Advertisement

Understanding Consumer Demand for New Transport Technologies and Services, and Implications for the Future of Mobility

  • Akshay Vij
Chapter
Part of the S.M.A.R.T. Environments book series (SMARTE)

Abstract

The transport sector is witnessing unprecedented levels of disruption. Privately owned cars that operate on internal combustion engines have been the dominant modes of passenger transport for much of the last century. However, recent advances in transport technologies and services, such as the development of autonomous vehicles, the emergence of shared mobility services, and the commercialization of alternative fuel vehicle technologies, promise to revolutionise how humans travel. The implications are profound: some have predicted the end of private car dependent Western societies, others have portended greater suburbanization than has ever been observed before. If transport systems are to fulfil current and future needs of different subpopulations, and satisfy short and long-term societal objectives, it is imperative that we comprehend the many factors that shape individual behaviour. This chapter introduces the technologies and services most likely to disrupt prevailing practices in the transport sector. We review past studies that have examined current and future demand for these new technologies and services, and their likely short and long-term impacts on extant mobility patterns. We conclude with a summary of what these new technologies and services might mean for the future of mobility.

Keywords

Future mobility Autonomous vehicles Electric vehicles Shared mobility Travel behaviour 

References

  1. AECOM. (2016). Transport on demand: Accelerating Australian cities. An AECOM Brilliant Cities Report. Google Scholar
  2. Bansal, P., Kockelman, K. M., & Singh, A. (2016). Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, H., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2017a). Comparing car-sharing schemes in Switzerland: User groups and usage patterns. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 97, 17–29.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, H., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2017b). Modeling free-floating car-sharing use in Switzerland: A spatial regression and conditional logit approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 81, 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernard, Z. (2018). The bike-sharing economy is shaking up the transportation market worldwide. Business Insider Australia, published April 13, 2018.Google Scholar
  7. Buck, D., Buehler, R., Happ, P., Rawls, B., Chung, P., & Borecki, N. (2013). Are bikeshare users different from regular cyclists? A first look at short-term users, annual members, and area cyclists in the Washington, DC, region. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2387, 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burkhardt, J., & Millard-Ball, A. (2006). Who is attracted to carsharing? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1986, 98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casley, S., Jardim, A., & Quartulli, A. (2013). A study of public acceptance of autonomous cars. Worcester Polytechnic Institute.Google Scholar
  10. CEDA (Committee for Economic Development of Australia). (2015). Australia’s future workforce? July 2015.Google Scholar
  11. Cervero, R., Golub, A., & Nee, B. (2007). City CarShare: Longer-term travel demand and car ownership impacts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1992, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang, V., Chundury, P., & Chetty, M. (2017, May). Spiders in the sky: User perceptions of drones, privacy, and security. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 6765–6776). ACM.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen-Blankshtain, G., & Rotem-Mindali, O. (2016). Key research themes on ICT and sustainable urban mobility. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(1), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cortright, J. (2016). The price of autonomous cars: Why it matters. Retrieved from http://cityobservatory.org/price-of-autonomous-cars/
  15. Costain, C., Ardron, C., & Habib, K. N. (2012). Synopsis of users’ behaviour of a carsharing program: A case study in Toronto. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(3), 421–434.Google Scholar
  16. Corwin, S., Vitale, J., Kelly, E., & Cathles, E. (2014). The future of mobility: How transportation technology and social trends are creating a new business ecosystem. Deloitte.Google Scholar
  17. Cowling, K. (2014). Net effects of bicycle share programs on bike safety. American Journal of Public Health, 104(11), E6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daziano, R. A., Sarrias, M., & Leard, B. (2017). Are consumers willing to pay to let cars drive for them? Analyzing response to autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 78, 150–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Luca, S., & Di Pace, R. (2015). Modelling users’ behaviour in inter-urban carsharing program: A stated preference approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 71, 59–76.Google Scholar
  20. Deschamps, T. (2018). Car2Go to shutter Toronto operations; service presents different parking issues in Vancouver. The Canadian Press, published May 24, 2018.Google Scholar
  21. Dias, F. F., Lavieri, P. S., Garikapati, V. M., Astroza, S., Pendyala, R. M., & Bhat, C. R. (2017). A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services. Transportation, 44(6), 1307–1323.Google Scholar
  22. Dixon, T. (2018). Chinese electric vehicle subsidy changes in 2018 — The details. EV Obsession, published January 6, 2018.Google Scholar
  23. DoE (Department of Energy). (2014). The history of the electric car. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/articles/history-electric-car
  24. Duncan, M., Charness, N., Chapin, T., Horner, M., Stevens, L., Richard, A., Souders, D., Crute, J., Riemondy, A., & Morgan, D., 2015. Enhanced mobility for aging populations using automated vehicles (No. 035048).Google Scholar
  25. Efthymiou, D., & Antoniou, C. (2016). Modeling the propensity to join carsharing using hybrid choice models and mixed survey data. Transport Policy, 51, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Firnkorn, J., & Müller, M. (2015). Free-floating electric carsharing-fleets in smart cities: The dawning of a post-private car era in urban environments? Environmental Science & Policy, 45, 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fishman, E. (2016). Bikeshare: A review of recent literature. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 92–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fishman, E., Washington, S., Haworth, N., & Mazzei, A. (2014a). Barriers to bikesharing: An analysis from Melbourne and Brisbane. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fishman, E., Washington, S., & Haworth, N. (2014b). Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fishman, E., Washington, S., Haworth, N., & Watson, A. (2015). Factors influencing bike share membership: An analysis of Melbourne and Brisbane. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 71, 17–30.Google Scholar
  31. Fusheng, L. (2018). China has the most public EV charging stations worldwide. China Daily, published January 11, 2018.Google Scholar
  32. Global Market Insights, Inc. (2018). Car sharing market trends – Global 2018-24 industry size report.Google Scholar
  33. Goodman, A., & Cheshire, J. (2014). Inequalities in the London bicycle sharing system revisited: Impacts of extending the scheme to poorer areas but then doubling prices. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 272–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goodwin, P., & Van Dender, K. (2013). ‘Peak car’—Themes and issues. Transport Reviews, 33(3), 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Graves, J. M., Pless, B., Moore, L., Nathens, A. B., Hunte, G., & Rivara, F. P. (2014). Public bicycle share programs and head injuries. American Journal of Public Health, 104(8), e106–e111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Habib, K. M. N., Morency, C., Islam, M. T., & Grasset, V. (2012). Modelling users’ behaviour of a carsharing program: Application of a joint hazard and zero inflated dynamic ordered probability model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(2), 241–254.Google Scholar
  37. Haboucha, C. J., Ishaq, R., & Shiftan, Y. (2017). User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 78, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hao, M., & Yamamoto, T. (2017, October). Analysis on supply and demand of shared autonomous vehicles considering household vehicle ownership and shared use. In Intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), 2017 IEEE 20th international conference on (pp. 185–190). IEEE.Google Scholar
  39. Howard, D., & Dai, D. (2014). Public perceptions of self-driving cars: The case of Berkeley, California. In Transportation research board 93rd annual meeting (No. 14–4502).Google Scholar
  40. Hu, W. (2017). Uber, surging outside Manhattan, tops Taxis in New York City. The New York Times, published October 12, 2017.Google Scholar
  41. ITS Australia. (2018). Mobility as a Service in Australia: Customer insights and opportunities.Google Scholar
  42. Jackson, C. V. (2017). Enterprise CarShare is officially pulling out of most Chicago locations. Chicago Tribune, published June 28, 2017.Google Scholar
  43. JPI Urban Europe. (2017). Stimulating a transition to sustainable urban mobility.Google Scholar
  44. Kim, J., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2017). Satisfaction and uncertainty in car-sharing decisions: An integration of hybrid choice and random regret-based models. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95, 13–33.Google Scholar
  45. Knudsen, C., & Doyle, A. (2018). Norway powers ahead (electrically): Over half new car sales now electric or hybrid. Reuters, published January 3, 2018.Google Scholar
  46. Krueger, R., Rashidi, T. H., & Rose, J. M. (2016). Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 69, 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., & De Winter, J. C. F. (2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. LDA Consulting. (2013). 2013 capital bikeshare member survey report. Washington, DC: Commissioned by Capital Bikeshare.Google Scholar
  49. Le Vine, S., Lee-Gosselin, M., Sivakumar, A., & Polak, J. (2014). A new approach to predict the market and impacts of round-trip and point-to-point carsharing systems: Case study of London. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 32, 218–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lee, A. (2018). China’s electric car market is growing twice as fast as the US: Here’s why. South China Morning Post, published April 27, 2018.Google Scholar
  51. Liao, F., Molin, E., & van Wee, B. (2017). Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: A literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), 252–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lim, C. H., & Nair, T. (2017). How 3D printing could disrupt Asia’s manufacturing economies. The Conversation, published January 10, 2017.Google Scholar
  53. Manthey, N. (2018). Norway’s EV share at over 5 percent and rising. Electrive, published March 26, 2018.Google Scholar
  54. Martin, E., Shaheen, S., & Lidicker, J. (2010). Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings: Results from north American shared-use vehicle survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143, 150–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McDonald, N. C. (2015). Are millennials really the “go-nowhere” generation? Journal of the American Planning Association, 81(2), 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meddin, R., & DeMaio, P. (2018). The bike-sharing world map. Retrieved January 26, 2014, from http://www.bikesharingworld.com
