Skip to main content

Rough Times Ahead for NATO

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Security and Defence in Europe

Abstract

There are three structural reasons that have not much to do with the person of Donald Trump that explain why NATO will have hard times to survive. First, alliances only make sense in times of war. Against all odds and against what Realists had predicted, NATO remained into existence after the Cold War. This is an anomaly in international politics that in all likelihood will end in the demise of NATO. Second, the major factor of change in international politics in general, according to Realists, is the shifting balance of power between the major powers in the world. These days, the most important shift is the rise of China and the relative decline of the US, especially economically. This change has implications for foreign policy. The odds are that China will become more assertive, first in the region and thereafter maybe globally. US foreign policy will probably become more isolationist, which has immediate repercussions for US allies. US allies - including NATO allies - will be left more on their own. Third, European defense integration does not stand still, on the contrary. It can become a serious alternative for NATO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Andrew Brubsinm American preacher, detained since 2016 on charges related to a failed coup against the President, was left back home on = ctobre 12, 2018.

References

  1. Billon-Galland A, Thompson A (2018) European strategic autonomy: stop talking, start planning, European defense policy brief of the European leadership network, May

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biscop S (2018) European defence: give PESCO a chance. Survival 60(3):161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman U (2018) Trump vs. NATO: it’s not just about the money, Defense One, 12 June

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gardner H (2014) From Berlin to Ukraine/Russia. In: NATO watch comment, 9 November. [online]. Available from: http://natowatch.org/node/1657. Accessed 9 Nov 2014

  5. Garfinkle A (1997) NATO enlargement, what’s the rush ? Nat Interest 46:105–106

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldgeier J (2010) The future of NATO. In: Council on foreign relations special report 10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon P, Daalder I (2018) Trump’s worst blow to NATO came at home. Defense one, 19 July

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jakobsen PV, Ringsmose J (2018) Victim of its own success: how NATO’s difficulties are caused by the absence of a unifying existential threat. JTS 16:38–58

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kamp K-H (1995) The folly of rapid NATO expansion. Foreign Policy 98:116–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kennan G (1997) A fateful error. New York Times, 5 February, p. A23

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klare M (1995) Rogue states and nuclear outlaws. Hill and Wang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kupchan C, Kupchan C (1991) Concerts, collective security, and the future of Europe. Int Secur 16(1):114–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kupchan C, Kupchan C (1995) The promise of collective security. Int Secur 20(1):52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lehne S, Grabbe H (2017) How Donald Trump could save EU foreign policy. Carnegie Europe, 12 January

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mandelbaum M (1995) Preserving the new peace. The case against NATO expansion. Foreign Aff 74(3):9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mearsheimer J (1990) Back to the future. Int Secur 15(1):5–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mearsheimer J (2014) Why the Ukraine crisis is the West’s fault. Foreign Aff 93(5):77–89

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nitze P (1998) Letter to senator Moynihan. Congressional Record 144, pt 5, 21–30 April

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peel M, Manson K, Khan M (2018). Pentagon fires warning shot to EU over NATO unity. The Financial Times, 15 February

    Google Scholar 

  20. Posen B (2014) Restraint. A new foundation for US grand strategy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rachman G (2017) Merkel, Trump and the end of the West. The Financial Times, 30 May

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rettman A (2017) Germany is black spot in NATO solidarity. EU observer, 23 May

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rupp R (2006) NATO after 9/11: an alliance in continuing decline. Palgrave/Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Shifrinson JR (2016) Deal or no Deal? The end of the cold war and U.S. offer to limit NATO expansion. Int Secur 40(4):7–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarotte ME (2014) A broken promise? Foreign Aff 93(5):90–97

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sauer T (2017) The origins of the Ukraine crisis and the need for collective security between Russia and the west. Global Pol 8(1):82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Traub J (2018) RIP the Trans-Atlantic alliance, 1945–2018. Foreign policy, 11 May

    Google Scholar 

  28. Valasek T (2017) The EU’s new defense pact: marginal gains, Carnegie Europe, 16 November

    Google Scholar 

  29. Walt S (1987) The origins of alliances. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walt S (1998) The ties that fray: why Europe and America are drifting apart. The National Interest, 1 December

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walt S (2015) Why Arming Kiev is a really, really bad idea. Foreign Policy, 9 February

    Google Scholar 

  32. Walt S (2018) NATO isn’t what you think it is. Foreign Policy, 26 July

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Sauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sauer, T. (2020). Rough Times Ahead for NATO. In: Ramírez, J.M., Biziewski, J. (eds) Security and Defence in Europe. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12293-5_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics