, Nishihara HK (1978) Representation and recognition of spatial-organization of 3-dimensional shapes. Proc Biol Sci 200:269–294. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1978.0020
Němec M, Fuchs R (2014) Nest defense of the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio against five corvid species. Acta Ethol 17:149–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-013-0175-z
Němec M, Součková T, Fuchs R (unpublished) The red-backed shrike Lanius collurio recognize the predator due local, not due global features
Nice MM, Ter Pelkwyk J (1941) Enemy recognition by the song sparrow. Auk 58:195–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/4079104
Palleroni A, Hauser M, Marler P (2005) Do responses of galliform birds vary adaptively with predator size? Anim Cogn 8:200–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-004-0250-y
Scaife M (1976) The response to eye-like shapes by birds. I. The effect of context: a predator and a strange bird. Anim Behav 24:195–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80115-7
Schleidt W, Shalter MD, Moura-Neto H (2011) The hawk/goose story: the classical ethological experiments of Lorenz and Tinbergen, revisited. J Comp Psychol 125:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022068
Smith JM, Graves HB (1978) Some factors influencing mobbing behaviour in barn swallows Hirundo rustica. Behav Biol 23:355–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6773(78)91379-2
Strnad M, Němec M, Veselý P, Fuchs R (2012) Red-backed Shrikes (Lanius collurio) adjust the mobbing intensity, but not mobbing frequency, by assessing the potential threat to themselves from different predators. Ornis Fennica 89:206–215
Thorogood R, Davies NB (2012) Cuckoos combat socially transmitted defenses of Reed Warbler hosts with a plumage polymorphism. Science 337:578–580. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220759
Thorogood R, Davies NB (2013) Hawk mimicry and the evolution of polymorphic cuckoos. Chin Birds 4:39–50. https://doi.org/10.5122/cbirds.2013.0002
Tinbergen N (1948) Social releasers and the experimental method required for their study. Wilson Bull 60:6–51
Tinbergen N (1951) The study of instinct. Clarendon Press, New York
Trnka A, Grim T (2013) Color plumage polymorphism and predator mimicry in brood parasites. Front Zool 10:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-10-25
Trnka A, Prokop P (2012) The effectiveness of hawk mimicry in protecting cuckoos from aggressive hosts. Anim Behav 83:263–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.036
Trnka A, Prokop P, Grim T (2012) Uncovering dangerous cheats: how do avian hosts recognize adult brood parasites. PLoS One 7:e37445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037445
Tvardíková K, Fuchs R (2011) Do birds behave according to dynamic risk assessment theory? A feeder experiment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:727–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1075-0
Tvardíková K, Fuchs R (2012) Tits recognize the potential dangers of predators and harmless birds in feeder experiments. J Ethol 30:157–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-011-0310-0
Veselý P, Buršíková M, Fuchs R (2016) Birds at the winter feeder do not recognize an artificially coloured predator. Ethology 122:937–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12565
Watve M, Thakar J, Kale A, Puntambekar S, Shaikh I, Vaze K, Jog M, Paranjape S (2002) Bee-eaters (Merops orientalis) respond to what a predator can see. Anim Cogn 5:253–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-002-0155-6
Welbergen JA, Davies NB (2008) Reed warblers discriminate cuckoos from sparrowhawks with graded alarm signals that attract mates and neighbours. Anim Behav 76:811–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.03.020
Welbergen JA, Davies NB (2011) A parasite in wolf’s clothing: hawk mimicry reduces mobbing of cuckoos by hosts. Behav Ecol 22:574–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fuchs, R., Veselý, P., Nácarová, J. (2019). Tools Used for Predator Recognition. In: Predator Recognition in Birds. SpringerBriefs in Animal Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12404-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12404-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12402-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12404-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)