  57. Menon, N., Pinjari, A. R., Zhang, Y., & Zou, L. (2016). Consumer perception and intended adoption of autonomous-vehicle technology: Findings from a university population survey. In Transportation research board 95th annual meeting (No. 16–5998).Google Scholar
  58. Mirani, L. (2015). Norway’s electric-car incentives were so good they had to be stopped. Quartz, published May 7, 2015.Google Scholar
  59. Musk, E. (2013). Hyperloop alpha. SpaceX. Google Scholar
  60. Nelson, E. (2017). Norway is planning to pull the plug on its wildly successful electric-car incentives. Quartz, published October 13, 2017.Google Scholar
  61. Payre, W., Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P. (2014). Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 252–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Phillip Boyle & Associates. (2016). The impact of car share services in Australia. International Car sharing association.Google Scholar
  63. Pymynts. (2016). Ride-sharing Kills LA’s Taxi Industry. 18 April 2018.Google Scholar
  64. Rayle, L., Dai, D., Chan, N., Cervero, R., & Shaheen, S. (2016). Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Policy, 45, 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rödel, C., Stadler, S., Meschtscherjakov, A., & Tscheligi, M. (2014, September). Towards autonomous cars: The effect of autonomy levels on acceptance and user experience. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (pp. 1–8). ACM.Google Scholar
  66. Roland Berger. (2018). Car-sharing in China: How to operate a successful business.Google Scholar
  67. Salomon, A., Kimbrough, G., & Bershteyn, A. (2014). The safety of public bicycle share programs in North America. American Journal of Public Health, 104(11), E4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schmöller, S., Weikl, S., Müller, J., & Bogenberger, K. (2015). Empirical analysis of free-floating carsharing usage: The Munich and Berlin case. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 56, 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014). A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia (No. UMTRI-2014-21).Google Scholar
  70. Scutt, D. (2018). Global electric vehicle sales are booming. Business Insider Australia, published January 22, 2018.Google Scholar
  71. Shaheen, S. A., & Cohen, A. P. (2013). Carsharing and personal vehicle services: Worldwide market developments and emerging trends. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., & Martin, E. (2013). Public bikesharing in North America: Early operator understanding and emerging trends. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2387, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., & Zohdy, I. (2017). Shared mobility resources: Helping to understand emerging shifts in transportation. Policy Briefs, 2017(18).Google Scholar
  74. Shaheen, S., Martin, E., & Bansal, A. (2018a). Peer-To-Peer (P2P) carsharing: Understanding early markets, social dynamics, and behavioral impacts.Google Scholar
  75. Shaheen, S., Totte, H., & Stocker, A. (2018b). Future of mobility white paper.Google Scholar
  76. Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., & Jaffee, M. (2018c). Innovative mobility: Carsharing outlook. eScholarship, University of California.Google Scholar
  77. Shoup, D. (2017). The high cost of free parking: Updated edition. Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Taylor, C. L., Hyde, D. J., & Barr, L. C. (2016). Hyperloop commercial feasibility analysis: High level overview (No. DOT-VNTSC-NASA-16-01). John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (US).Google Scholar
  79. Tchebotarev, E. (2017). With hundreds of millions of dollars burned, the dockless bike sharing market is imploding. Forbes, published December 16, 2017.Google Scholar
  80. Terdiman, D. (2017). A Startup’s plan to cut air freight costs in half with 777-size drones. Fast Company, published March 27, 2017.Google Scholar
  81. TfNSW (Transport for New South Wales). (2013). CBD and south east light rail project: Environmental impact statement.Google Scholar
  82. Vij, A., Gorripaty, S., & Walker, J. L. (2017). From trend spotting to trend’splaining: Understanding modal preference shifts in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95, 238–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vij, A., Ryan, S., Sampson, S., & Harris, S. (2018). The Australian market for on-demand transport.Google Scholar
  84. Wong, Y. Z., Hensher, D. A., & Mulley, C. (2017). Emerging transport technologies and the modal efficiency framework: A case for mobility as a service (MaaS).Google Scholar
  85. Woodcock, J., Tainio, M., Cheshire, J., O’Brien, O., & Goodman, A. (2014). Health effects of the London bicycle sharing system: Health impact modelling study. BMJ, 348, g425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yoon, T., Cherry, C. R., & Jones, L. R. (2017). One-way and round-trip carsharing: A stated preference experiment in Beijing. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 53, 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhu, W., Pang, Y., Wang, D., & Timmermans, H. (2013). Travel behavior change after the introduction of public bicycle systems: Case study in Minhang District, Shanghai (No. 13-0764).Google Scholar
  88. Zoepf, S. M., & Keith, D. R. (2016). User decision-making and technology choices in the US carsharing market. Transport Policy, 51, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akshay Vij
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for ChoiceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations