Skip to main content

Gatecrashing the Cambridge Tradition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wynne Godley
  • 190 Accesses

Abstract

Having shifted focus from short-term forecasts to longer-term analysis in his later Treasury years, Godley accepts an invitation from Kaldor to move to Cambridge as director of its Department of Applied Economics (DAE). He takes over and expands a group of externally funded researchers, set up by Keynes but long divided over the right empirical approach to developing his analysis. Godley sets up the Cambridge Economic Policy Group (CEPG), which within ten years is its largest unit, producing regular policy assessments which gain national publicity for their scathing verdicts on the likely consequences of Conservative and Labour policies through the 1970s. Francis Cripps, recruited to the Economics Faculty by Kaldor, crosses to the DAE to join the group, becoming an essential contributor of analysis and computer programming for the CEPG policy simulation model, which the DAE houses alongside a separate forecasting model run by the Growth Project under its former director Richard Stone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cairncross, A. (1998). Living with the Century. Fife: Iynx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eatwell, J., & Robinson, J. (1973). An Introduction to Modern Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Schwartz, A. (1963). A Monetary History of the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fright, M. (2016, July 13). Accounting for the impact of the DAE. Paper presented at Cambridge Journal of Economics 40th Anniversary conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, I., & Garnett, M. (1997). Whatever Happened to the Tories? The Conservative Party Since 1945. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godley, W. (1979). Britain’s chronic recession—Can anything be done? In W. Beckerman (Ed.), Slow Growth in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godley, W., & Cripps, F. (1974). The par model. In G. D. N. Worswick & F. Blackaby (Eds.), The Medium Term: Models of the British Economy. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godley, W. (1981, February 6). Catastrophic policies. Financial Times, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, C. A. E. (2014, March). Competition and credit control. LSE Financial Markets Group Special Paper 229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, G. (1998). The Cambridge contribution to economics. In S. Ormrod (Ed.), Cambridge Contributions (pp. 65–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, J. (1998). Empirical analysis as an underpinning to policy. In I. Begg & S. G. B. Henry (Eds.), Applied Economics and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. E., & Stone, R. G. (1944). National Income and Expenditure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, D. (2011, July 17). Troika’s claim that Ireland is doing fine is a load of Junk. Sunday Business Post (Cork).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moosa, I. A. (2017). Econometrics as a Con Art: Exposing the Limitations and Abuses of Econometrics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. (1978, June). The LCES—A historical outline. Kraus Bibliographical Bulletin, 26, 217–223 (New York: Krauss-Thompson Organisation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (2008, December). Better to be Rough and Relevant than to be Precise and Irrelevant: Reddaway’s Legacy to Economics (Working Paper 379). Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (1979, February 26). The contagious British disease. Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shipman, A. (2019). Gatecrashing the Cambridge Tradition. In: Wynne Godley. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12289-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12289-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12288-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12289-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics