Understanding the Relationship Between Smart Cities and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: The Case of Sydney

  • D. CetindamarEmail author
  • T. Lammers
  • N. Sick
Part of the S.M.A.R.T. Environments book series (SMARTE)


Smart city literature is overdrawn with discussions on public services such as transportation while there is a need to broaden the analysis to understand the very rich dynamics of cities. In this chapter, the goal is to focus on the rise of technology-based entrepreneurs in cities which are creating emerging digital technologies. Cities have been a popular unit of analysis for technological development and economic activities due to their high dependency on immediate local context factors. Nowadays, the transformation of cities into “smart” has increased their role further – both for economic value and for technological growth. This paper aims to expand the smart city concept to an ecosystem approach where cities become hubs of digital technologies. By combining the previous literature on entrepreneurship and digital technologies within a particular urban context, this paper discusses how smart cities could be a solid base to build digital entrepreneurship ecosystems for sustainable, liveable and competitive cities. In particular, the paper provides a case study for Sydney by illustrating the interactions between smart cities and digital entrepreneurship ecosystems in practice. The chapter ends with a summary of findings and implications for both policy makers and digital entrepreneurs.


Digital technologies Entrepreneurship ecosystems Smart city Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem 


  1. 2thinknow Global Innovation Agency. (2017). Innovation cities index.
  2. Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Government. (2016). Smart cities plan.
  4. Australian Government. (2017a). The digital economy: Opening the conversation.
  5. Australian Government. (2017b). The national cities performance framework.
  6. Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M., & Rosenberg, M. (2014). How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: An industry 4.0 perspective. International Journal of Mechanical, Industrial Science and Engineering, 8(1), 37–44.Google Scholar
  7. Caragliu, A., Bo, C. D., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cetindamar, D., & Gunsel, A. (2012). Measuring the creativity of a City: A proposal and an application. European Planning Studies, 20(8), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chourabi, H. et al. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. Paper presented at the 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 4–7 January, Hawaii, the USA.Google Scholar
  10. City of Sydney. (2016). Digital strategy. City of Sydney, Sydney.
  11. Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dia, H. (2016). Who (or what) is behind the wheel? The regulatory challenges of driverless cars. The conversation.
  13. EasyParkGroup. (2017). Smart cities index.
  14. EY Sweeney. (2017). Digital Australia, state of the nation. Sydney: Ernst & Young Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Golembiewski, B., vom Stein, N., Sick, N., & Wiemhöfer, H.-D. (2015). Identifying trends in battery technologies with regard to electric mobility: Evidence from patenting activities along and across the battery value chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 800–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Groopman, J., Lieb, R., Owyang, J., & Szymanski, J. (2017). Three macrotrends impacting the journey to 2030. Kaleido insights.
  17. Hellwig, C. (2017). New perspectives on cyber security: The regulatory challenge. Global Risk Insights.
  18. Henderson, J. V. (1995). Not a funeral but a wake: Regional science in perspective. International Regional Science Review, 17(3), 333–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real Smart City please stand up? City, 12(3), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoover, E. M. (1975). An introduction to regional economics (2nd ed.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  21. Isenberg, D. J. (2011). Introducing the entrepreneurship ecosystem: Four defining characteristics. Forbes. Available at
  22. Jasperneite, J. (2012). Was hinter Begriffen wie Industrie 4.0 steckt. Computer Automation.
  23. Katz, B., & Wagner, J. (2014). The rise of innovation districts: A new geography of innovation in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Kriz, A., Molloy, C., Kriz, A., & Sonntag, S. (2016). All Australian regions are not born equal: Understanding the regional innovation management sandpit. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(6), 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar P. A. (2017). Customer experience trends in digital transformations. CapGemini.
  26. Lee, J.-H., Hancock, M. G., & Hu, M.-C. (2014). Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The triple-Helix model of smart cities: A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmot, P., & Dewhurst, M. (2017). A future that works: Employment, automation and productivity. San Francisco: McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
  29. Marshall, A. (1898). Principles of economics (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Newman, D. (2017). Top 10 trends for digital transformation in 2018. Forbes CMO Network.
  31. NSW Government. (2012). NSW digital economy – Industry action plan.
  32. OECD. (2013). Innovation-driven growth in regions: The role of smart specialisation. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oh, D. S., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Phillips, F. (2006). Social culture and high tech economic development: The Technopolis columns. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Richardson, H. W. (1995). Economies and diseconomies of agglomeration. In H. Giersch (Ed.), Urban agglomeration and economic growth. Kiel: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Roger, M., Florida, R., Pogue, M., & Mellander, C. (2015). Creativity, clusters and the competitive advantage of cities. Competitiveness Review, 25(5), 482–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schlaepger, R., Koch, M., & Merkofer, P. (2014) Industry 4.0 – Challenges and solutions for the digital transformation and use of exponential technologies. Deloitte Report, Switzerland.
  38. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Stam, S. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Startup Genome. (2017). Global startup ecosystem report.
  41. Tannery, A. N. (2016). The emergence of new technology-based industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 16, 611–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. The Committee for Sydney. (2017). #Wethecity3 – Towards a data-driven and responsive Sydney (Issues Paper 19).Google Scholar
  43. Thomas, J, Barraket, J, Wilson, C, Ewing, S, MacDonald, T, Tucker, J & Rennie, E, (2017). Measuring Australia’s digital divide: The Australian digital inclusion index 2017. RMIT University, Melbourne, for Telstra.
  44. Thurik, R., Stam, E., & Audretsch, D. (2013). The rise of the entrepreneurial economy and the future of dynamic capitalism. Technovation, 33(8–9), 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. UN. (2017). World cities report 2016. New York: UN.Google Scholar
  46. World Economic Forum. (2013). Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics. Davos: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information, Systems and ModellingUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations