Abstract
Although the CAD parameters allow to update easily the geometrical model, the numerical models updating into Finite Elements (FE) software with different mesh result to be often heavy, due to the necessity both to create new mesh and to make usually time consuming and complex CAE calculations for updating the loading conditions. The aim of the present research is to devise a reliable methodology and at the same time to reduce computational burden in the shape optimization studies of mechanical components. In particular, an integrated Multibody (MB) and Mesh-Morphing (MM) approach was developed to perform shape optimization, in order to reduce maximum tensions. Using the RBF Morph ACT Extension plugin implemented in the commercial solver FEM ANSYS® Mechanical vers. 18.2 along with the commercial MB software MSC ADAMS® vers. 2017, shape optimizations can be obtained in a very short time, by acting directly at the mesh so updating node positions and mesh elements geometry without bringing different geometrical models of the component into the FE environment. To validate the methodology, a crankshaft for a high performance Internal Combustion Engine (I.C.E.) was chosen, as case study, to optimize the fillet zones between web and pin.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cali’ M, Oliveri SM, Sequenzia G (2007) Geometric modeling and modal stress formulation for flexible multi-body dynamic analysis of crankshaft. In: 25th conference and exposition on structural dynamics, IMAC-XXV, Orlando, FL, United States
Mourelatos ZP (2001) A crankshaft system model for structural dynamic analysis of internal combustion engines. Comput Struct 79(20):2009–2027. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00119-5
Yar A, Bhatti AI, Ahmed Q (2018) First principle based control oriented model of a gasoline engine including multi-cylinder dynamics. Control Eng Pract 70:63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2017.09.020
Oliveri SM, Sequenzia G, Calì M (2009) Flexible multibody model of desmodromic timing system. Mech Based Des Struct Mach 37(1):15–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397730802552266
Gui C, Sun J, He Z, Li Z (2017) Systematical analysis method for the mechanical behaviors of crankshaft-bearing system. J Tribol 139(2):021702–021702-9. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033362
Wei L, Wei H, Du H, Duan S (2017) Three-dimensional vibration of the crankshaft of a large marine diesel engine under a mixed thermo-elastic-hydro-dynamic lubrication coupling between flexible crankshaft and engine block. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038457
He B, Zhou G, Hou S, Zeng L (2017) Virtual prototyping-based fatigue analysis and simulation of crankshaft. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9–12):2631–2650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8941-5
Witek L, Sikora M, Stachowicz F, Trzepiecinski T (2017) Stress and failure analysis of the crankshaft of diesel engine. Eng Fail Anal 82:703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.06.001
Dinh TQ, Marco J, Greenwood D, Harper L, Corrochano D (2017) Powertrain modelling for engine stop–start dynamics and control of micro/mild hybrid construction machines. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K: J Multi-body Dyn 231(3):439–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464419317709894
Ponti F, Ravaglioli V, De Cesare M (2016) Development of a methodology for engine performance investigation through double crankshaft speed measurement. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 138(10):102813–102813-6, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033066
Calì M, Oliveri SM, Sequenzia G, Fatuzzo G (2017) An effective model for the sliding contact forces in a multibody environment. In: Eynard B, Nigrelli V, Oliveri SM, Peris-Fajarnes G, Rizzuti S (2017) Advances on mechanics, design engineering and manufacturing. Springer International Publishing, pp 675–685. ISSN: 2195-4356
Ramnath BV, Elanchezhian C, Jeykrishnan J, Ragavendar R, Rakesh PK, Dhamodar JSM, Danasekar A (2018) Implementation of reverse engineering for crankshaft manufacturing industry. Mater Today: Proc 5(1):994–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.175
Staten ML, Owen SJ, Shontz SM, Salinger AG, Coffey TS (2011) A comparison of mesh morphing methods for 3D shape optimization. In: Proceedings of the 20th international meshing roundtable. Springer, pp 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24734-7_16
Vurputoor R, Mukherjee N, Cabello J, Hancock M (2008) A mesh morphing technique for geometrically dissimilar tessellated surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 16th international meshing roundtable. Springer, pp 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75103-8_18
Sigal IA, Hardisty MR, Whyne CM (2008) Mesh-morphing algorithms for specimen-specific finite element modeling. J Biomech 41(7):1381–1389
Shontz SM, Vavasis SA (2010) Analysis of and workarounds for element reversal for a finite element-based algorithm for warping triangular and tetrahedral meshes. BIT Numer Math 50(4):863–884
Shontz SM, Vavasis SA (2003) A mesh warping algorithm based on weighted Laplacian smoothing. In: Twelfth international meshing roundtable, Santa Fe, NM, pp 147–158
Stein K, Tezduyar T, Benney R (2003) Mesh moving techniques for fluid-structure interactions with large displacements. J Appl Mech 70(1):58–63
Buhmann MD (2004) Radial basis functions. Cambridge University Press
Biancolini ME (2017) Ridurre le concentrazioni di tensione con il mesh morphing. A&C. ANALISI E CALCOLO, ISSN, pp 1128–3874
Acknowledgements
The research work reported here was made possible by the use of the RBF Morph ACT Extension plugin given by the RBF Morph Srl company. For the technical collaboration and the provided data we thank Eng. Franco Cazzolato, Eng. Giovanni Maiorana and Eng. Gianni Lamonaca of FCA. Finally we thank for the FE simulation with RBF Morph ACT Extension the thesis student Daniele Musco.
Funding
The research presented in this paper is part of the AMELiE (Advanced framework for Manufacturing Engineering and product Lifecycle Enhancement) project funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (PON03PE_00206_1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Calì, M., Oliveri, S.M., Evangelos Biancolini, M., Sequenzia, G. (2019). An Integrated Approach for Shape Optimization with Mesh-Morphing. In: Cavas-Martínez, F., Eynard, B., Fernández Cañavate, F., Fernández-Pacheco, D., Morer , P., Nigrelli, V. (eds) Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing II. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12346-8_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12346-8_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12345-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12346-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)