Advertisement

Smart Interactive Cities [SICs]: The Use of Computational Tools and Technologies [CTTs] as a Systemic Approach to Reduce Water and Energy Consumption in Urban Areas

  • Fodil FadliEmail author
  • Mahmoud AlSaeed
Chapter
Part of the S.M.A.R.T. Environments book series (SMARTE)

Abstract

The traditional thinking of cities as the compilation of their land, buildings and, infrastructure is no longer accurate to study their foundation components. Conventional urban planning is not sufficient anymore to solve city related issues. Moreover, there is an important need to integrate technology through its smart computational systems, to the City Information Modeling [CIM] concepts in order to solve those everlasting re-occurring issues. The design and development of a systemic approach in urban design processes is a necessity to face the various threats to our current and future world. Some of these major threats strongly tied up to reducing water and energy consumption rates, as well as designing and developing a smart interactive city that can maintain and sustain itself. Most importantly, this Smart Interactive C City [SIC] would also strengthen the connections between humans, machines and spaces.

The aim of this explorative innovative work is to enable us as designers, architects and planners, to design and develop our cities in a smart way. Cities will become a digital platform with infinite data floating in and out of their physical and metaphysical structures. This information comes from every element we use and we live with. These data need to be collected in one place that is accessible and usable by all users and stakeholders to enable the resolution of predicting future scenarios and managing existing issues. This can be enabled via the use and integration of the principles of City Information Modelling [CIM] and Computational Tools and Technologies [CTTs].

Keywords

Smart city City Information Modelling [CIM] Computational systems Urban design Technology Energy & water consumption reduction 

References

  1. AlSaaed, M., & Fadli, F. (2018). Computational technology applications in urban design processes; WE-ADAMS an integrated tool to smart energy/water management system.Google Scholar
  2. Barnsley, M. J., & Barr, S. L. (1996). Inferring urban land use from satellite sensor images using kernel-based spatial reclassification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62(8), 949–958.Google Scholar
  3. Batty, M. (1997). Cellular automata and urban form: a primer. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(2), 266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becerik-Gerber, B., & Kensek, K. (2009). Building information modeling in architecture, engineering, and construction: Emerging research directions and trends. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 136(3), 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beirão, J. N., Duarte, J. P., Montenegro, N., & Gil, J. (2009). Monitoring urban design through generative design support tools: a generative grammar for Praia. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the APDR Congress.Google Scholar
  6. Birx, G. W. (2005). BIM evokes revolutionary changes to architecture practice at Ayers/Saint/Gross. AIArchitect, 12, 1–7.Google Scholar
  7. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of urban technology, 18(2), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cocchia, A. (2014). Smart and digital city: A systematic literature review Smart city. Genoa: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Council, W. E. (2016). World energy resources. London: WECouncil.Google Scholar
  10. Dameri, R. P. (2017). Smart city definition, goals and performance smart city implementation (pp. 1–22). Springer.Google Scholar
  11. De Paula, R. (2013). City spaces and spaces for design. Interactions, 20(4).Google Scholar
  12. Despotakis, V. K., Giaoutzi, M., & Nijkamp, P. (1993). Dynamic GIS models for regional sustainable development Geographic Information Systems, Spatial Modelling and Policy Evaluation (pp. 235–261). Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Dohr, A., Modre-Opsrian, R., Drobics, M., Hayn, D., & Schreier, G. (2010). The internet of things for ambient assisted living. Paper presented at the Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), 2010 Seventh International Conference on.Google Scholar
  14. Eastman, C. (1975). The use of computers instead of drawings in building design. AIA Journal, 63(3), 46–50.Google Scholar
  15. Eastman, C., Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., & Sacks, R. (2011). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. USA & Canada John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  16. EIA (2011). Annual energy review (Reports). From Energy Information Admission. https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/index.php#consumption
  17. Emmitt, S. (2009). Architectural technology; Research & practice. England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Fadli, F., Sobhey, M., Asadi, R., & Elsarrag, E. (2014). Environmental impact assessment of new district developments. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 142, 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fadli, F., Barki, H., Boguslawski, P., & Mahdjoubi, L. (2015). 3D scene capture: A comprehensive review of techniques and tools for efficient Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) and Emergency Preparedness (EP) applications. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 149, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fadli, F., Kutty, N., Wang, Z., Zlatanova, S., Mahdjoubi, L., Boguslawski, P., & Zverovich, V. (2018). Extending indoor open street mapping environments to navigable 3D CITYGML building models: Emergency response assessment. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 42(4), 161–168.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M., Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault.Google Scholar
  22. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanović, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities: Ranking of european medium-sized cities. vienna, austria: Centre of regional science (srf), vienna university of technology. www. smart-cities. eu/download/smart cities final report pdfGoogle Scholar
  23. Goetz, M. (2013). Towards generating highly detailed 3D CityGML models from OpenStreetMap. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(5), 845–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Han, S.-Y., & Kim, T. J. (1989). Can expert systems help with planning? Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(3), 296–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., & Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for smarter cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54(4), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hendrickson, C., & Au, T. (1989). Project management for construction: Fundamental concepts for owners, engineers, architects, and builders. Chris Hendrickson.Google Scholar
  27. Hickman, L. A. (2001). Philosophical tools for technological culture: Putting pragmatism to work. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hoekstra, A. Y., & Chapagain, A. K. (2006). Water footprints of nations: Water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern Integrated assessment of water resources and global change (pp. 35–48). Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. IEA. (2016). Water Energy Nexuse- World Energy Outlook 2016. From International Energy Agency www.iea.org/t&c/
  31. Innis, R. E. (2003). The meanings of technology. Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 7(1), 34–40.Google Scholar
  32. Jadhav, N. Y. (2016). Green and smart buildings: Advanced technology options (Vol. 1). Puchong: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jin, D., & Lin, S. (2012). Advances in computer science and information engineering. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kahramaa. (2016a). General statistics report consumption Report (Water section). State of Qatar: Qatar General Electricity & Water Corporation.Google Scholar
  35. Kahramaa. (2016b). General Statistics report consumption report (Electrical Department). State of Qatar: Qatar General Electricity & Water Corporation.Google Scholar
  36. Kahramaa. (2017). Electricity & water statistics report. State of Qatar: Department of Planning and Quality Assurance.Google Scholar
  37. Kahramaa. (2018). State of Qatar annual electricity & water statistics report (production and consumption). State of Qatar: Department of Planning and Quality Assurance.Google Scholar
  38. Kunz, J., & Fischer, M. (2009). Virtual design and construction: Themes, case studies and implementation suggestions. Center for Integrated Facility Engineering (CIFE), Stanford University.Google Scholar
  39. Landis, J. D. (1995). Imagining land use futures: applying the California urban futures model. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(4), 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Longley, P., Higgs, G., & Martin, D. (1994). The predictive use of GIS to model property valuations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 8(2), 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. LREDC. (2015). Lusail City: Sustainability strategies, from http://www.lusail.com/the-project/sustainability/
  42. Maria, F. M. (2016). Deriving building information models from legacy paper drawings.Google Scholar
  43. McDuffie, H. T. (2006). BIM: Transforming a traditional practice model into technology-enabled integrated practice model. The Cornerstone, AIA.Google Scholar
  44. Moutinho, J. L. (2008). Building the information society in Portugal: lessons from the digital cities programm 1998–2000. Value-added partnering and innovation in a changing world, 215.Google Scholar
  45. Rooney, D. (1997). A contextualising, socio-technical definition of technology: learning from Ancient Greece and Foucault. Prometheus, 15(3), 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scharfenort, N. (2014). Off and running: Qatar brands for FIFA World Cup, and life beyond. Under Construction: Logics of Urbanism in the Gulf Region.Google Scholar
  47. Stewart, F. (1977). Technology and underdevelopment. Development Policy Review, 10(1), 92–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson, E. M., Greenhalgh, P., Muldoon-Smith, K., Charlton, J., & Dolník, M. (2016). Planners in the future city: Using city information modelling to support planners as market actors. Urban Planning, 1(1), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tok, E., Fatemah Al Mohammad, M., & Al Merekhi, M. (2015). Crafting smart cities in the gulf region: a comparison of Masdar and Lusail Handbook of Research on Digital Media and Creative Technologies (pp. 448–460). IGI Global.Google Scholar
  50. UN. (2016). The world’s cities in 2016 UN: Department of economic and social affairs, population division.Google Scholar
  51. Xu, X., Ding, L., Luo, H., & Ma, L. (2014). From building information modeling to city information modeling. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITCon), 19, 292–307.Google Scholar
  52. Yeh, A. G.-O. (1991). The development and applications of geographic information systems for urban and regional planning in the developing countries. International Journal of Geographical Information System, 5(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yeh, A. G.-O. (1999). Urban planning and GIS. Geographical information systems, 2(877–888), 1.Google Scholar
  54. Yeh, A. G.-O., & Chow, M. H. (1996). An integrated GIS and location-allocation approach to public facilities planning—An example of open space planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 20(4–5), 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, College of EngineeringQatar UniversityDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations