Advertisement

The Qualitative Image: Urban Analytics, Hybridity and Digital Representation

  • Linda MatthewsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the S.M.A.R.T. Environments book series (SMARTE)

Abstract

High-precision analytical software, such as that used for medical imaging, can be also applied productively to the assessment of urban conditions such as pedestrian and vehicular flow. A prominent feature of this tool is its ability to offer a new and more abstract understanding of the material nature of the city. Drawing upon a range of scaled-up software procedures to illustrate capability, the chapter reveals how an analytical medical software tool can be adapted for use in alternative interdisciplinary contexts such as urban design. Using imagery captured from public domain webcams, it demonstrates how the upscaling and transferal of this digital tool from its original disciplinary role provides a new way of assessing the appropriateness of a proposed built intervention. It also reveals that the extension of this tool’s fine-grain, image-based analysis capabilities into a broader, more complex urban scale allows the more ambiguous and often-disregarded properties of city life to form part of a comprehensive and wholistic data set. The chapter concludes with the proposal that the synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data facilitated by this analytical platform exceeds the capability of urban assessment tools currently used by the discipline.

Keywords

Medical imaging Protocol Pixel Cross-disciplinary Qualitative Patterns Digital Colour Luminosity 

References

  1. 21st Century Digital Art. http://www.digiart21.org/art/isee
  2. Andrienko, N., & Andrienko, G. (2013). Visual analytics of movement: An overview of methods, tools and procedures. Information Visualization, 12(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Bremm, S., Schreck, T., Von Landesberger, T., Bak, P., & Keim, D. (2010). Space-in-time and time-in-space self-organizing maps for exploring spatiotemporal patterns. Computer Graphics Forum, 29(3), 913–922. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, S. (2005). Freeware vs Shareware vs Open Source [Online]. Available: http://opensourcestrategies.blogspot.com.au/2005/09/freeware-vs-shareware-vs-open-source.html. Accessed 02/03 2013.
  5. Ferreira, T., & Rasband, W. (2011). The ImageJ user guide. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  6. Ferreira, N., Poco, J., Vo, H. T., Freire, J., & Silva, C. T. (2013). Visual exploration of big spatio-temporal urban data: A study of New York city taxi trips. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2149–2158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foley, J. D., Van Dam, A., Feiner, S. K., & Hughes, J. F. (2014). Computer graphics: Principles and practice. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  8. GNU Image Manipulation Program. http://www.gimp.org
  9. Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 1–25). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. ImageJ: Image Processing and Analysis in Java. http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/.
  11. Klette, R., & Rosenfeld, A. (2004). Digital geometry: Geometric methods for digital picture analysis. Amsterdam/Boston: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Kruegle, H. (2011). CCTV surveillance: Video practices and technology. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  13. Kurgan, L. (2013). Close up at a distance: Mapping, technology, and politics. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Macarthur, J. (2000). From the air: Collage City, aerial photography and the picturesque. In M. Ostwald & J. S. Moore (Eds.), Re-framing architecture: Theory, science and myth. Sydney: Archadia Press.Google Scholar
  15. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Poynton, C. (2012). Digital video and HD: Algorithms and interfaces. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  17. Scheepens, R., Willems, N., Van de Wetering, H., Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., & Van Wijk, J. J. (2011). Composite density maps for multivariate trajectories. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2518–2527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Scheepens, R., Hurter, C., Van De Wetering, H., & Van Wijk, J. J. (2016). Visualization, selection, and analysis of traffic flows. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1), 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., et al. (2012). Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods, 9(7), 676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wongsuphasawat, K., & Gotz, D. (2012). Exploring flow, factors, and outcomes of temporal event sequences with the outflow visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12), 2659–2668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeng, W., Fu, C.-W., Arisona, S. M., Erath, A., & Qu, H. (2016). Visualizing waypoints-constrained origin-destination patterns for massive transportation data. Computer Graphics Forum, 35(8), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture, Faculty of Design Architecture and BuildingUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations