Skip to main content

Carbon Footprint Accounting for General Goods—A Comparison

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 891 Accesses

Abstract

Carbon emissions are an actual topic in the European public discussion due to the climate objectives of the European Union and the countries in specific. Especially the traffic and the transport sector have been evaluated as polluters so that logistics service providers and forwarders are getting into the focus of their customers to provide a systemic approach in calculating the carbon footprint of their logistics services. In addition customers struggle to compare carbon footprints of several logistics service providers and forwarders, due to the lack of a common standard for calculating of carbon emissions. There are two existing approaches, which are getting in focus for the logistics companies if they have not outsourced the calculation or are using fee-based calculation software. On the one hand, there is the European standard EN 16258, which has been established in Europe to create more transparency and on the other hand there is the GLEC framework as a global approach which aims to create a global standardized procedure. Both standards allow different approaches for emission calculation which lead to totally different results of carbon emission. Due to that a comparable value for customers and stakeholder is not given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smart Freight Centre (2016) GLEC Framework for Logistics Emissions Methodologies. s.l.: Version 1.0. Available from www.smartfreightcentre.org

  2. CEN/TC 320 “Transport—Logistik und Dienstleistungen (2012) Methode zur Berechnung und Deklaration des Energieverbrauchs und der Treibhausgasemissioen bei Transportdienstleistungen (DIN EN 16258). Berlin: Beuth Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  3. DSLV (2015) Zahlen, Daten und Fakten aus Spedition und Logistik. Deutscher Speditions- und Logistikverband, Bonn, p 2015

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schmied M, Knörr W (2013) Berechnung von Treibhausgasemissionen in Spedition und Logistik gem. DIN EN 16258. Bonn: DSLV Deutscher Speditions- und Logistikverband

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kranke A, Schmied M, Schön AD (2011) CO2 Berechnung in der Logistik. Verlag Heinrich Vogel, München

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hülemeyer, D., Schoeder, D. (2019). Carbon Footprint Accounting for General Goods—A Comparison. In: Teuteberg, F., Hempel, M., Schebek, L. (eds) Progress in Life Cycle Assessment 2018. Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12266-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12266-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12265-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12266-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics