Advertisement

Human Superposition Allows for Large-Scale Quantum Computing

  • Bruce LevinsonEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 70)

Abstract

Quantum computing is not confined to qubits in carefully controlled environments, it also takes place on a human scale. This paper will show that the process by which the Inuit elders make food security predictions on behalf of their people—and the instructions for how to test those predictions—constitute a quantum computing exercise. The elders’ food security predictions require calculations about environmental systems and their complex interactions based on (1) a millennium or more of the Inuit people’s experiences and (2) a continually evolving understanding of these experiences. When the elders engage in their decision-making process, they achieve superposition—that is to say that the elders, collectively, are able to achieve a unified perspective that encompasses the sum total unique understanding of the world of each elder. Inuit Indigenous Knowledge, which has produced robust and reliable food security predictions for centuries, is consistent with quantum mechanics. Conclusion: Inuit Indigenous Knowledge is a scientific system comparable to—and deserving of acceptance by scientists and governments as being of equal stature to—“Western” science.

Keywords

Environmental Food security Inuit people Indigenous knowledge Quantum computing 

References

  1. 1.
    Daniel, R., Behe, C.: Co-production of knowledge: an Inuit Indigenous Knowledge perspective. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2017, abstract #C13H-04 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruggles, C.: Indigenous astronomies and progress in modern astronomy. In: Norris, R., Ruggles, C. (eds.) Accelerating the Rate of Astronomical Discovery (Special Session 5, IAU General Assembly, Aug 11–14, 2009, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Proceedings of Science, PoS(sps5) (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roberts, J.: Laws, counterfactuals, fine-tuning and measurement. Collected in Laws of Nature: Their Nature and Probability, Perimeter Institute (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raff, J., et al.: Mitochondrial diversity of Iñupiat people from the Alaskan North Slope provides evidence for the origins of the Paleo- and Neo-Eskimo peoples. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 157(4), 603–614 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inuit Circumpolar Council-Alaska, “Alaskan Inuit Food Security Conceptual Framework: How to Assess the Arctic From an Inuit Perspective. Technical Report.” Anchorage, AK, (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caves, C.M., Fuchs, C.A., Schack, R.: Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities. Phys. Rev. A 65, 022305 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fuchs, C.A.: “On Participatory Realism” v3, arXiv:1601.04360v3 [quant-ph] to appear in “Information & Interaction: Eddington, Wheeler, and the Limits of Knowledge”, edited by Durham, I.T., Rickles, D. (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Standish, R.K.: The importance of the observer in science. In: Proceedings the Two Cultures: Re-considering the Division Between the Sciences and Humanities, UNSW (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Riedlinger, D., Berkes, F.: Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Record 37, 315–328 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Regulatory EffectivenessWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations