Skip to main content

Spider Configurations for Models with Discrete Iwan Elements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 912 Accesses

Abstract

Lacayo et al. (Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 118: 133–157, 2019) recently proposed a fast model updating approach for finite element models that include Iwan models to represent mechanical joints. The joints are defined by using RBE3 averaging constraints or RBAR rigid constraints to tie the contact surface nodes to a single node on each side, and these nodes are then connected with discrete Iwan elements to capture tangential frictional forces that contribute to the nonlinear behavior of the mechanical interfaces between bolted joints. Linear spring elements are used in the remaining directions to capture the joint stiffness. The finite element model is reduced using a Hurty/Craig-Bampton approach such that the physical interface nodes are preserved, and the Quasi-Static Modal Analysis approach is used to quickly predict the effective natural frequency and damping ratio as a function of vibration amplitude for each mode of interest. Model updating is then used to iteratively update the model such that it reproduces the correct natural frequency and damping at each amplitude level of interest. In this paper, Lacayo’s updating approach is applied to the S4 Beam (Singh et al., IMAC XXXVI, 2018) giving special attention to the size and type of the multi-point constraints used to connect the structures, and their effect on the linear and nonlinear modal characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Fixed interface modes are normal modes obtained by fixing the interface between two subcomponents.

  2. 2.

    Constraint modes are obtained by deflecting a single mode by a unit displacement while fixing the other DOF.

  3. 3.

    If all sliders have the same friction coefficient then the slip force is defined by the normal force for each slider.

References

  1. Abaqus analysis user’s guide. Simulia, (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jewell, E., Allen, M.S., Lacayo, R.: Predicting damping of a cantilever beam with a bolted joint using quasi-static modal analysis. In: Presented at the Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conference & 13th International Conference on Multibody Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Control IDETC/MSNDC 2017, (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Segalman, D.J.: A four-parameter Iwan model for lap-type joints. J. Appl. Mech. 72(5), 752–760 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Feldman, M.: Non-linear system vibration analysis using Hilbert transform--I. Free vibration analysis method ‘Freevib’. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 8(2), 119–127 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Festjens, H., Chevallier, G., Dion, J.-L.: A numerical quasi-static method for the identification of frictional dissipation in bolted joints. In: Presented at the ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2012, August 12, 2012–August 12, 2012, 2012, vol. 1, pp. 353–358

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lacayo, R.M., Allen, M.S.: Updating structural models containing nonlinear Iwan joints using quasi-static modal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2017, (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Singh, A. et al.: Experimental characterization of a new benchmark structure for prediction of damping nonlinearity. In: Presented at the 36th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC XXXVI), Orlando, Florida (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuether, R.J., Coffin, P.B., Brink, A.R.: On Hurty/Craig-Bampton substructuring with interface reduction on contacting surfaces. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Cleveland, Ohio (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Craig, R.R.J., Bampton, M.C.C.: Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis. AIAA J. 6(7), 1313–1319 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Krattiger, D., et al.: Interface reduction for Hurty/Craig-Bampton substructured models: review and improvement. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 114, 579–603 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sierra/SD – Theory manual. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Segalman, D.J., et al.: Handbook on Dynamics of Jointed Structures, vol. 87185. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deaner, B.: Modeling the Nonlinear Damping of Jointed Structures Using Modal Models. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fronk, M. et al.: Inverse methods for characterization of contact areas in mechanical systems. In: Presented at the 36th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC XXXVI) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Sandia National Laboratories. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA-0003525. SAND2018-11919 C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew S. Allen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Full Interface RBAR Springs for all Models

Appendix: Full Interface RBAR Springs for all Models

In this case study, the full interface RBAR case linear spring stiffnesses were used to attach the four interfaces for the other three models. The tables below depict their results with Table 4.7 showing the linear frequencies and Table 4.8 showing the percent errors.

Table 4.7 Linear frequencies for each model using the spring stiffnesses of the full interface RBAR case
Table 4.8 Percent errors for the modes for each model using the spring stiffnesses of the full interface RBAR case

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Singh, A., Wall, M., Allen, M.S., Kuether, R.J. (2020). Spider Configurations for Models with Discrete Iwan Elements. In: Kerschen, G., Brake, M., Renson, L. (eds) Nonlinear Structures and Systems, Volume 1. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12391-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12391-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12390-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12391-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics