Advertisement

The Influence of Media Types on Students’ Learning Performance in a Role Playing Game on English Vocabulary Learning

  • Yuting Li
  • Jing LengEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 70)

Abstract

The application of learning resources to education game not only enriches the content of education game, but also facilitates learners’ personalized autonomous learning and satisfies the cognitive preference of learners with different foundation and learning resource preferences. The paper intends to identify the effects of the presentation of learning resources on students’ the learning performance in a role playing game on English vocabulary learning. This study first tries to find out which learning resource media type was preferred by the second-year college students in the learning game. Then it examines the influence of different types of learning resources media on learners’ learning outcome. Finally, the relationship between students’ learning resource preferences and their chosen learning resources and media is analyzed. Results from the experimental study have shown that participants who choose text media perform better on vocabulary test on the whole than those who use other media. However, those who prefer visual learning material are proved to have a good mastery of difficult vocabularies. The study could provide a reference for the collocation of learning resources media in the digital game design on vocabulary learning.

Keywords

Learning resource media Learning performance Vocabulary learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Kolb, D.A.: Experiential learning experience as a source of learning and development. Coll. Teach. 1, 16–17 (1984)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mayer, R.E., Gallini, J.: When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? J. Educ. Psychol. 83, 715–726 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mayer, R.E., Sims, V.K.: For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 86, 389–401 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mousavi, S.Y., Low, R., Sweller, J.: Reducing cognitive load and visual presentation mode. J. Educ. Psychol. 87, 319–334 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. J. Educ. Psychol. 90, 312–320 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tindall-Ford, Chandler, & Sweller (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., Cate, C.: The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognit. Instr. 21(4), 325–360 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., Ecclestone, K.: Learning resource preferences and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Centre, London (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khacharem, A., Zoudji, B., Ripoll, H.: Effect of presentation format and expertise on attacking-drill memorization in soccer. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 25(2), 234–248 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Felder, R.M., Silverman, L.K.: Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Eng. Educ. 78(7), 674–681 (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reid, J.M.: The learning style preferences of ESL students. Tesol Q. 21(1), 87–111 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caple, J., Martin, P.: Reflections of two pragmatists: a critique of honey and mumford′s learning resource preferences. Ind. Commer. Train. 26(1), 16–20 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sweller, J., Ayres, P., Kalyuga, S.: Cognitive load theory. Springer, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hmoudova, D.E.: The impact of learning style dimensions on computer-based key language competences testing. Proc Soc Behav Sci 82(1), 411–416 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., Bjork, R.: Learning resource preferences concepts and evidence. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 9(3), 105–119 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Information TechnologyEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations